Cited by 28Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism StudiesCultural Heritage Management and PreservationLandscape and Cultural Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Identifying Rural Landscape Heritage Character Types and Areas: A Case Study of the Li River Basin in Guilin, China

Open access
Hong, Zizhen, Cao, Wentao, Chen, Ying, Zhu, Sijia, Zheng, Wenjun·2024·Sustainability

Abstract

Rural landscape heritage faces issues of landscape character homogenization and unclear protection boundaries. We propose combining landscape character assessment (LCA) methods to identify the characteristics and areas of heritage, aiming to preserve the diversity and integrity of the landscape. This paper focuses on the Li River Basin as the study area, presenting a method for identifying characteristics and areas of rural landscape heritage. It is divided into four steps: selection and spatial scope identification of rural landscape heritage, identification of natural character areas, identification of cultural character areas, and identification and analysis of character areas of rural landscape heritage. Firstly, cultural relic units, traditional villages, and intangible cultural heritage as sources of rural landscape heritage were selected by utilizing the Minimum Cumulative Resistance model (MCR) to calculate the spatial scope of rural landscape heritage. Secondly, clustering and automatic partition methods were employed to classify the Li River Basin into four types of natural character areas. Thirdly, cultural core areas and buffer areas were determined based on the heritage source hierarchy and cultural features. Fourthly, by overlaying heritage spatial ranges, natural character areas, and cultural character areas, 2 levels of heritage areas, 7 types of heritage cultural areas, and 43 heritage character units were obtained. This method not only provides a comprehensive framework for the identification of characteristics and areas for rural landscape heritage but also enhances the integrity of data selection in landscape character assessment methods at the cultural level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su16041626

Cites

42 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to its rich natural and cultural landscape, rural tourism destinations can not only effectively improve the mood of tourists, but also stimulate their deep emotional resonance of the destination, so as to bring a deeper restorative experience.

    “Due to its rich natural and cultural landscape, rural tourism destinations can not only effectively improve the mood of tourists, but also stimulate their deep emotional resonance of the destination, so as to bring a deeper restorative experience (Chi and Han, 2021; Hong et al., 2024).”

    From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Hong et al., 2024

    The Introduction and §4.2 describe rural landscapes as combining natural and cultural elements. They do not address whether rural tourism improves tourists’ moods, creates emotional resonance, or provides a restorative experience; searches for those effects found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ICOMOS International (1964). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Chapter), ICOMOS International.
  2. Zhang, 2023, Identification of Rural Landscape Character in Jinyuan District, Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, Landsc. Archit., 30, 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hong, Z., Cao, W., Chen, Y., Zhu, S., & Zheng, W.
Affiliations
  • Southwest Forestry University (CN)
  • Guilin University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Wenjun
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-02-16
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1626
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391883539
Cited by
25
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8
FWCI
72.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Guangxi Key Research and Development Plan Project (AB22080057, AB23026053)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Urbanism, Landscape, and Tourism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Landscape and Cultural Studies
Keywords
landscape character assessment, traditional villages, intangible cultural heritage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review