Cited by 28Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationSustainable Building Design and Assessment3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications

Neighbourhood Modelling for Urban Sustainability Assessment

Open access
Orozco-Messana, Javier, Iborra-Lucas, Milagro, Calabuig-Moreno, Raimon·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

Climate change is becoming a dominant concern for advanced countries. The Paris Agreement sets out a global framework whose implementation relates to all human activities and is commonly guided by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), which set the scene for sustainable development performance configuring all climate action related policies. Fast control of CO2 emissions necessarily involves cities since they are responsible for 70 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. SDG 11 (Sustainable cities and communities) is clearly involved in the deployment of SDG 13 (Climate Action). European Sustainability policies are financially guided by the European Green Deal for a climate neutral urban environment. In turn, a common framework for urban policy impact assessment must be based on architectural design tools, such as building certification, and common data repositories for standard digital building models. Many Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment (NSA) tools have been developed but the growing availability of open data repositories for cities, together with big-data sources (provided through Internet of Things repositories), allow accurate neighbourhood simulations, or in other words, digital twins of neighbourhoods. These digital twins are excellent tools for policy impact assessment. After a careful analysis of current scientific literature, this paper provides a generic approach for a simple neighbourhood model developed from building physical parameters which meets relevant assessment requirements, while simultaneously being updated (and tested) against real open data repositories, and how this assessment is related to building certification tools. The proposal is validated by real data on energy consumption and on its application to the Benicalap neighbourhood in Valencia (Spain).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13094654

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information flowing from various levels of indicator systems presents a challenge for developing common policies and standards.

    “Furthermore, information flowing from various levels of indicator systems presents a challenge for developing common policies and standards [82].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Peng, Y.; Lai, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, X. An alternative model for measuring the sustainability of urban regeneration: The way forward. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 109, 76-83. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Salat, S. Cities and Forms, on Sustainable Urbanism; CSTB Urban Morphology Laboratory, Hermann Editeurs: Paris, France, 2011; Chapter 3; pp. 241-256.
  3. Mavi, R.K.; Gengatharen, D.; Mavi, N.K.; Hughes, R.; Campbell, A.; Yates, R. Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1932. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Kim, R.; Lim, M.-K.; Roh, S.; Park, W.-J. Analysis of the Characteristics of Environmental Impacts According to the Cut-Off Criteria Applicable to the Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) of Apartment Buildings in South Korea. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2898. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Sharifi, A.; Murayama, A. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 38, 73-87. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Bragança, L.; Mateus, R.; Koukkari, H. Building Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability 2010, 2, 2010-2023. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Bruce-Hyrkäs, T.; Pasanen, P.; Castro, R. Overview of Whole Building Life-Cycle Assessment for Green Building Certification and Ecodesign through Industry Surveys and Interviews. Procedia CIRP 2018, 69, 178-183. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Chen, P.-H. A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis. Energy Build. 2017, 146, 152-159. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Forsberg, A.; von Malmborg, F. Tools for environmental assessment of the built environment. Build. Environ. 2004, 39, 223-228. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Obrecht, T.P.; Röck, M.; Hoxha, E.; Passer, A. BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5534. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Zangheri, P.; Armani, R.; Pietrobon, M.; Pagliano, L. Identification of cost-optimal and NZEB refurbishment levels for representa- tive climates and building typologies across Europe. Energy Effic. 2018, 11, 337-369. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Ni, Z.; Chen, S.; Xia, B. An integrated strategy to improve the microclimate regulation of green-blue-grey infrastructures in specific urban forms. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 271, 122555. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Wang, H.; Chen, W. Gaps between pre-2020 climate policies with NDC goals and long-term mitigation targets: Analyses on major regions. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 3664-3669. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Piasecki, M. Practical Implementation of the Indoor Environmental Quality Model for the Assessment of Nearly Zero Energy Single-Family Building. Buildings 2019, 9, 214. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Dogruyol, K.; Aziz, Z.; Arayici, Y. Eye of Sustainable Planning: A Conceptual Heritage-Led Urban Regeneration Planning Framework. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1343. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Calzada-Infante, L.; López-Narbona, A.M.; Núñez-Elvira, A.; Orozco-Messana, J. Assessing the Efficiency of Sustainable Cities Using an Empirical Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2618. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Brem, A.; Óg Cusack, D.; Adrita, M.M.; O'Sullivan, D.T.J.; Bruton, K. How do companies certified to ISO 50001 and ISO 14001 perform in LEED and BREEAM assessments? Energy Effic. 2020, 13, 751-766. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Hammond, G.P.; Jones, I.C. Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2008, 161, 87-98. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Cheela, V.; John, M.; Biswas, W.; Sarker, P. Combating Urban Heat Island Effect-A Review of Reflective Pavements and Tree Shading Strategies. Buildings 2021, 11, 93. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Siu, C.Y.; Liao, Z. Is building energy simulation based on TMY representative: A comparative simulation study on doe reference buildings in Toronto with typical year and historical year type weather files. Energy Build. 2020, 211, 109760. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orozco-Messana, J., Iborra-Lucas, M., & Calabuig-Moreno, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
  • Dpto de Construcciones Arquitectónicas, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Corresponding author
Orozco-Messana, Javier
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
4654
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3155911838
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (730283)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Keywords
urban sustainability assessment, digital twin, building certification, open data repositories, Internet of Things, energy consumption, CO2 emissions, Sustainable Development Goals, Valencia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review