Cited by 10Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Human Activity Recognition in a Free-Living Environment Using an Ear-Worn Motion Sensor

Open access
Boborzi, Lukas, Decker, Julian, Rezaei, Razieh, Schniepp, Roman, Wuehr, Max·2024·Sensors

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) technology enables continuous behavior monitoring, which is particularly valuable in healthcare. This study investigates the viability of using an ear-worn motion sensor for classifying daily activities, including lying, sitting/standing, walking, ascending stairs, descending stairs, and running. Fifty healthy participants (between 20 and 47 years old) engaged in these activities while under monitoring. Various machine learning algorithms, ranging from interpretable shallow models to state-of-the-art deep learning approaches designed for HAR (i.e., DeepConvLSTM and ConvTransformer), were employed for classification. The results demonstrate the ear sensor’s efficacy, with deep learning models achieving a 98% accuracy rate of classification. The obtained classification models are agnostic regarding which ear the sensor is worn and robust against moderate variations in sensor orientation (e.g., due to differences in auricle anatomy), meaning no initial calibration of the sensor orientation is required. The study underscores the ear’s efficacy as a suitable site for monitoring human daily activity and suggests its potential for combining HAR with in-ear vital sign monitoring. This approach offers a practical method for comprehensive health monitoring by integrating sensors in a single anatomical location. This integration facilitates individualized health assessments, with potential applications in tele-monitoring, personalized health insights, and optimizing athletic training regimes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s24092665

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boborzi, L., Decker, J., Rezaei, R., Schniepp, R., & Wuehr, M.
Affiliations
  • Deutsches Schwindel- und Gleichgewichtszentrum (DE)
  • Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (DE)
Corresponding author
Wuehr, Max
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-04-23
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
2665
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395048752
Cited by
9
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Federal Ministry for Education and Science (01EO1401, 13GW0490B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
human activity recognition, wearable sensors, stair climbing, running, remote patient monitoring, health monitoring
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Wearable Electronic Devices, Deep Learning, Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Algorithms, Ear, Female, Humans, Human Activities, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motion, Walking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review