CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis

Owojori, Oluwatobi, Okoro, Chioma, Chileshe, Nicholas·2021·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su132111646
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The emerging demand for sustainable development and the need for efficient use of resources across the built environment have stirred research efforts globally. The construction sector is often regarded as one of the major world consumers of resources, so many international establishments are trying to create a sustainable environment through adaptive reuse of existing building stocks, a concept which has been receiving momentous recognition by reason of its richly diversified applicability for circular economy. Thus, profound knowledge of the topic and research trends is requisite to promote scholarship. For this analysis, the global research developments in adaptive reuse are assessed according to published documents, co-authorship, geographical distribution and keyword- co-occurrences. From the Scopus directory, 227 journal articles published from 2006 to 2021 were retrieved. Results showed that from 2006, published documents rose by 221 articles. About 29% of the publications were from Italy and the United Kingdom. Among the articles, 110 were from the subject area of environmental science (48.5%), while the subject area of engineering represents 104 publications (45.8%). Recent progress in adaptive reuse in building and construction includes, but not limited to: (i) component and materials reuse and technology, (ii) life cycle assessment, (iii) economic assessment and multi-criteria decision making and (iv) regulatory policies and stakeholders’ analysis. The findings are important to furnish all relevant personnel in the academic and industries with a broad perception of the status and potential emerging trends on the adaptive reuse of buildings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su132111646

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The research framework. Figure 1. The research framework.
Figure 1 The research framework. Figure 1. The research framework.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Annual publication. Figure 2. Annual publication.
Figure 2 Annual publication. Figure 2. Annual publication.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Document type. Figure 3. Document type.
Figure 3 Document type. Figure 3. Document type.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Geographical distribution of publications. Figure 4. Geographical distribution of publications.
Figure 4 Geographical distribution of publications. Figure 4. Geographical distribution of publications.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 The subject area of published documents. Figure 5. The subject area of published documents.
Figure 5 The subject area of published documents. Figure 5. The subject area of published documents.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 A bibliometric chart created according to author key-words co-occurrence with overlay visualization mode. The least occurrences of a keyword were set at 5. Figure 6. A bibliometric chart created according to author key-words co-occurrence with overlay visualization mode. The least occurrences of a keyword were set at 5.
Figure 6 A bibliometric chart created according to author key-words co-occurrence with overlay visualization mode. The least occurrences of a keyword were set at 5. Figure 6. A bibliometric chart created according to author key-words co-occurrence with overlay visualization mode. The least occurrences of a keyword were set at 5.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Abastante, F., Lami, I., and Gaballo, M. (2021). Pursuing the SDG11 targets: The role of the sustainability protocols. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  2. Pintossi, N., Kaya, D.I., and Roders, A.P. (2021). Assessing cultural heritage adaptive reuse practices: Multi-scale challenges and solutions in Rijeka. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  3. Viola, S., and Diano, D. (2019). Repurposing the built environment: Emerging challenges and key entry points for future research. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  4. Butina-Watson, G., and Bentley, I. (2007). Identity by Design, Routledge. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  5. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., and Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gosling, 2013, Adaptable buildings: A systems approach, Sustain. Cities Soc., 7, 44, 10.1016/j.scs.2012.11.002 · DOI
  7. Abdulameer, 2020, Adaptive reuse as an approach to sustainability, IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng., 881, 012010, 10.1088/1757-899X/881/1/012010 · DOI
  8. Perera, 2019, Adaptive reuse of buildings: The case of Sri Lanka, J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr., 24, 79
  9. Wijesiri, W.M.M., Devapriya, K.A.K., Rathnasiri, P., and Karunaratne, T.L.W. (2021). A framework to implement green adaptive reuse for existing buildings in Sri Lanka. Intell. Build. Int., 1–25. · DOI
  10. Zulkanain, 2021, Exploring the adaptive reuse concept and benefits in managing public building quarters in Malaysia, Malays. Constr. Res. J., 12, 258
  11. Langston, 2007, Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong, Build. Environ., 43, 1709, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017 · DOI
  12. Remoy, 2014, Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: Opportunities and risks, Build. Res. Inf., 42, 381, 10.1080/09613218.2014.865922 · DOI
  13. Vural, 2008, An example to renovation–revitalization works in historical city centres: Kunduracılar Street/Trabzon-Turkey, Build. Environ., 43, 950, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.053 · DOI
  14. Shen, 2010, Adaptive reuse potential, Facilities, 28, 6, 10.1108/02632771011011369 · DOI
  15. Günçe, K., and Mısırlısoy, D. (2019). Assessment of adaptive reuse practices through user experiences: Traditional houses in the walled city of Nicosia. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  16. Kalaci, E., and Dervishi, S. (2014, January 8–10). Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of a heritage building in Tirana, Albania. Proceedings of the 2nd ICAUD International Conference in Architecture and Urban Design, Tirana, Albania.
