Cited by 9Gender, Feminism, and MediaMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingGender and Feminist Studies

Informal Learning with a Gender Perspective Transmitted by Influencers through Content on YouTube and Instagram in Spain

Open access
Arias-Rodriguez, Alicia, Sánchez-Bello, Ana·2022·Social Sciences

Abstract

The struggle for gender equality is based on identifying, understanding, and eradicating the causes of inequality. Digital media are and have always been governed by men and, as a consequence, have become another instrument of patriarchy. This article analyses the content created on YouTube and Instagram by four of the most popular influencers in Spain in order to examine the presence of stereotypes and gender roles, the use of sexist or inclusive language, and the influencers’ level of social engagement on issues related to gender equality. A content analysis approach using ATLAS.ti 8 software was chosen, as this method provides information about the sender of the message as the well the message itself and its impact. The findings of the analysis show that influencers transmit sexist roles and stereotypes, use non-inclusive language, and exhibit no social engagement on questions of gender inequality. The study concludes by highlighting the importance of cyberfeminism as a way of promoting gender equality online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/socsci11080341

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ackerman, Lauren M. 2019. Syntactic and cognitive issues in investigating gendered coreference. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4: 5-27. Available online: https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5224 (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  2. Casado, Carla, and Xavier Carbonell. 2018. La influencia de la personalidad en el uso de Instagram. Aloma: Revista de Psicologia, Ciències de L'educació i de L'esport 36: 23-31. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/La-influencia-de-la-personalidad- en-el-uso-de-Riera-Carbonell/525ef8701e97eee1225b566c579ca9675a709255 (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  3. Castells, Manuel. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Curbelo, Dayana, and Natalia Moreira. 2016. Adolescentes y tecnologías en el aula. Un análisis desde la perspectiva de género. Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación 487: 1-22. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/1079 3801/Adolescentes_y_tecnolog%C3%ADas_en_el_aula_An%C3%A1lisis_desde_la_perspectiva_de_g%C3%A9nero (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  5. Demirhan, Kamil, and Derya Çakır-Demirhan. 2015. Gender and politics: Patriarchal discourse on social media. Public Relations Review 41: 308-10.
  6. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria M. 2018. Reflexiones sobre el género como categoría gramatical. Cambio ecológico y tipología lingüística. In De la Lingüística a la Semiótica: Trayectorias y Horizontes del Estudio de la Comunicación. Edited by Maria Ninova. Sofia: Bulgaria Univer- sidad San Clemente de Ojrid, pp. 1-28. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326583738_REFLEXIONES_ SOBRE_EL_GENERO_COMO_CATEGORIA_GRAMATICAL_CAMBIO_ECOLOGICO_Y_TIPOLOGIA_LINGUISTICA (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  7. Hwang, Sungsoo. 2007. Utilizing qualitative data analysis software: A review of ATLAS.ti. Social Science Computer Review 26: 519-27.
  8. CrossRef · DOI
  9. Miles, Mateo, Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. New York: SAGE Publications.
  10. Schugurensky, Daniel. 2000. The Forms of Informal Learning. Towards a Conceptualization of the Field; London Centre for the study of Education and Labor, OISE/UT. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/1807/2733 (accessed on 19 April 2022).
  11. Valcárcel, Amelia. 2000. La memoria colectiva y los retos del feminismo. In Los Desafíos del Feminismo Ante el Siglo XXI. Edited by Rocio Romero and Amelia Valcárcel. Madrid: Hypatia, pp. 19-54. Available online: https://bit.ly/3FU9kP9 (accessed on 19 April 2022).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arias-Rodriguez, A., & Sánchez-Bello, A.
Affiliations
Faculty of Education Sciences, Campus de Elviña, University of Coruña, 15071 Coruña, Spain
Venue
Social Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-02
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
341
ISSN
2076-0760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289524801
Cited by
9
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RUC (Universidade Da Coruña) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
gender equality, gender stereotypes, gender roles, influencers, YouTube, Instagram, sexism, inclusive language, patriarchy, cyberfeminism, social engagement, informal learning, Spain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review