Sustainable Public Procurement in Large Infrastructure Projects—Policy Implementation for Carbon Emission Reductions
Open accessAbstract
The infrastructure construction sector is a significant source of carbon emissions, and more stringent procurement requirements are central to meeting reduction targets in this demand-led and project-based industry. This paper aims to analyze the implementation of international policies for reducing carbon emissions in infrastructure construction, focusing on the interaction between policy ambitions and procurement practices. Based on case studies of large projects and their contexts in five countries worldwide: Australia, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the US, a cross-country comparison is performed of how policies and practices for carbon reduction develop across multiple implementation levels. Three levels are included in the analysis: policy, industry, and project level. We identify the projects as either drivers of policy goals, frontrunners in industry-level development processes, or translators of national policy. These roles, and the associated pathways for carbon emission reduction, are context-specific and depend on the policy ambitions at the national or regional level, the maturity of the supplier market, and, often, on the strategies of individual champions at the project level. Long-term learning processes, both within and between the various levels, are essential for advancing carbon reduction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comprehension of related benefits from GPP is a facilitator of GPP.
“Comprehension of related benefits from GPP Lingegård et al. (2021)”
From Green public procurement as an effective way for sustainable development: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Lingegård et al. (2021)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Lingegård, S., Olsson, J. A., Kadefors, A., & Uppenberg, S.
- Affiliations
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Lund University (SE)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- WSP Sverige (Sweden) (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Lingegård, Sofia
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-10-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11182
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3206596908
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The Swedish research council Formas (254-2013-1837)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Construction Management and Sustainability
- Keywords
- sustainable public procurement, carbon emission reduction, large-scale infrastructure projects, infrastructure construction, policy implementation, procurement requirements, cross-national comparison, policy learning, green purchasing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review