  17. Mohamed, 2017, Adaptive reuse: A review and analysis of its relationship to the 3 Es of sustainability, Facilities, 35, 138, 10.1108/F-12-2014-0108 · DOI
  18. Kalibatas, 2019, A bibliometric data analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods in heritage buildings, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 25, 76, 10.3846/jcem.2019.8315 · DOI
  19. Plevoets, B., and van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage, Routledge. · DOI
  20. Bullen, 2007, Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings, Facilities, 25, 20, 10.1108/02632770710716911 · DOI
  21. Li, 2021, Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: A review, Built Herit., 5, 1
  22. Farjami, E., and Türker, Ö.O. (2021). The extraction of prerequisite criteria for environmentally certified adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  23. Foster, G., and Saleh, R. (2021). The adaptive reuse of cultural heritage in European circular city plans: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  24. Gravagnuolo, A., Micheletti, S., and Bosone, M. (2021). A participatory approach for “circular” adaptive reuse of cultural heritage. Building a heritage community in Salerno, Italy. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  25. Joensuu, 2020, Circular economy practices in the built environment, J. Clean. Prod., 276, 124215, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124215 · DOI
  26. Marika, G., Beatrice, M., and Francesca, A. (2021). Adaptive reuse and sustainability protocols in Italy: Relationship with circular economy. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  27. Pimonsathean, 2002, Current issues concerning adaptive reuse in the conservation of urban cultural heritage, RC Rev. Cult. Rev. Cult., 4, 45
  28. Bullen, 2011, Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings, Structural Survey, 29, 411, 10.1108/02630801111182439 · DOI
  29. Sandberg, 2011, Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization?, Organization, 18, 23, 10.1177/1350508410372151 · DOI
  30. Mostafa, 2016, Lean and agile integration within offsite construction using discrete event simulation: A systematic literature review, Constr. Innov., 16, 483, 10.1108/CI-09-2014-0043 · DOI
  31. Song, 2020, A bibliometric analysis of worldwide educational artificial intelligence research development in recent twenty years, Asia Pac. Educ. Rev., 21, 473, 10.1007/s12564-020-09640-2 · DOI
  32. Ahmadvand, 2019, Trends and visibility of “digital health” as a keyword in articles by JMIR publications in the new millennium: Bibliographic-bibliometric analysis, J. Med. Internet Res., 21, e10477, 10.2196/10477 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Benckendorff, 2013, A network analysis of tourism research, Ann. Tour. Res., 43, 121, 10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005 · DOI
  34. Gallego-Valero, L., Moral-Parajes, E., and Román-Sánchez, I. (2021). Wastewater treatment costs: A research overview through bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  35. Mihalic, T., Mohamadi, S., Abbasi, A., and Dávid, L. (2021). Mapping a sustainable and responsible tourism paradigm: A bibliometric and citation network analysis. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  36. Alkahtani, M., Ziout, A., Salah, B., Alatefi, M., Elgawad, A.E.E.A., Badwelan, A., and Syarif, U. (2021). An insight into reverse logistics with a focus on collection systems. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  37. Su, Z., Zhang, M., and Wu, W. (2021). Visualizing sustainable supply chain management: A systematic scientometric review. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  38. Li, 2015, Mapping publication trends and identifying hot spots of research on internet health information seeking behavior: A quantitative and co-word biclustering analysis, J. Med. Internet Res., 17, e81, 10.2196/jmir.3326 · DOI
  39. Hosseini, 2018, Analysis of citation networks in building information modeling research, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 144, 04018064, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001492 · DOI
  40. Olawumi, 2017, Evolution in the intellectual structure of bim research: A bibliometric analysis, J. Civ. Eng. Manag., 23, 1060, 10.3846/13923730.2017.1374301 · DOI
  41. Cobo, 2011, Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 62, 1382, 10.1002/asi.21525 · DOI
  42. Vigneshkumar, 2020, A scientometric analysis and review of fall from height research in construction, Constr. Econ. Build., 20, 17
  43. Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., and Wolfram, D. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice, Springer. · DOI
  44. Foster, 2020, Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 152, 104507, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104507 · DOI
  45. Vecchio, 2020, Promoting adaptive reuse in Ontario: A planning policy tool for making the best of manufacturing decline, Urban Plan., 5, 338, 10.17645/up.v5i3.3188 · DOI
  46. Wilkinson, S., James, K., and Reed, R. (2009, January 18–21). Delivering sustainability through the adaptive reuse of commercial buildings: The Melbourne CBD challenge. Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society 15th Annual Conference, Sydney, Australia.
