The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opportunities for the Adoption of Health-Based Sustainable Dietary Patterns: A Review on Consumer Research of Meat Substitutes
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews empirical research on consumers’ adoption of meat substitutes published up to spring 2018. Recent meat substitutes often have sustainable characteristics in line with consumers’ concerns over aspects of healthy food and the environmental impact of food production. However, changing lifestyles with less time for cooking, any transition from a strongly meat-based to a more plant-based diet depends on the successful establishment of convenient meat substitutes. This article reviews the growing body of research on meat substitutes. These research articles were classified into five different stages in line with the innovation-decision process of: knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation and confirmation. The research was analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively, with results suggesting that although health, environmental and animal welfare aspects can persuade consumers and influence their decision to try a meat substitute, the appearance and taste of those meat substitutes are crucial factors for their consumption on a regular basis. However, there still remains a gap in research articles focusing on the regular consumption of meat substitutes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance
Tan, H. S. G., Fischer, A. R. H., Tinchan, P., Stieger, M., Steenbekkers, L. P. A., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.01.013 · Cited by 500
GIBSON, R. B. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management · doi:10.1142/s1464333206002517 · Cited by 486
A Prospective Study of Red Meat Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes in Middle-Aged and Elderly Women
Song, Y., Manson, J. E., Buring, J. E., & Liu, S. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.9.2108 · Cited by 368
Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context
Elzerman, J. E., Hoek, A. C., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Luning, P. A. (2011) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.006 · Cited by 326
Cited by
Onwezen, M. C., Bouwman, E. P., Reinders, M. J., & Dagevos, H. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105058 · Cited by 1,048
Bryant, C. J. (2022) · Future Foods · doi:10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100174 · Cited by 303
Perceptions of Vegan Food among Organic Food Consumers Following Different Diets
Kilian, D., & Hamm, U. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179794 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Weinrich, R.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-07-25
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 4028
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963165964
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opportunities for the Adoption of Health-Based Sustainable Dietary Patterns: A Review on Consumer Research of Meat Substitutes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su11154028
- The paper
- Weinrich, R. (2019). Opportunities for the Adoption of Health-Based Sustainable Dietary Patterns: A Review on Consumer Research of Meat Substitutes. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.