Technology to Automatically Record Eating Behavior in Real Life: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
To monitor adherence to diets and to design and evaluate nutritional interventions, it is essential to obtain objective knowledge about eating behavior. In most research, measures of eating behavior are based on self-reporting, such as 24-h recalls, food records (food diaries) and food frequency questionnaires. Self-reporting is prone to inaccuracies due to inaccurate and subjective recall and other biases. Recording behavior using nonobtrusive technology in daily life would overcome this. Here, we provide an up-to-date systematic overview encompassing all (close-to) publicly or commercially available technologies to automatically record eating behavior in real-life settings. A total of 1328 studies were screened and, after applying defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 122 studies were included for in-depth evaluation. Technologies in these studies were categorized by what type of eating behavior they measure and which type of sensor technology they use. In general, we found that relatively simple sensors are often used. Depending on the purpose, these are mainly motion sensors, microphones, weight sensors and photo cameras. While several of these technologies are commercially available, there is still a lack of publicly available algorithms that are needed to process and interpret the resulting data. We argue that future work should focus on developing robust algorithms and validating these technologies in real-life settings. Combining technologies (e.g., prompting individuals for self-reports at sensed, opportune moments) is a promising route toward ecologically valid studies of eating behavior.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n160 · Cited by 11,883 · see citing works
Wohlin, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2601248.2601268 · Cited by 4,234 · see citing works
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137 · see citing works
The Use of Mobile Devices in Aiding Dietary Assessment and Evaluation
Zhu, F., Bosch, M., Woo, I., Kim, S., Boushey, C. J., Ebert, D. S., & Delp, E. J. (2010) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2010.2051471 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
A comparison between audio and IMU data to detect chewing events based on an earable device
Lotfi, R., Tzanetakis, G., Eskicioglu, R., & Irani, P. (2020) · Proceedings of the 11th Augmented Human International Conference · doi:10.1145/3396339.3396362 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ray, S. J., Cherian, J., Liberty, A. M., Hammond, T. A., & Shireman, P. K. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.67373 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hiraguchi, H., Perone, P., Toet, A., Camps, G., & Brouwer, A.-M.
- Affiliations
- Kikkoman (Japan) (JP)
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- OnePlanet Research Center (NL)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hiraguchi, Haruka
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-09-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7757
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10534458
- OpenAlex
- W4386542625
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Kikkoman Europe R&D Laboratory B.V.
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- dietary habits, dietary adherence, dietary intervention, self-report bias, motion sensors, weight sensor, data processing algorithms, food intake measurement
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Diet Records, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review