Neighbourhood Modelling for Urban Sustainability Assessment
Open accessAbstract
Climate change is becoming a dominant concern for advanced countries. The Paris Agreement sets out a global framework whose implementation relates to all human activities and is commonly guided by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), which set the scene for sustainable development performance configuring all climate action related policies. Fast control of CO2 emissions necessarily involves cities since they are responsible for 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. SDG 11 (Sustainable cities and communities) is clearly involved in the deployment of SDG 13 (Climate Action). European Sustainability policies are financially guided by the European Green Deal for a climate neutral urban environment. In turn, a common framework for urban policy impact assessment must be based on architectural design tools, such as building certification, and common data repositories for standard digital building models. Many Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment (NSA) tools have been developed but the growing availability of open data repositories for cities, together with big-data sources (provided through Internet of Things repositories), allow accurate neighbourhood simulations, or in other words, digital twins of neighbourhoods. These digital twins are excellent tools for policy impact assessment. After a careful analysis of current scientific literature, this paper provides a generic approach for a simple neighbourhood model developed from building physical parameters which meets relevant assessment requirements, while simultaneously being updated (and tested) against real open data repositories, and how this assessment is related to building certification tools. The proposal is validated by real data on energy consumption and on its application to the Benicalap neighbourhood in Valencia (Spain).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information flowing from various levels of indicator systems presents a challenge for developing common policies and standards.
“Furthermore, information flowing from various levels of indicator systems presents a challenge for developing common policies and standards [82].”
From Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Peng, Y.; Lai, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. An alternative model for measuring the sustainability of urban regeneration: The way forward. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 109, 76-83. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Salat, S. Cities and Forms, on Sustainable Urbanism; CSTB Urban Morphology Laboratory, Hermann Editeurs: Paris, France, 2011; Chapter 3; pp. 241-256.
- Mavi, R.K.; Gengatharen, D.; Mavi, N.K.; Hughes, R.; Campbell, A.; Yates, R. Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1932. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kim, R.; Lim, M.-K.; Roh, S.; Park, W.-J. Analysis of the Characteristics of Environmental Impacts According to the Cut-Off Criteria Applicable to the Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) of Apartment Buildings in South Korea. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2898. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sharifi, A.; Murayama, A. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 38, 73-87. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bragança, L.; Mateus, R.; Koukkari, H. Building Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability 2010, 2, 2010-2023. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bruce-Hyrkäs, T.; Pasanen, P.; Castro, R. Overview of Whole Building Life-Cycle Assessment for Green Building Certification and Ecodesign through Industry Surveys and Interviews. Procedia CIRP 2018, 69, 178-183. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, P.-H. A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis. Energy Build. 2017, 146, 152-159. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Forsberg, A.; von Malmborg, F. Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment. Build. Environ. 2004, 39, 223-228. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Obrecht, T.P.; Röck, M.; Hoxha, E.; Passer, A. BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5534. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zangheri, P.; Armani, R.; Pietrobon, M.; Pagliano, L. Identification of cost-optimal and NZEB refurbishment levels for representa- tive climates and building typologies across Europe. Energy Effic. 2018, 11, 337-369. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Ni, Z.; Chen, S.; Xia, B. An integrated strategy to improve the microclimate regulation of green-blue-grey infrastructures in specific urban forms. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 271, 122555. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wang, H.; Chen, W. Gaps between pre-2020 climate policies with NDC goals and long-term mitigation targets: Analyses on major regions. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 3664-3669. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Piasecki, M. Practical Implementation of the Indoor Environmental Quality Model for the Assessment of Nearly Zero Energy Single-Family Building. Buildings 2019, 9, 214. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Dogruyol, K.; Aziz, Z.; Arayici, Y. Eye of Sustainable Planning: A Conceptual Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration Planning Framework. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1343. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Calzada-Infante, L.; López-Narbona, A.M.; Núñez-Elvira, A.; Orozco-Messana, J. Assessing the Efficiency of Sustainable Cities Using an Empirical Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2618. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Brem, A.; Óg Cusack, D.; Adrita, M.M.; O'Sullivan, D.T.J.; Bruton, K. How do companies certified to ISO 50001 and ISO 14001 perform in LEED and BREEAM assessments? Energy Effic. 2020, 13, 751-766. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hammond, G.P.; Jones, I.C. Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2008, 161, 87-98. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Cheela, V.; John, M.; Biswas, W.; Sarker, P. Combating Urban Heat Island Effect-A Review of Reflective Pavements and Tree Shading Strategies. Buildings 2021, 11, 93. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Siu, C.Y.; Liao, Z. Is building energy simulation based on TMY representative: A comparative simulation study on doe reference buildings in Toronto with typical year and historical year type weather files. Energy Build. 2020, 211, 109760. [CrossRef · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twin Technology Challenges and Applications: A Comprehensive Review
Botín-Sanabria, D. M., Mihaita, A.-S., Peimbert-García, R. E., Ramírez-Moreno, M. A., Ramírez-Mendoza, R. A., & Lozoya-Santos, J. D. J. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14061335 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
- Authors
- Orozco-Messana, J., Iborra-Lucas, M., & Calabuig-Moreno, R.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
- Dpto de Construcciones Arquitectónicas, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain
- Corresponding author
- Orozco-Messana, Javier
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-04-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4654
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3155911838
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council (730283)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
- Keywords
- urban sustainability assessment, digital twin, building certification, open data repositories, Internet of Things, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, Sustainable Development Goals, Valencia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review