Cited by 63Phosphorus and nutrient managementWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Holistic Approach to Phosphorus Recovery from Urban Wastewater: Enhanced Biological Removal Combined with Precipitation

Open access
Tomei, Maria Concetta, Stazi, Valentina, Daneshgar, Saba, Capodaglio, Andrea G.·2020·Sustainability

Abstract

Combined phosphorus (P) removal and recovery from wastewater is a sensible and sustainable choice in view of potential future P-resource scarcity, due to dwindling primary global reserves. P-recovery from wastewater, notwithstanding the relatively small fraction of total global amounts involved (less than 1/5 of total global use ends up in wastewater) could extend the lifespan of available reserves and improve wastewater cycle sustainability. The recovery of the resource, rather than its mere removal as ferric or aluminum salt, will still allow to achieve protection of receiving waters quality, while saving on P-sludge disposal costs. To demonstrate the possibility of such a recovery, a strategy combining enhanced biological phosphorus removal and mineral P-precipitation was studied, by considering possible process modifications of a large treatment facility. Process simulation, a pilot study, and precipitation tests were conducted. The results demonstrated that it would be possible to convert this facility from chemical -precipitation to its biological removal followed by mineral precipitation, with minimal structural intervention. Considerable P-recovery could be obtained, either in form of struvite or, more sustainably, as calcium phosphate, a mineral that also has possible fertilizing applications. The latter would present a cost about one order of magnitude lower than the former.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12020575

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3]3. Smil, V. Phosphorus: Global Transfers, Causes and consequences of global environmental change. In Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change ; Douglas, I., Munn, T., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2002; Volume 3, pp. 536-542.
  2. [4]4. Council Directive 91 / 271 / EEC, Official Journal of the European Communities. 1991. 135 / 40. Available online: https: // eurlex.europa.eu / legalcontent / EN / TXT / PDF / ?uri = CELEX:31991L0271&from = EN(accessed on 20 April 2017).
  3. [6]6. Levin, G.V.; Sharpiro, J. Metabolic uptake of phosphorus by wastewater organics. J. Water Pollut. Control. Fed. 1965 , 37 , 800-821.
  4. [7]7. Barnard, J.L. A review of biological phosphorous removal in activated sludge process. Water SA 1976 , 2 , 136-144.
  5. [10]10. Water Environment Federation and American Society of Civil Engineers (WEF-ASCE) (Ed.) Design of Water Resource Recovery Facilities , 6th ed.; MOP8-MREP76; Mc Graw Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  6. [15]15. Tykesson, E.; Jansen, J.L.C. Evaluation of laboratory batch tests for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Vatten 2005 , 61 , 43-50.
  7. [20]20. Barnard, J.L. Activated primary tanks for phosphate removal. Water SA 1984 , 10 , 121-126.
  8. [23]23. Gellings, C.W.; Parmenter, K.E. Energy e ciency in fertilizer production and use. In Knowledge for Sustainable Development ; Gellings, C.W., Blok, K., Eds.; Eolss Publishers: Oxford, UK, 2004.

Authors
Tomei, M. C., Stazi, V., Daneshgar, S., & Capodaglio, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Water Research Institute (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Capodaglio, Andrea G.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-01-12
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
575
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999990127
Cited by
63
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fondazione Cariplo (2014/0528)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
phosphorus recovery, municipal wastewater, enhanced biological phosphorus removal, struvite, calcium phosphate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review