  47. Macknight, E.C. (2021, August 20). Introduction, Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques. Available online: https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/historical-reflections/47/1/hrrh470101.xml. · DOI
  48. De Medici, S. (2021). Italian architectural heritage and photovoltaic systems. matching style with sustainability. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  49. Department of Environment (2021, August 20). The Australian Government Department of Environment, Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.environment.gov.au%2Fheritage.
  50. Halog, A., and Anieke, S. (2021). A review of circular economy studies in developed countries and its potential adoption in developing countries. Circ. Econ. Sustain., 1–22. · DOI
  51. Douglas, J. (2006). Building Adaptation, Butterworth-Heinemann. [2nd ed.]. · DOI
  52. Thornton, 2011, The greenest building (is the one that you don’t build!): Effective techniques for sustainable adaptive reuse/renovation, J. Green Build., 6, 1, 10.3992/jgb.6.1.1 · DOI
  53. Wilkinson, 2014, The preliminary assessment of adaptation potential in existing office buildings, Int. J. Strat. Prop. Manag., 18, 77, 10.3846/1648715X.2013.853705 · DOI
  54. Hsueh, 2013, DFAHP multicriteria risk assessment model for redeveloping derelict public buildings, Int. J. Strat. Prop. Manag., 17, 333, 10.3846/1648715X.2013.852995 · DOI
  55. Tan, 2014, A Fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong, Int. J. Strat. Prop. Manag., 18, 66, 10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718 · DOI
  56. Tu, H.-M. (2020). The attractiveness of adaptive heritage reuse: A theoretical framework. Sustainabilty, 12. · DOI
  57. Dewiyana, 2016, The green aspects of adaptive reuse of Hotel Penaga, Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci., 222, 631, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.220 · DOI
  58. Parpas, 2020, On the determinants of a successful, sustainable-driven adaptive reuse: A multiple regression approach, Int. J. Sus. Dev. Plann., 15, 1
  59. Kaya, 2021, Subjective circularity performance analysis of adaptive heritage reuse practices in the Netherlands, Sustain. Cities Soc., 70, 102869, 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102869 · DOI
  60. Oppio, A., Bottero, M., and Ferretti, V. (2017). Designing adaptive reuse strategies for cultural heritage with choice experiments. Energy Performance in the Australian Built Environment, Springer. · DOI
  61. Della Spina, L. (2020). Adaptive sustainable reuse for cultural heritage: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach supporting urban development processes. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  62. Salerno, E. (2020). Identifying value-increasing actions for cultural heritage assets through sensitivity analysis of multicriteria evaluation results. Sustainability, 12. · DOI
  63. Wilkinson, 2011, Examining and quantifying the drivers behind alterations and extensions to commercial buildings in a central business district, Constr. Manag. Econ., 29, 725, 10.1080/01446193.2011.588954 · DOI
  64. Laefer, 2008, Building reuse assessment for sustainable urban reconstruction, J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 134, 217, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:3(217) · DOI
  65. Shao, 2019, Design for sustainability and innovation: A kansei engineering evaluation of the adaptive reuse of old buildings, Proc. Des. Soc. Int. Conf. Eng. Des., 1, 3221, 10.1017/dsi.2019.329 · DOI
  66. Hsu, 2016, Ann-based decision model for the reuse of vacant buildings in urban areas, Int. J. Strat. Prop. Manag., 20, 31, 10.3846/1648715X.2015.1101626 · DOI
  67. Pinto, 2017, Building reuse: Multi-criteria assessment for compatible design, Int. J. Des. Sci. Technol., 22, 165
  68. Bottero, M., D’Alpaos, C., and Oppio, A. (2019). Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
  69. Lombardi, 2017, Case studies of environmental the quality of buildings damaged by earthquakes, prior to adaptive reconstruction: Palazzo moscardelli in ofena and ex-colonia ix maggio at Monteluco Di Roio, L’aquila, Italy, WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., 226, 59, 10.2495/SDP170061 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Owojori, O., Okoro, C., & Chileshe, N.
Affiliations
  • Department of Finance and Investment Management, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
  • UniSA STEM, Scarce Resources and Circular Economy (ScaRCE), University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
13
Issue
21
Pages
11646
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su132111646
Cited by
53
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review