Millennial Perceptions of Fast Fashion and Second-Hand Clothing: An Exploration of Clothing Preferences Using Q Methodology
Open accessAbstract
Millennials are becoming more conscientious of the products they buy, as well as the social and environmental implications behind them. However, Millennials with low discretionary incomes have limited choices in today’s marketplace, and it is unclear as to how these consumers perceive low-cost apparel options, including fast fashion apparel and second-hand apparel. The purpose of this study is to explore and compare Millennials’ perceptions of inexpensive fast fashion and second-hand apparel. The Q methodology was employed to determine patterns among perceptions. Participants sorted 14 statements describing ideal clothing items into a Q sort grid. The Q sort grid forced participants to rank statements by the degree to which they agree (or disagree). Once the Q sort grid was completed, participants shared their thoughts (qualitatively) as to why they ranked each statement the way that they did. The findings indicate that there are varied perceptions across the Millennial generation, which resulted in the emergence of four distinct factors for both fast fashion and second-hand apparel. The findings of this study are extensive. Fast fashion retailers and consignment shops will need to update their future strategies in order to target the Millennial generation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Allen, Myria W., and Matthew L. Spialek. 2018. Young millennials, environmental orientation, food company sustainability, and green word-of-mouth recommendations. Journal of Food Products Marketing 24: 1-27.
- CrossRef · DOI
- CrossRef · DOI
- Elrod, Cassandra. 2017. The domino effect: How inadequate intellectual property rights in the fashion industry affect global sustainability. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 24: 575-96.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Gopalakrishnan, Sivasankari, and Delisia Matthews. 2017. Collaborative consumption: A business model analysis of second-hand fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 22: 354-68.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Gwozdz, Wencke, Kristian Steensen Nielsen, and Tina Muller. 2017. An environmental perspective on clothing consumptions: Consumer segments and their behavioral patterns. Sustainability 9: 762. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Han, Jinghe, Yuri Seo, and Eunju Ko. 2017. Staging luxury experiences for understanding sustainable fashion consumption: A balance theory application. Journal of Business Research 74: 162-67.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Henninger, Claudia E., Panayiota J. Alevizou, and Caroline J. Oates. 2016. What is sustainable fashion? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 20: 400-16.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Hwang, Jiyoung, and Merlyn A. Griffiths. 2017. Share more, drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing 34: 132-46.
- CrossRef · DOI · Paper page
- Kan, Irene P., and Anna B. Drummey. 2018. Do imposters threaten data quality? An examination of worker misrepresentation and downstream consequences in Amazon's Mechanical Turk workforce. Computers in Human Behavior 83: 243-53. [CrossRef · DOI
- Kong, Hyun Min, and Eunju Ko. 2017. Why do consumers choose sustainable fashion? A cross-cultural study of South Korean, Chinese, and Japanese consumers. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing 8: 220-34.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Lee, Kaman. 2014. Predictors of sustainable consumption among young educated consumers in Hong Kong. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 26: 217-38.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Lee, Michael S. W., Miriam Seifert, and Helene Cherrier. 2017. Anti-consumption and governance is the global fashion industry: Transparency is key. In Governing Corporate Social Responsibility in the Apparel Industry after Rana Plaza, 1st ed. Edited by Anil Hira and Maureen Benson-Rea. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 147-74.
- Pierce, James, and Eric Paulos. 2011. Second-hand interactions: Investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects. Paper presented at SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 7-12; pp. 2385-94.
- Ramlo, Susan, and Isadore Newman. 2011. Classifying individuals using Q methodology and Q factor analysis: Applications of two mixed methodologies for program evaluation. Journal of Research in Education 21: 20-31.
- Stephenson, William. 1953. The Study of Behavior: Q Technique and Its Methodology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- CrossRef · DOI
- Watts, Simon, and Paul Stenner. 2005. The subjective experience of partnership love: A Q methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology 44: 85-107. [CrossRef] PubMed · DOI
- Yang, Shuai, Yiping Song, and Siliang Tong. 2017. Sustainable retailing in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 9: 1266. [CrossRef] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trisno, R., Lianto, F., & Choandi, M. (2020) · International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology · doi:10.37624/ijert/13.11.2020.3262-3265 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Clothing and accessories are designed in a naturally inspired form while providing a variety of possible patterns and structures [5, 4].”
Background
- Authors
- Sorensen, K., & Johnson Jorgensen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
- College of Education and Human Sciences, Department of Textiles, Merchandising & Fashion Design, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0802, USA
- ORCID
- Sorensen, Katelyn
- Venue
- Social Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-08-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 244
- ISSN
- 2076-0760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2969426265
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Q Methodology Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
- Keywords
- fast fashion, second-hand clothing, millennials, clothing preferences, consumer perception, retail strategy, sustainable consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review