Cited by 129Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Innovations and PracticesInsect Resistance and Genetics

A Meta Analysis on Farm-Level Costs and Benefits of GM Crops

Open access
Finger, Robert, El Benni, Nadja, Kaphengst, Timo, Evans, Clive, Herbert, Sophie, Lehmann, Bernard, Morse, Stephen, Stupak, Nataliya·2011·Sustainability

Abstract

This paper reviews the evidence on the socio-economic impacts of GM crops and analyzes whether there are patterns across space and time. To this end, we investigate the effect of GM crops on farm-level costs and benefits using global data from more than one decade of field trials and surveys. More specifically, we analyze the effects of GM-crops on crop yields, seed costs, pesticide costs, and management and labor costs and finally gross margins. Based on collected data from studies on Bt cotton and Bt maize, statistical analyses are conducted to estimate the effect of GM crop adoption on these parameters. Our results show that, compared to conventional crops, GM crops can lead to yield increases and can lead to reductions in the costs of pesticide application, whereas seed costs are usually substantially higher. Thus, the results presented here do support the contention that the adoption of GM crops leads on average to a higher economic performance, which is also underlined by the high adoption rates for GM crops in a number of countries. However, the kind and magnitude of benefits from GM crops are very heterogeneous between countries and regions, particularly due to differences in pest pressure and pest management practices. Countries with poor pest management practices benefited most from a reduction in yield losses, whereas other countries benefited from cost reductions. However, our study also reveals limitations for meta-analyses on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops. In particular, published data are skewed towards some countries and the employed individual studies rely on different assumptions, purposes and methodologies (e.g., surveys and field trials). Furthermore, a summary of several (often) short-term individual studies may not necessarily capture long-term effects of GM crop adoption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su3050743

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gibson, J.W.; Laughlin, D.; Luttrell, R.G.; Parker, D.; Reed, J.; Harris, A. Comparisons of costs and returns associated with Heliothis resistant Bt cotton to non-resistant varieties. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 6-10 January 1997.
  2. Bryant, K.J.; Nichols, R.L.; Allen, C.T.; Benson, N.R.; Bourland, F.M.; Earnest, L.D.; Kharboutly, M.S.; Smith, K.L.; Webster, E.P. Economic and marketing: Transgenic cotton cultivars: An economic comparison in Arkansas. J. Cotton Sci. 2003, 7, 194-204.
  3. Degenhardt, H.; Horstmann, F.; Mulleder, N. Bt maize in Germany: Experience with cultivation from 1998 to 2002. Mais 2003, 2, 75-77.
  4. Brookes, G. The farm level impact of using Bt maize in Spain. Presented at The 6th International ICABR Conference, Ravello, Italy, 11-14 July 2002.
  5. Smale, M.; Zambrano, P.; Cartel, M. Bales and balance: A review of the methods used to assess the economic impact of Bt cotton on farmers in developing economics. AgBioForum 2006, 9, 195-212.
  6. Gómez-Barbero, M.; Rodrigues-Cerezo, E. Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: A Review; Technical Review Series; Joint Research Center, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finger, R., El Benni, N., Kaphengst, T., Evans, C., Herbert, S., Lehmann, B., Morse, S., & Stupak, N.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Agri-Food and Agri-Environmental Economics Group, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 33, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
  • Ecologic Institute (DE)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Finger, Robert
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
743-762
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115651452
Cited by
129
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
genetically modified crops, Bt cotton, Bt maize, crop yield, seed cost, pesticide costs, labor costs, gross margin, pest control strategies, GM crop adoption, socio-economic impacts, meta-analysis limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review