CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strategic Challenges for Sustainable Governance of the Bioeconomy: Preventing Conflict between SDGs

Maksymiv, Yuliia, Yakubiv, Valentyna, Pylypiv, Nadia, Hryhoruk, Iryna, Piatnychuk, Iryna, Popadynets, Nazariy·2021·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su13158308
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The paper analyzes approaches to understanding the concept of the bioeconomy in highly cited journals, and bioeconomy strategies in associations of countries (the OECD and EU) and at the national level. Strategic challenges for sustainable bioeconomy governance are identified and an understanding of this concept is presented. The main aims, such as decoupling, the use of biotechnology, the use of sustainable biomass in the production process, and a high level of corporate social responsibility, are proposed for the identification of industries related to the bioeconomy. Specific goal achievement within the bioeconomy strategy and possible risks of conflict between SDGs are presented in the model. The bioeconomy should be considered a tool for achieving SDGs; the most relevant being 2, 3, 7, 9, 12, and 13–15. However, the achievement of bioeconomy goals can lead to a conflict between SDGs in practice. Therefore, this aspect must be taken into account at the stage of developing bioeconomy strategy and regulated in governance, to prevent conflicts between SDGs and to involve citizens and stakeholders in participating consciously in this process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13158308

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Model of preventing conflict in achieving SDGs by sustainable governance of the bioeFigure 1. Model of preventing conflict in achieving SDGs by sustainable governance of the bioeconomy.
Figure 1 Model of preventing conflict in achieving SDGs by sustainable governance of the bioeFigure 1. Model of preventing conflict in achieving SDGs by sustainable governance of the bioeconomy.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press.
  2. Zilberman, 2018, Economics of Sustainable Development and the Bioeconomy, Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 40, 22, 10.1093/aepp/ppx051 · DOI
  3. 2018, Sustainable development—A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 4170, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157 · DOI
  4. Wisz, 2018, Impact of Advanced Research on Development of Renewable Energy Policy: Case of Ukraine (Review), Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., 8, 2567
  5. Staffas, 2013, Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches, Sustainability, 5, 2751, 10.3390/su5062751 · DOI
  6. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press. · DOI
  7. 1977, What thermodynamics and biology can teach economists, Atl. Econ. J., 5, 13, 10.1007/BF02315384 · DOI
  8. 1977, The Steady State and Ecological Salvation: A Thermodynamic Analysis, Bioscience, XXVII, 266
  9. Missemer, 2017, Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen and Degrowth, Eur. J. Hist. Econ. Thought, 24, 493, 10.1080/09672567.2016.1189945 · DOI
  10. Bobulescu, 2012, The making of a Schumpeterian economist: Nicholas GeorgescuRoegen, Eur. J. Hist. Econ. Thought, 19, 625, 10.1080/09672567.2010.540344 · DOI
  11. Bobulescu, 2015, From Lotka’s biophysics to Georgescu-Roegen’s bioeconomics, Ecol. Econ., 120, 194, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.016 · DOI
  12. Bonaiuti, M. (2011). From Bioeconomics to degrowth. Georgescu-Roegen’s ‘New Economics’ in Eight Essays, Routledge.
  13. Cleveland, 1997, When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process? A survey of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen’s contribution to ecological economics, Ecol. Econ., 22, 203, 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00079-7 · DOI
  14. Kurz, 2003, Fund-flow versus flow-flow in production theory: Reflections on Georgescu-Roegen’s contribution, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 51, 487, 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00143-9 · DOI
  15. Tei, 2018, From Bioeconomics to Bioeconopysis in the Context of (Bio) Diversity and Modern Morality, Amfiteatru Econ., 20, 759, 10.24818/EA/2018/49/754 · DOI
  16. Braun, V., and Sahn, D. (2015). Bioeconomy–Science and Technology Policy to Harmonize Biologization of Economies with Food Security. The Fight against Hunger and Malnutrition, Oxford University Press. · DOI
  17. 2010, Land grabbing. Ursachen und Konsequenzen internationaler Landakquirierung in Entwicklungsländern, Z. Außen Sicherh., 3, 299, 10.1007/s12399-010-0142-y · DOI
  18. Swinnen, 2013, The global bio-economy, Agric. Econ., 44, 1, 10.1111/agec.12045 · DOI
  19. 2017, Environmental and Ecological Aspects in the Overall Assessment of Bioeconomy, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 30, 153, 10.1007/s10806-017-9651-1 · DOI
  20. Gutzler, 2015, Agricultural land use changes—A scenario-based sustainability impact assessment for Brandenburg, Germany, Ecol. Indic., 1, 505, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.004 · DOI
  21. Maksymiv, 2016, Reporting as an important tool in ensuring interaction between stakeholders, Actual Probl. Econ., 4, 304
  22. Boiar, 2018, Towards the theory of supranational finance, Cogent Bus. Manag., 5, 1482594, 10.1080/23311975.2018.1482594 · DOI
  23. Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J., and Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies. Sustainability, 10. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Issa, I., Delbrück, S., and Hamm, U. (2019). Bioeconomy from experts’ perspectives—Results of a global expert survey. PLoS ONE, 14. · DOI
  25. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy as an essentially contested concept, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 544, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Viaggi, D. (2018). The Bioeconomy: Delivering Sustainable Green Growth. Department of Agricultural Sciences (DipSA), CABI. · DOI
  27. Bugge, M., Hansen, T., and Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8. · DOI
  28. Rosegrant, 2013, Water and food in the bioeconomy: Challenges and opportunities for development, Agric. Econ., 44, 139, 10.1111/agec.12058 · DOI
  29. Sheppard, 2011, Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global Bioeconomy, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 3, 4, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.011 · DOI
  30. Birch, 2013, Theorizing the bioeconomy: Biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or... what?, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values, 38, 299, 10.1177/0162243912442398 · DOI
  31. 1998, Genomics and the world’s economy, Science, 281, 925, 10.1126/science.281.5379.925 · DOI
  32. Asada, 2018, Competitive Bioeconomy? Comparing Bio-Based and Non-Bio-Based Primary Sectors of the World, Ecol. Econ., 149, 120, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.014 · DOI
  33. McCormick, 2013, The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview, Sustainability, 5, 2589, 10.3390/su5062589 · DOI
  34. Zabaniotou, 2018, Redesigning a bioenergy sector in EU in the transition to circular waste-based Bioeconomy-A multidisciplinary review, J. Clean. Prod., 177, 197, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.172 · DOI
  35. Pylypiv, 2020, Balanced scorecard for implementing united territorial communities’ social responsibility, Probl. Perspect. Manag., 18, 128
  36. Yakubiv, 2019, Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the Context of Energy Management, J. Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian Natl. Univ., 6, 77, 10.15330/jpnu.6.3-4.77-87 · DOI
  37. Yakubiv, 2020, Application of Economic and Legal Instruments at the Stage of Transition to Bioeconomy, Proceedings of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering, Volume 965, 656
  38. Popadynets, 2016, Development of the market of solid biofuel in Ukraine under current conditions, Econ. Ann.-XXI, 159, 93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Maksymiv, Y., Yakubiv, V., Pylypiv, N., Hryhoruk, I., Piatnychuk, I., & Popadynets, N.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
13
Issue
15
Pages
8308
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su13158308
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic Challenges for Sustainable Governance of the Bioeconomy: Preventing Conflict between SDGs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su13158308
The paper
Maksymiv, Y., Yakubiv, V., Pylypiv, N., Hryhoruk, I., Piatnychuk, I., & Popadynets, N. (2021). Strategic Challenges for Sustainable Governance of the Bioeconomy: Preventing Conflict between SDGs. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158308