The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies
Abstract
More than forty states worldwide currently pursue explicit political strategies to expand and promote their bioeconomies. This paper assesses these strategies in the context of the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Our theoretical framework differentiates between four pathways of bioeconomic developments. The extent to which bioeconomic developments along these pathways lead to increased sustainability depends on the creation of effective governance mechanisms. We distinguish between enabling governance and constraining governance as the two fundamental political challenges in setting up an effective governance framework for a sustainable bioeconomy. Further, we lay out a taxonomy of political support measures (enabling governance) and regulatory tools (constraining governance) that states can use to confront these two political challenges. Guided by this theoretical framework, we conduct a qualitative content analysis of 41 national bioeconomy strategies to provide systematic answers to the question of how well designed the individual national bioeconomy strategies are to ensure the rise of a sustainable bioeconomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The transformation path (TP) is described by Dietz et al. [1] as the root cause of hurdles in the successful implementation of the circular bioeconomy.”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This research demonstrates that these bioeconomy transformation paths and governance strategies are applicable to the circular bioeconomy as well as the broader conceptualization of bio-based economies (as applied by Dietz et al. [1]) and applicable at the regional level as well as the national level (as analyzed in the research of Dietz et al. [1]).”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Dietz et al. [1] have delineated a taxonomy of political support measures (enabling governance) as the primary governance challenge, and regulatory tools (constraining governance) as the secondary governance challenge, thereby distinguishing between the two fundamental political challenges in establishing an effective governance framework for a sustainable bioeconomy.”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Dietz et al. [1] distinguish three enabling governance mechanisms (Table 3):”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Managing conflicts in goals and effectively addressing conflicting objectives represent the second governance challenge, known as constraining governance.”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“The typology of circular bioeconomy governance models shown in this paper is built upon this theoretical framework, further elaborating on its structure.”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Path dependencies have been underscored as the primary obstacles to the effective realization of the circular bioeconomy.”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“This research demonstrates that these bioeconomy transformation paths and governance strategies are applicable to the circular bioeconomy as well as the broader conceptualization of bio-based economies (as applied by Dietz et al. [1]) and applicable at the regional level as well as the national level (as analyzed in the research of Dietz et al. [1]).”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Generally, the regions tended to address the second fundamental challenge of developing a sustainable circular bioeconomy (constraining governance) to a considerably lesser extent than the first challenge (enabling governance), aligning with previous findings by Dietz et al. [1].”
From Governance Strategies for Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy Development in Europe: Insights and Typologies (2024) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research
Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031222 · Cited by 398 · cited 1×
“However, recent studies emphasize the dependence of a sustainable bioeconomy on technical, economic, and social prerequisites that the bioeconomy itself cannot create [2].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- McCormick, 2015, Towards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies, Sustainability, 7, 10461, 10.3390/su70810461 · DOI
- Von Braun, J., and Birner, R. (2016). Designing Global Governance for Agricultural Development and Food and Nutrition Security. Rev. Dev. Econ., 21. · DOI
- Barben, 2017, Policy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy, Nature, 535, 221
- Bosman, R., and Rotmans, J. (2016). Transition Governance towards a Bioeconomy: A Comparison of Finland and The Netherlands. Sustainability, 8. · DOI · Paper page
- Purkus, 2015, Handling Uncertainty in Bioenergy Policy Design—A Case Study Analysis of UK and German Bioelectricity Policy Instruments, Biomass Bioenergy, 79, 54, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.029 · DOI
- Pannicke, 2015, The political economy of fostering a wood-based bioeconomy in Germany, Ger. J. Agric. Econ., 64, 224
- Pietszch, J. (2017). Kriterien für den Erfolg der Bioökonomie. Bioökonomie für Einsteiger, Springer Spektrum. · DOI
- 1999, Judicialization and the construction of governance, Comp. Polit. Stud., 32, 147, 10.1177/0010414099032002001 · DOI
- Ceddia, 2014, Governance, agricultural intensification, and land sparing in tropical South America, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7242, 10.1073/pnas.1317967111 · DOI
- Ceddia, 2013, Sustainable agricultural intensification or Jevons paradox? The role of public governance in tropical South America, Glob. Environ. Chang., 23, 1052, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Searchinger, 2015, Do biofuel policies seek to cut emissions by cutting food?, Science, 347, 1420, 10.1126/science.1261221 · DOI
- Lobell, 2013, Climate adaptation as mitigation. The case of agricultural investments, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 1, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015012 · DOI
- Angelsen, A., and Kaimowitz, D. (2001). Agricultural Technologies and Tropical Deforestation, CABI Publishing in Association with Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). · DOI
- Herring, 2007, Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect, Technovation, 27, 194, 10.1016/j.technovation.2006.11.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Smeets, 2013, The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 38, 393, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.035 · DOI
- Unruh, 2002, Escaping Carbon Lock-in, Energy Policy, 30, 317, 10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00098-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Unruh, 2000, Understanding Carbon Lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, 817, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interests in International Society, Cornell University Press. · DOI
- Dabbert, S., Lewandowski, I., Weiss, J., and Pyka, A. (2017). Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy: Technological and Economic Perspectives, Springer. · DOI
- Cooke, P. (2007). Growth Cultures: The Global Bioeconomy and Its Bioregions, Routledge.
- Kleinschmit, 2017, Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses, Int. For. Rev., 19, 41
- Pietszch, J. (2017). Die Bedingungen einer nachhaltigen Bioökonomie. Bioökonomie für Einsteiger, Springer Spektrum. · DOI
- Sahn, D. (2015). Bioeconomy–Science and Technology Policy to Harmonize Biologization of Economies with Food Security. The Fight against Hunger and Malnutrition, Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 2010, “Land Grabbing”. Ursachen und Konsequenzen internationaler Landakquirierung in Entwicklungsländern, Z. Außen Sicherh., 3, 299, 10.1007/s12399-010-0142-y · DOI
- Swinnen, 2013, The global bio-economy, Agric. Econ., 44, 1, 10.1111/agec.12045 · DOI
- Downsborough, 2017, When policy hits reality: Structure, agency and power in South African water governance, Soc. Nat. Resour., 30, 521, 10.1080/08941920.2016.1268658 · DOI
- Baylis, 2017, The effectiveness of payments for environmental services, World Dev., 96, 359, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020 · DOI
- Auld, G., Balboa, C., Bernstein, S., and Cashore, B. (2009). The Emergence of Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) Global Environmental Governance: A Cross Sectoral Assessment, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Wild, P.J., McMahon, C., Darlington, M., Liu, S., and Culley, S. (2009). A diary study of information needs and document usage in the engineering domain. Des. Stud. · DOI
- Wesseler, 2017, Measuring the Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies, Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 9, 275, 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053701 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kee, S. H., Chiongson, J. B. V., Saludes, J. P., Vigneswari, S., Ramakrishna, S., & Bhubalan, K. (2021) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116311 · Cited by 94
Skondras, A., Nastis, S. A., Skalidi, I., Theofilou, A., Bakousi, A., Mone, T., Tsifodimou, Z. E., Gaffey, J., Ludgate, R., O’Connor, T., et al. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16125140 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J. J., & Von Braun, J.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-09-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3190
- ISSN
- 2071-1050
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (031 B0019 STRIVE)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
