The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Introduction of Insect Meal into Fish Diet: The First Economic Analysis on European Sea Bass Farming
Open accessAbstract
The economic and environmental sustainability of aquaculture depends significantly on the nature and quality of the fish feed used. One of the main criticisms of aquaculture is the need to use significant amounts of fish meal, and other marine protein sources, in such feed. Unfortunately, the availability of the oceanic resources, typically used to produce fish feed, cannot be utilized indefinitely to cover the worldwide feed demand caused by ever-increasing aquaculture production. In light of these considerations, this study estimates how aquaculture farm economic outcomes can change by introducing insect meal into the diet of cultivated fish. Several possible economic effects are simulated, based on various scenarios, with different percentages of insect flour in the feed and varying meal prices using a case study of a specialized off-shore sea bass farm in Italy. The findings indicate that the introduction of insect meal—composed of Tenebrio molitor—would increase feeding costs due to the high market prices of this flour and its less convenient feed conversion ratio than that of fish meal. Therefore, the expected environmental benefits of using this highly promising insect meal in fish feed do not align with the current economic interests of the aquaculture industry. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this theme, and it must be noted that our findings cannot be generalized widely because a specific case study was used. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that efforts should be made—at least at the farm level—to find profitable ways to encourage the introduction of this attractive alternative to guarantee both economic and environmental sustainability in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In comparison, microalgae-based feed costs lesser than the fish meal (1.5$/kg) and insect-based feed (3-5.9$/kg)but higher than the plant-based feed (0.64$/kg) (Arru et al., 2019;Indexmundi, 2021;Sarker et al., 2020a).”
From Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture (2021) · cites this paper as Arru et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security.
van Huis, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704 · Cited by 1,891
State of the art on use of insects as animal feed.
Makkar, H. P. S., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008 · Cited by 1,846
Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2013) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2013.6601104 · Cited by 1,801
The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review
van Huis, A., & Oonincx, D. G. A. B. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8 · Cited by 1,159
Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: Past and future
Henry, M. A., Gasco, L., Piccolo, G., & Fountoulaki, E. (2015) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.03.001 · Cited by 891
Self-citationPotential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production
Rumpold, B. A., & Schlüter, O. (2012) · Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2012.11.005 · Cited by 798
Lo que se necesita para el futuro: una cultura de la sinceridad
O’Toole, J., & Bennis, W. G. (2009) · Harvard business review · Cited by 596
Meneguz, M., Schiavone, A., Gai, F., Dama, A., Lussiana, C., Renna, M., & Gasco, L. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9127 · Cited by 532
Self-citationMarco, M. D., Martínez-Miró, S., Hernández, F., Madrid, J., Gai, F., Rotolo, L., Belforti, M., Bergero, D., Katz, H., Dabbou, S., et al. (2015) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.08.006 · Cited by 461
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Yin, R.K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, SAGE Publications.
- Glasser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Adline De Gruyter.
- Wilson, R.P. (2002). Protein and aminoacids. Fish Nutrition, Academic Press.
- Dussault, 2017, Les insectes au service de l’humain pour la gestion des résidus organiques, Vecteur Environ., 50, 46
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets
Hua, K., Cobcroft, J. M., Cole, A. J., Condon, K., Jerry, D. R., Mangott, A., Praeger, C., Vucko, M. J., Zeng, C., Zenger, K. R., et al. (2019) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018 · Cited by 947
Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture
Nagappan, S., Das, P., AbdulQuadir, M., Thaher, M., Khan, S., Mahata, C., Al-Jabri, H., Vatland, A. K., & Kumar, G. (2021) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.09.003 · Cited by 364
Gasco, L., Acuti, G., Bani, P., Zotte, A. D., Danieli, P. P., Angelis, A. D., Fortina, R., Marino, R., Parisi, G., Piccolo, G., et al. (2020) · Italian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1080/1828051x.2020.1743209 · Cited by 297
Self-citationInsect Farming for Feed and Food Production from a Circular Business Model Perspective
Madau, F. A., Arru, B., Furesi, R., & Pulina, P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12135418 · Cited by 232
Self-citationTippayadara, N., Dawood, M. A. O., Krutmuang, P., Hoseinifar, S. H., Doan, H. V., & Paolucci, M. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11010193 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Arru, B., Furesi, R., Gasco, L., Madau, F., & Pulina, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Sassari (IT)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Arru, Brunella
- Madau, Fabio
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-03-21
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1697
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2923330433
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UnissResearch (Università degli Studi di Sassari) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Fisheries and Aquaculture Studies
- Keywords
- insect meal, fish feed, Dicentrarchus labrax, aquaculture economics, Tenebrio molitor, fish meal replacement, feed conversion ratio, feed cost, alternative protein sources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
