Cited by 15Emotion and Mood RecognitionDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research Topics

Towards Personalised Mood Prediction and Explanation for Depression from Biophysical Data

Open access
Chatterjee, Sobhan, Mishra, Jyoti, Sundram, Frederick, Roop, Partha·2023·Sensors

Abstract

Digital health applications using Artificial Intelligence (AI) are a promising opportunity to address the widening gap between available resources and mental health needs globally. Increasingly, passively acquired data from wearables are augmented with carefully selected active data from depressed individuals to develop Machine Learning (ML) models of depression based on mood scores. However, most ML models are black box in nature, and hence the outputs are not explainable. Depression is also multimodal, and the reasons for depression may vary significantly between individuals. Explainable and personalised models will thus be beneficial to clinicians to determine the main features that lead to a decline in the mood state of a depressed individual, thus enabling suitable personalised therapy. This is currently lacking. Therefore, this study presents a methodology for developing personalised and accurate Deep Learning (DL)-based predictive mood models for depression, along with novel methods for identifying the key facets that lead to the exacerbation of depressive symptoms. We illustrate our approach by using an existing multimodal dataset containing longitudinal Ecological Momentary Assessments of depression, lifestyle data from wearables and neurocognitive assessments for 14 mild to moderately depressed participants over one month. We develop classification- and regression-based DL models to predict participants’ current mood scores—a discrete score given to a participant based on the severity of their depressive symptoms. The models are trained inside eight different evolutionary-algorithm-based optimisation schemes that optimise the model parameters for a maximum predictive performance. A five-fold cross-validation scheme is used to verify the DL model’s predictive performance against 10 classical ML-based models, with a model error as low as 6% for some participants. We use the best model from the optimisation process to extract indicators, using SHAP, ALE and Anchors from explainable AI literature to explain why certain predictions are made and how they affect mood. These feature insights can assist health professionals in incorporating personalised interventions into a depressed individual’s treatment regimen.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s24010164

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 15

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK) The classification of depression and depression rating scales/questionnaires Depression in Adults with a Chronic Physical Health Problem: Treatment and Management British Psychological Society London, UK 2010 22259826
  2. [40]Goodfellow I. Bengio Y. Courville A. Deep Learning The MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2016
  3. [59]Murphy K.P. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective The MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2012
  4. [60]Kingma D.P. Ba J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations San Diego, CA, USA 7–9 May 2015
  5. [66]Abadi M. Barham P. Chen J. Chen Z. Davis A. Dean J. Devin M. Ghemawat S. Irving G. Isard M. TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16) Savannah, GA, USA 2–4 November 2016 265 283

Authors
Chatterjee, S., Mishra, J., Sundram, F., & Roop, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chatterjee, Sobhan
  • Roop, Partha
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-12-27
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
164
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390266890
Cited by
15
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression, mood prediction, explainable AI, wearable sensors, ecological momentary assessment, neuropsychological assessment, lifestyle data, SHAP, ale, anchors, digital mental health
MeSH terms
Affect, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Depression, Biological Evolution, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review