The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spatial Association and Effect Evaluation of CO2 Emission in the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: Quantitative Evidence from Social Network Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Urban agglomeration, an established urban spatial pattern, contributes to the spatial association and dependence of city-level CO2 emission distribution while boosting regional economic growth. Exploring this spatial association and dependence is conducive to the implementation of effective and coordinated policies for regional level CO2 reduction. This study calculated CO2 emissions from 2005–2016 in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration with the IPAT model, and empirically explored the spatial structure pattern and association effect of CO2 across the area leveraged by the social network analysis. The findings revealed the following: (1) The spatial structure of CO2 emission in the area is a complex network pattern, and in the sample period, the CO2 emission association relations increased steadily and the network stabilization remains strengthened; (2) the centrality of the cities in this area can be categorized into three classes: Chengdu and Chongqing are defined as the first class, the second class covers Deyang, Mianyang, Yibin, and Nanchong, and the third class includes Zigong, Suining, Meishan, and Guangan—the number of cities in this class is on the rise; (3) the network is divided into four subgroups: the area around Chengdu, south Sichuan, northeast Sichuan, and west Chongqing where the spillover effect of CO2 is greatest; and (4) the higher density of the global network of CO2 emission considerably reduces regional emission intensity and narrows the differences among regions. Individual networks with higher centrality are also found to have lower emission intensity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumption-based emission accounting for Chinese cities
Mi, Z., Zhang, Y., Guan, D., Shan, Y., Liu, Z., Cong, R., Yuan, X.-C., & Wei, Y.-M. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.094 · Cited by 636
Wang, P., Wu, W., Zhu, B., & Wei, Y. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.036 · Cited by 547
Wang, Z., Yin, F., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.038 · Cited by 415
Liu, H., Fang, C., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Bao, C., & Li, F. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.127 · Cited by 320
The effects of urban agglomeration economies on carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese cities
Han, F., Xie, R., lu, Y., Fang, J., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.273 · Cited by 313
Liu, Z., Liu, Y., He, B.-J., Xu, W., Jin, G., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.023 · Cited by 305
Li, Z., Shao, S., Shi, X., Sun, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.241 · Cited by 272
Zhou, Y., Shan, Y., Liu, G., & Guan, D. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.038 · Cited by 180
A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China
Li, L., Hong, X., & Peng, K. (2018) · Structural Change and Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2018.09.010 · Cited by 152
Wang, B., Sun, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.243 · Cited by 145
Cited by
Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research
Wu, Y., Ngai, E. W. T., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113280 · Cited by 359
Shahzad, U. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08349-4 · Cited by 348
The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis
Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ismail, N., Ahrari, S., & Abu Samah, A. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.053 · Cited by 312
Are green bonds a different asset class? Evidence from time-frequency connectedness analysis
Ferrer, R., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Soriano, P. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125988 · Cited by 253
Barış-Tüzemen, Ö., Tüzemen, S., & Çelik, A. K. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08513-w · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, J., Feng, Q., Wang, X., Fu, H., Jiang, W., & Chen, B.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-12-20
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904599941
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 63.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial Association and Effect Evaluation of CO2 Emission in the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: Quantitative Evidence from Social Network Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su11010001
- The paper
- Song, J., Feng, Q., Wang, X., Fu, H., Jiang, W., & Chen, B. (2018). Spatial Association and Effect Evaluation of CO2 Emission in the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: Quantitative Evidence from Social Network Analysis. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.