Cited by 35Traffic control and managementTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesReinforcement Learning in Robotics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control Model and Adaptation Study

Open access
Tan, Jiyuan, Yuan, Qian, Guo, Weiwei, Xie, Na, Liu, Fuyu, Wei, Jing, Zhang, Xinwei·2022·Sensors

Abstract

Deep reinforcement learning provides a new approach to solving complex signal optimization problems at intersections. Earlier studies were limited to traditional traffic detection techniques, and the obtained traffic information was not accurate. With the advanced in technology, we can obtain highly accurate information on the traffic states by advanced detector technology. This provides an accurate source of data for deep reinforcement learning. There are many intersections in the urban network. To successfully apply deep reinforcement learning in a situation closer to reality, we need to consider the problem of extending the knowledge gained from the training to new scenarios. This study used advanced sensor technology as a data source to explore the variation pattern of state space under different traffic scenarios. It analyzes the relationship between the traffic demand and the actual traffic states. The model learned more from a more comprehensive state space of traffic. This model was successful applied to new traffic scenarios without additional training. Compared our proposed model with the popular SAC signal control model, the result shows that the average delay of the DQN model is 5.13 s and the SAC model is 6.52 s. Therefore, our model exhibits better control performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22228732

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing reinforcement-learning traffic signal control models require centralized control, which can become ineffective and susceptible to communication latency in extensive city networks.

    “Most of these models, though, require centralized control, and it can become ineffective and susceptible to communication latency in the case of extensive city networks [8,9].”

    From Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Real-time Traffic Control in 6G-Enabled VANET Environments (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction says that cities have many intersections and that training a separate model for each takes significant time. It does not say that most reinforcement-learning traffic signal models require centralized control or that communication latency makes such control ineffective in extensive networks. Searches for centralized control, distributed control, and communication latency found no passage addressing those points. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Liu, 2015, Development and Tendency of Intelligent Transportation Systems in China, Autom. Panor., 1, 58
  2. Gao, 2006, Single intersection signal control based on multi-sensor information fusion, China Sci. Technol. Inf., 24, 84
  3. Si, W. (2020). Intelligent Traffic Signal Control System Design and Development Practice Based on ITS System Framework. [Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang University].
  4. Zhou, J. (2020). Induced Signal Control Evaluation and Parameter Optimization Based on Video-Detected Traffic Flow Data. [Master’s Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology].
  5. Xu, Y. (2021). Study on the Application of Simulation and Evaluation Methods for Urban Traffic Signal Control. [Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University of Technology].
  6. Lillicrap, T.P., Hunt, J.J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., and Wierstra, D. (2015). Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv.
  7. Casas, N. (2017). Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient for Urban Traffic Light Control. arXiv.
  8. Lin, Y., Dai, X., Li, L., and Wang, F.Y. (2018). An efficient deep reinforcement learning model for urban traffic control. arXiv.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tan, J., Yuan, Q., Guo, W., Xie, N., Liu, F., Wei, J., & Zhang, X.
Affiliations
  • North China University of Technology (CN)
  • Central University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
Xie, Na
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-11
Volume
22
Issue
22
Pages
8732
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308971790
Cited by
32
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1601100, CIT&TCD201904013, CIT&TCD201804006, KM202010009007)
  • the Youth Top Talent Training Program of Beijing (2018YFB1601100, CIT&TCD201904013, CIT&TCD201804006, KM202010009007)
  • the General Program of Science and Technology Plan of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (2018YFB1601100, CIT&TCD201904013, CIT&TCD201804006, KM202010009007)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
traffic signal control, deep reinforcement learning, deep Q-network, soft actor-critic, traffic state estimation, state-space model, vehicle delay
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review