CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Education during COVID-19 pandemicEducational Innovations and TechnologyOnline Learning Methods and Innovations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socioeconomic Status of University Students as a Limiting Factor for Various Forms of Distance Education during COVID-19 Measures

Open access
Chytrý, Vlastimil, Kubiatko, Milan, Šindelářová, Romana, Medová, Janka·2022·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su14105898
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influences and impacts of the socioeconomic status (SES) of families on university students and their studies during anti-pandemic measures resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Another aspect of the study was to investigate the various educational elements used during the course of distance teaching. This research was performed on a sample of 1280 respondents. Statistically significant differences in the case of SES grades were observed only with the following variables: (i) difficulty factor for the combined education form, (ii) age, and (iii) the duration of the teaching practice (p<0.05). The post-hoc analysis (LSD test) did not show a linear trend in the sense that the values of the respective variables also increased as the SES increased. These data proved that the higher the economic status of the family, the lower the value of the variable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su14105898

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hnilica, 2006, Influences of socio-economic status and natural disaster on health and life satisfaction, Cesk. Psychol., 5, 16
  2. Kempf-Leonard, K. (2005). Alpha reliability. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Elsevier. [1st ed.].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 13

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chytrý, V., Kubiatko, M., Šindelářová, R., & Medová, J.
Affiliations
  • Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem (CZ)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (SK)
Corresponding author
  • Chytrý, Vlastimil
  • Medová, Janka
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-05-12
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
5898
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/su14105898
OpenAlex
W4280594320
Cited by
12
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Smart City—Smart Region—Smart Community (N. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007435)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online Learning Methods and Innovations
Keywords
socioeconomic status, university students, distance education, COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, blended learning, family economic status, student age, teaching experience, educational inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review