The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuel Consumption Prediction for Full Flight Phases Toward Sustainable Aviation: A DMPSO-LSTM Model Using Quick Access Recorder (QAR) Data
Open accessAbstract
Reducing emissions in the aviation industry remains a critical challenge for global low-carbon transition. Accurate fuel consumption prediction is essential to achieving emission reduction targets and advancing sustainable development in aviation. Aircraft fuel consumption is influenced by numerous complex factors during flight, resulting in significant nonlinear relationships between segment-specific variables and fuel usage. Traditional statistical and econometric models struggle to capture these relationships effectively. This article first focuses on the different characteristics of QAR data and uses the Adaptive Noise Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (CEEMDAN) method to obtain more significant potential features of QAR data, solving the problems of mode aliasing and uneven mode gaps that may occur in traditional decomposition methods when processing non-stationary signals. Secondly, a dynamic multidimensional particle swarm optimization algorithm (DMPSO) was constructed using an adaptive adjustment dynamic change method of inertia weight and learning factor, which solved the problem of local extremum and low search accuracy in the solution space that PSO algorithm is prone to during the optimization process. Then, a DMPSO-LSTM aircraft fuel consumption model was established to achieve fuel consumption prediction for three flight segments: climb, cruise, and descent. The final proposed model was validated on real-world datasets, and the results showed that it outperformed other baseline models such as BP, RNN, PSO-LSTM, etc. Among the results, the climbing segment MAE index decreased by more than 40%, the RMSE index decreased by more than 38%, and the R2 index increased by more than 6%, respectively. The MAE index of the cruise segment decreased by more than 40%, the RMSE index decreased by more than 40%, and the R2 index increased by more than 5%, respectively. The MAE index of the descending segment decreased by more than 20%, the RMSE index decreased by more than 30%, and the R2 index increased by more than 5%, respectively. The improved prediction accuracy can be used to implement multi-criteria optimization in flight operations: (1) by quantifying weight–fuel relationships, it supports payload–fuel tradeoff decisions; (2) enhanced phase-specific predictions allow optimized climb/cruise profile selections, balancing time and fuel use; and (3) precise consumption estimates facilitate optimal fuel-loading decisions, minimizing safety margins. The high-precision fuel consumption prediction framework proposed in this study provides actionable insights for airlines to optimize flight operations and design low-carbon route strategies, thereby accelerating the aviation industry’s transition toward net-zero emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning methods increase the accuracy of flight profile-based fuel estimation and thus eliminate planning errors.
“Xiong et al.29 showed that machine learning methods increase the accuracy of flight profile-based fuel estimation and thus eliminate planning errors.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The Abstract reports improved fuel-consumption prediction accuracy across climb, cruise, and descent and says the estimates can help optimize flight profiles and fuel loading. It does not say planning errors are eliminated. The Conclusions also note factors that may affect accuracy and say the relationship between predictions and actual flight operations has not been established. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredXiong et al. state that modeling the weight-fuel relationship for different flight phases is crucial.
“Xiong et al.29 state that modeling the weight-fuel relationship for different flight phases is crucial.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as Xiong et al.29
Table 3 (listed under Conclusions; page unavailable) includes aircraft weight among the factors used for cruise and descent fuel-consumption prediction, and the Conclusions say the model captures weight-related impacts through mass-dependent parameters. The paper supports phase-specific fuel modeling, but does not explicitly say that modeling the weight–fuel relationship is crucial across flight phases; Table 3 does not list weight for climb. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredXiong et al. examine the impact of flight profile choices on fuel cost by examining the climb, dilution, and descent phases separately with fuel consumption models.
“Xiong et al.29 examine the impact of flight profile choices on fuel cost by examining the climb, dilution, and descent phases separately with fuel consumption models.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as Xiong et al.29
Section 4.2.1 and the prediction tables in Section 5 show that Xiong et al. model fuel consumption separately for climb, cruise, and descent. The cited paper does not identify a “dilution” phase; it also presents flight-profile optimization as a potential use of its predictions, rather than reporting a direct analysis of how profile choices affect fuel cost. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPilot behavior and flight management impact fuel consumption.
“Pilot behavior and flight management also impact fuel consumption.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
New technologies and data analysis techniques regarding fuel consumption that have emerged in recent years allow for more accurate examination and mitigation of the effects of these factors.
“New technologies and data analysis techniques regarding fuel consumption that have emerged in recent years allow for more accurate examination and mitigation of the effects of these factors29.”
