The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Product Passport: A Pathway to Circularity and Sustainability in Modern Manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
The primary aim of this study is to explore and understand the potential benefits and applications of the Digital Product Passport (DPP) system within the modern manufacturing industry. To achieve this, we developed a unique methodology, model, and a template for creating a DPP, identifying the key characteristics essential for effective implementation. Our approach involved an analysis of the literature and the formulation of a unified DPP framework, tailored to enhance supply chain transparency and support sustainable manufacturing practices. The empirical findings from our research demonstrate the DPP’s impact on supply chain transparency, providing crucial product lifecycle information that bolsters decision-making and facilitates optimal resource management. Additionally, our study suggests that the DPP model, when applied to sectors such as electronics manufacturing, promises transformative results. This research underpins the pivotal role of DPPs in the future of manufacturing, highlighting their potential to catalyze a shift towards greater transparency and sustainability. Actionable guidelines are provided for manufacturers considering the adoption of this innovative system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In materials management, DPP can improve traceability of materials including hazardous and critical materials, reduce cost in material/component reuse, and improve supply security by enabling more effective use of secondary raw materials (Adisorn, Tholen, and Götz 2021; Psarommatis and May 2024).”
From Digital product passport for sustainable and circular supply chain management: a structured review of use cases (2024) · cites this paper as Psarommatis and May 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In materials management, DPP can improve traceability of materials including hazardous and critical materials, reduce cost in material/component reuse, and improve supply security by enabling more effective use of secondary raw materials (Adisorn, Tholen, and Götz 2021; Psarommatis and May 2024).”
From Digital product passport for sustainable and circular supply chain management: a structured review of use cases (2024) · cites this paper as Psarommatis and May 2024
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In materials management, DPP can improve traceability of materials including hazardous and critical materials, reduce cost in material/component reuse, and improve supply security by enabling more effective use of secondary raw materials (Adisorn, Tholen, and Götz 2021; Psarommatis and May 2024).”
From Digital product passport for sustainable and circular supply chain management: a structured review of use cases (2024) · cites this paper as Psarommatis and May 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targets for a circular economy
Morseletto, P. (2019) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104553 · Cited by 1,651
Industry 5.0: Prospect and retrospect
Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wuest, T., Mourtzis, D., & Wang, L. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017 · Cited by 1,401
Security of smart manufacturing systems
Tuptuk, N., & Hailes, S. M. V. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.04.007 · Cited by 495
Zero defect manufacturing: state-of-the-art review, shortcomings and future directions in research
Psarommatis, F., May, G., Dreyfus, P.-A., & Kiritsis, D. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1605228 · Cited by 420
Self-citationRajaeifar, M. A., Ghadimi, P., Raugei, M., Wu, Y., & Heidrich, O. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106144 · Cited by 376
Drivers and barriers in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy
Neves, S. A., & Marques, A. C. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130865 · Cited by 369
Life‐Cycle Assessment Considerations for Batteries and Battery Materials
Porzio, J., & Scown, C. D. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202100771 · Cited by 345
Towards a digital product passport fit for contributing to a circular economy
Adisorn, T., Tholen, L., & Götz, T. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14082289 · Cited by 313
Digital product passports as enabler of the circular economy
Walden, J., Steinbrecher, A., & Marinkovic, M. (2021) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.202100121 · Cited by 252
Digital product passports for a circular economy: Data needs for product life cycle decision-making
Jensen, S. F., Kristensen, J. H., Adamsen, S., Christensen, A., & Waehrens, B. V. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.02.021 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, A., & Seuring, S. (2024) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2024.2374256 · Cited by 158
“In materials management, DPP can improve traceability of materials including hazardous and critical materials, reduce cost in material/component reuse, and improve supply security by enabling more effective use of secondary raw materials (Adisorn, Tholen, and Götz 2021; Psarommatis and May 2024).”
Psarommatis, F., May, G., & Azamfirei, V. (2025) · Journal of remanufacturing · doi:10.1007/s13243-025-00153-y · Cited by 80
Self-citationLife-Cycle Assessment in Agri-Food Systems and the Wine Industry—A Circular Economy Perspective
Marques, C., Güneş, S., Vilela, A., & Gomes, R. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14091553 · Cited by 76
Digital Product Passport: A Review and Research Agenda
Lopes, C., & Barata, J. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.517 · Cited by 75
Kuhn, M., Baumann, M., Volz, F., & Stojanović, L. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17030969 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Psarommatis, F., & May, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of North Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Psarommatis, Foivos
- May, Gökan
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-01-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 396
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390506356
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 64 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 13
- FWCI
- 41.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- projects PLOOTO and RE4DY, EU H2020 projects (101092008, 101,058,384)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
- Keywords
- digital product passport, circular economy, sustainable manufacturing, supply chain transparency, product lifecycle information, electronics manufacturing, resource management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
