Cited by 6Public Procurement and PolicyUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Urban Public Food Procurement in Kiambu and Machakos Counties as a Driver of Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainability: A Literature Review and Case Studies

Open access
Xie, Julian Z., Demmler, Kathrin M., Trevenen-Jones, Ann, Brownell, Kelly D.·2022·Sustainability

Abstract

Urban public food procurement can address malnutrition and improve the beneficiary experience at public institutions whilst reshaping food systems to be healthier and more sustainable. We reviewed grey and peer-reviewed literature on urban public food procurement in Kiambu and Machakos counties in Kenya. From the literature, we selected programmes for case study research through stakeholder interviews and targeted literature searching. We searched 11 databases and reviewed 23 relevant articles. The case studies involved early childhood education centre and primary school feeding, hospital food provision, and COVID-19 responses. We found that actionable data and public–private partnerships are enabling factors. Similarly, multistakeholder involvement and governance increase coordination. However, budget constraints threaten programme stability. Procurement criteria focused on nutrition, food quality, and community development, but did not explicitly include environmental sustainability. We linked case studies to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, and 12. By developing, improving, and scaling public food procurement, urban governments in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) can reach the most vulnerable whilst improving farmer livelihoods, creating business opportunities, and addressing environmental concerns. This paper contributes implementational insights in Kenyan urban contexts by highlighting opportunities for local and regional policymakers in LMICs and their partners to strengthen public food procurement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su14063341

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, J. Z., Demmler, K. M., Trevenen-Jones, A., & Brownell, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Benefits Data Trust (US)
  • Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (CH)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Xie, Julian Z.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-12
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
3341
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220737317
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (N/A)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
food and nutrition security, school meals, public-private partnerships, multi-stakeholder governance, Sustainable Development Goals, environmental sustainability, farmer livelihoods, Kiambu County, Machakos County, Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review