From Introducing the comparative weighting evaluation based on the best criteria method: a multi-fuzzy framework for aviation fuel efficiency (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Khalili, S., Rantanen, E., Bogdanov, D., & Breyer, C. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12203870 · Cited by 290
A reliable predict-then-optimize approach for minimizing aircraft fuel consumption
Wang, Z., Xue, D., Wu, L., & Yan, R. (2025) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2025.104693 · Cited by 22
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Pagoni, 2017, Calculation of aircraft fuel consumption and CO2 emissions based on path profile estimation by clustering and registration, Transp. Res. Part D Transp., 54, 172, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.006 · DOI
- Baklacioglu, 2016, Modeling the fuel flow-rate of transport aircraft during flight phases using genetic algorithm-optimized neural networks, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 49, 52, 10.1016/j.ast.2015.11.031 · DOI
- Nikoleris, 2011, Detailed estimation of fuel consumption and emissions during aircraft taxi operations at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 16, 302, 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.007 · DOI
- Yanto, 2018, Aircraft fuel burn performance study: A data-enhanced modeling approach, Transp. Res., 65, 574
- Zhang, M., Huang, Q., Liu, S., and Zhang, Y. (2019). Fuel Consumption Model of the Climbing Phase of Departure Aircraft Based on Flight Data Analysis. Sustainability, 11. · DOI
- Nuic, 2022, BADA: An advanced aircraft performance model for present and future ATM systems, Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., 24, 850, 10.1002/acs.1176 · DOI · Paper page
- Khan, 2021, Prediction of aircraft trajectory and the associated fuel consumption using covariance bidirectional extreme learning machines, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 145, 102189, 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102189 · DOI
- Kaiser, M., Schultz, M., and Fricke, H. (2011, January 26–27). Enhanced jet performance model for high precision 4D flight path prediction. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control Systems, Barcelona, Spain.
- Dalmau, 2019, Fuel and time savings by flying continuous cruise climbs, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 35, 62, 10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.019 · DOI
- Burzlaff, M. (2017). Aircraft Fuel Consumption-Estimation and Visualization. [Ph.D. Thesis, Hamburg University of Applied Science].
- Yutko, B.M. (2021). Approaches to Representing Aircraft Fuel Efficiency Performance for the Purpose of a Commercial Aircraft Certification Standard. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
- Jensen, L., Hansman, R.J., Venuti, J.C., and Reynolds, T. (2013, January 12–14). Commercial airline speed optimization strategies for reduced cruise fuel consumption. Proceedings of the 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Los Angeles, CA, USA. · DOI
- Trani, 2024, A Neural Network Model to Estimate Aircraft Fuel Consumption, Aiaa J., 10, 61
- Wang, 2025, Developing an aircraft takeoff mass estimation model based on the hybrid KMI-DNN-BI model using quick access recorder (QAR) data, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 158, 109918, 10.1016/j.ast.2024.109918 · DOI
- Wang, 2022, Multivariate regression with PCA for aircraft fuel consumption prediction: A case study of QAR data analytics, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 108, 103315
- Smith, 2021, Bayesian hierarchical modeling of aircraft fuel burn integrating QAR data and performance benchmarks, Aerospace, 8, 256
- 2023, Generalized additive models for fuel consumption prediction: A QAR data-driven approach with flight phase segmentation, J. Air Transp. Manag., 107, 102335
- Zhang, 2021, Hybrid CNN-LSTM model for aircraft fuel burn prediction using high-frequency QAR data, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 132, 103405
- Liu, 2022, A transformer-based approach for aircraft fuel consumption prediction with attention to QAR data spatiotemporal features, Expert Syst. Appl., 207, 117952
- Chen, 2023, Graph neural networks for integrated fuel prediction: Combining QAR data, radar tracks, and weather impacts, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 59, 1450
- Liu, 2022, Data-driven fuel efficiency optimization in commercial aviation: A QAR-based anomaly detection framework, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 128, 107754
- Chen, 2023, Spatiotemporal feature fusion for fuel prediction: Integrating QAR data and air traffic control constraints, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 24, 2876
- Yadav, 2022, Fuel consumption prediction and trajectory optimization for climate-efficient aviation, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 109, 103335
- Zhang, 2023, A multi-objective deep learning framework for fuel prediction and emission budgeting in sustainable aviation, Appl. Energy, 334, 120678
- Zhang, 2023, An enhanced CEEMDAN method with adaptive noise amplitude selection for rotating machinery fault diagnosis, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 189, 110432, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110432 · DOI
- Wang, 2022, CEEMDAN-based hybrid deep learning model for ECG signal denoising and arrhythmia classification, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 71, 1, 10.1109/TIM.2022.3216413 · DOI
- Li, 2023, An adaptive particle swarm optimization with dynamic inertia weight and learning factors for high-dimensional optimization, Expert Syst. Appl., 213, 119213
- Chen, 2024, A dynamic multi-strategy particle swarm optimizer with adaptive parameters for engineering design optimization, Swarm Intell., 18, 45
- Gupta, 2022, A hybrid PSO algorithm with adaptive learning mechanism for complex optimization problems, Swarm Evol. Comput., 71, 101090
- Fu, 2014, Particle swarm optimization algorithm of learning factors and time factor adjusting to weights, Appl. Res. Comput., 31, 3291
- Narendra, 2021, Long short-term memory, Big Data Min. Anal., 4, 279
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eti, S., Karaman, F., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Yaylalı, İ. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32988-7 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, J., Zou, C., Wan, Y., Sun, Y., & Yu, G.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
- Shanghai Shentong Metro Group Co., Ltd., Technical Center, Shanghai 201103, China
- Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
- Shanghai University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Xiong, Jing
- Zou, Chunling
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-04-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3358
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409290553
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (2022-A04R-1-1, 72471133, 21ZR1423800)
- Chinese National Nature Science Foundation Project (2022-A04R-1-1, 72471133, 21ZR1423800)
- Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality (2022-A04R-1-1, 72471133, 21ZR1423800)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
- Keywords
- quick access recorder data, CEEMDAN, LSTM, flight phases, aircraft emissions reduction, sustainable aviation, aviation decarbonization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review