Cited by 24Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsSpeech and Audio ProcessingNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

A comparison between audio and IMU data to detect chewing events based on an earable device

Lotfi, Roya, Tzanetakis, George, Eskicioglu, Rasit, Irani, Pourang·2020·Proceedings of the 11th Augmented Human International Conference

Abstract

The feasibility of collecting various data from built-in wearable sensors has enticed many researchers to use these devices for analyzing human activities and behaviors. In particular, audio, video, and motion data have been utilized for automatic dietary monitoring. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of detecting chewing activities based on audio and inertial sensor data obtained from an ear-worn device, eSense. We process each sensor data separately and determine the accuracy of each sensing modality for chewing detection when using MFCC and Spectral Centroid as features and Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, and Random Forest as classifiers. We also measure the performance of chewing detection when fusing features extracted from both audio and inertial sensor data. We evaluate the chewing detection algorithm by running a pilot study inside a lab environment on a total of 5 participants. This consists of 130 minutes audio and inertial measurement unit (IMU) data. The results of this study indicate that an in-ear IMU with an accuracy of 95% outperforms audio data in detecting chewing and fusing both modalities improves the accuracy to 97%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3396339.3396362

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lotfi, R., Tzanetakis, G., Eskicioglu, R., & Irani, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th Augmented Human International Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2020-05-27
Pages
1-8
OpenAlex
W3030248081
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Augmented Human International Conference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
chewing detection, inertial measurement unit, audio data, multimodal sensor fusion, dietary monitoring, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, spectral centroid, activity recognition, wearable sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review