Cited by 12Biodiesel Production and ApplicationsAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Parametric Study on a Diesel Engine Fuelled Using Waste Cooking Oil Blended with Al2O3 Nanoparticle—Performance, Emission, and Combustion Characteristics

Open access
Ponnusamy, Muruganantham, Ramani, Bharathwaaj, Sathyamruthy, Ravishankar·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

As the environment is humiliated at a disturbing rate, most governments have persistent calls following global energy policies for the utilization of biofuels. This paper essentially examines the portrayal investigations of fatty acid methyl esters and fatty acid pentyl esters obtained from palm oil. The characterization studies such as gas chromatogram, mass spectrometry, and Fourier transformed infrared spectrometry have been performed to study biodiesel’s chemical composition. This article likewise shows biodiesel’s physiochemical properties and concentrates on biodiesel blends’ hypothetical combustion properties with Al2O3 nanoparticles. The spectroscopic investigations demonstrate the contiguity of eight methyl esters and five pentyl esters prevalently of palmitic acid, oleic acid, octanoic acid, and stearic acid. The esters’ nearness was additionally affirmed by the FTIR range, where the peaks in the scope of 1700 cm−1 to 1600 cm−1 can be observed. Looking at the thermophysical properties of the mixes with that of the base diesel fuel yielded the compromising results by giving the comparative density to that of the diesel fuel. The palm oil biodiesel’s calorific value is, by all accounts, diminished by 10% when contrasted with diesel fuel. The addition of the nanoparticles up to 1 g has raised the calorific value most closely to the diesel’s value. Correspondingly, the theoretical burning examinations have demonstrated the limit of biodiesel to go about as an option compared to consistent diesel in the conventional DI–CI engine. This article talks about the combustion attributes of the blend containing 60% diesel, 20% fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), and 20% fatty acid pentyl ester (FAPE) with aluminium oxide (Al2O3) nanoparticles at two distinctive concentrations. This article primarily concerns the inquiry of combustion criterion, such as in-chamber pressure variation, rate of heat release, start of combustion, end of combustion, and ignition delay for considered fuel blends when contrasted with neat diesel fuel in a four-stroke, direct-injection, single-cylinder diesel engine. The results showed a decrease in in-cylinder pressure at all loads of engine operation for biodiesel blends when compared with neat diesel, irrespective of the nanoparticle concentration. Biodiesel blends at all nanoparticle concentrations showed an increase in ignition delay compared with diesel fuels at all engine operation loads. The performance results show a slight deterioration in the engine’s thermal efficiency using biodiesel blends, irrespective of the nanoparticle concentration. Additionally, the emissions show a considerable fall in trends for all loads in contrast with diesel fuel.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13137195

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The consumption of UCO for biofuels surged between 2011 and 2020, driven partly by policy incentives like double counting, significantly increasing reliance on imports, primarily from Asia, raising concerns about feedstock costs, traceability, and potential fraud.

    “Specifically, the consumption of UCO for biofuels surged between 2011 and 2020, driven partly by policy incentives like double counting, but this has significantly increased the reliance on imports, primarily from Asia, raising concerns about feedstock costs, traceability, and potential fraud [260,261].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [261]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The EU's consumption of used cooking oil (UCO) has significantly increased its reliance on imports, primarily from Asia, raising concerns about feedstock costs and traceability.

    “This global dynamic is also reflected in feedstock markets, where policy incentives in one region can drive global trade; for example, the EU's consumption of used cooking oil (UCO) has significantly increased its reliance on imports, primarily from Asia, raising concerns about feedstock costs and traceability [10,260,261].”

    From Biofuels, E-Fuels, and Waste-Derived Fuels: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions (2025) · cites this paper as [261]

    The Introduction and Conclusions discuss using UCO to produce biodiesel, while Future Research mentions manufacturing costs. Searches for EU imports, Asia, feedstock costs, and traceability found no passage addressing the claimed trade pattern or its consequences; the available copy is not truncated. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sudhir, 2007, Potential of UCOs as Biodiesel Feed Stock, Engineering, 12, 69
  2. Raqeeb, 2015, Biodiesel production from UCO, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 7, 670

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ponnusamy, M., Ramani, B., & Sathyamruthy, R.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Information Technology, Nadia 741235, West Bengal, India
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Arasur, Coimbatore 641407, Tamil Nadu, India
Corresponding author
Ponnusamy, Muruganantham
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-26
Volume
13
Issue
13
Pages
7195
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175177234
Cited by
12
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
palm oil biodiesel, fatty acid methyl esters, Al2O3 nanoparticles, diesel engine performance, engine emissions, combustion characteristics, ignition delay, in-cylinder pressure, heat release rate, thermal efficiency, physicochemical properties of biodiesel, calorific value, direct injection diesel engine, biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review