A Meta Analysis on Farm-Level Costs and Benefits of GM Crops
Open accessAbstract
This paper reviews the evidence on the socio-economic impacts of GM crops and analyzes whether there are patterns across space and time. To this end, we investigate the effect of GM crops on farm-level costs and benefits using global data from more than one decade of field trials and surveys. More specifically, we analyze the effects of GM-crops on crop yields, seed costs, pesticide costs, and management and labor costs and finally gross margins. Based on collected data from studies on Bt cotton and Bt maize, statistical analyses are conducted to estimate the effect of GM crop adoption on these parameters. Our results show that, compared to conventional crops, GM crops can lead to yield increases and can lead to reductions in the costs of pesticide application, whereas seed costs are usually substantially higher. Thus, the results presented here do support the contention that the adoption of GM crops leads on average to a higher economic performance, which is also underlined by the high adoption rates for GM crops in a number of countries. However, the kind and magnitude of benefits from GM crops are very heterogeneous between countries and regions, particularly due to differences in pest pressure and pest management practices. Countries with poor pest management practices benefited most from a reduction in yield losses, whereas other countries benefited from cost reductions. However, our study also reveals limitations for meta-analyses on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops. In particular, published data are skewed towards some countries and the employed individual studies rely on different assumptions, purposes and methodologies (e.g., surveys and field trials). Furthermore, a summary of several (often) short-term individual studies may not necessarily capture long-term effects of GM crop adoption.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory
Tabashnik, B. E., Gassmann, A. J., Crowder, D. W., & Carrière, Y. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1382 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries
Qaim, M., & Zilberman, D. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1080609 · Cited by 757 · see citing works
Green revolution: preparing for the 21st century
Khush, G. S. (1999) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g99-044 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Five years of Bt cotton in China – the benefits continue
Pray, C. E., Huang, J., Hu, R., & Rozelle, S. (2002) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01401.x · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Pray, C. E., Ma, D., Huang, J., & Qiao, F. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00010-9 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Enhancing the crops to feed the poor
Huang, J., Pray, C. E., & Rozelle, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01015 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects
Qaim, M., & Traxler, G. (2005) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00006.x · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops
Carpenter, J. E. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0410-319 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China
Huang, J., Hu, R., Pray, C. E., Qiao, F., & Rozelle, S. (2003) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00147.x · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Can GM-Technologies Help the Poor? The Impact of Bt Cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal
Thirtle, C. G., Beyers, L., Ismael, Y., & Piesse, J. (2003) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(03)00004-4 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Adoption of Bt Cotton and Impact Variability: Insights from India
Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., Naik, G., & Zilberman, D. (2005) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00272.x · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Azadi, H., & Ho, P. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.003 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Biotechnology boosts to crop productivity in China: trade and welfare implications
Huang, J., Hu, R., van Meijl, H., & van Tongeren, F. (2004) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.07.005 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Hafner, S. D. (2003) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(03)00019-7 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Evidence of slowing yield growth – The example of Swiss cereal yields
Finger, R. J. (2009) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.11.004 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationA GM subsistence crop in Africa: the case of Bt white maize in South Africa
Gouse, M., Pray, C. E., Kirsten, J. F., & Schimmelpfennig, D. (2005) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2005.006447 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Global impact of biotech crops: Environmental effects 1996-2009
Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2011) · GM Crops · doi:10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15529 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Coexistence Rules and Regulations in the European Union
Beckmann, V., Soregaroli, C., & Wesseler, J. (2006) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00932.x · Cited by 118 · see citing works
'Bt cotton' benefits, costs and impacts in China
Huang, J., Hu, R., Fan, C., Pray, C. E., & Rozelle, S. (2003) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Bt corn in Spain—the performance of the EU's first GM crop
Gómez‐Barbero, M., Berbel, J., & Rodríguez‐Cerezo, E. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0408-384 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Farm-Level Economic Performance of Genetically Modified Cotton in Maharashtra, India
Bennett, R. M., Kambhampati, U. S., Morse, S., & Ismael, Y. (2005) · Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00273.x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal crop production and the efficacy of crop protection - current situation and future trends
Oerke, E.-C., & Dehne, H. W. (1997) · European Journal of Plant Pathology · doi:10.1023/a:1008602111248 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Pesticide Productivity and Transgenic Cotton Technology: The South African Smallholder Case
Shankar, B., & Thirtle, C. G. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2005.tb00124.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Benefits from Bt cotton use by smallholder farmers in South Africa
Ismael, Y., Bennett, R. M., & Morse, S. (2002) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationProspects for Bt Cotton Technology in India
Barwale, R. B., Gadwal, V. R., Zehr, U. B., & Zehr, B. E. (2004) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Bennett, R. M., Morse, S., & Ismael, Y. (2006) · The Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220380600682215 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationRegulating coexistence in Europe: Beware of the domino-effect!
Demont, M., Daems, W., Dillen, K., Mathijs, E., Sausse, C., & Tollens, E. F. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.016 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Bt Cotton in India: Development of Benefits and the Role of Government Seed Price Interventions
Sadashivappa, P., & Qaim, M. (2009) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Global Impact of Biotech Crops: Income and Production Effects,
Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2009) · Agbioforum · Cited by 67 · see citing works
First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain
Demont, M., & Tollens, E. F. (2004) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00376.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Biotechnology's future benefits: prediction or promise?
Burkhardt, J. (2002) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Output and labour effects of GM maize and minimum tillage in a communal area of KwaZulu Natal
Gouse, M., Piesse, J., & Thirtle, C. G. (2006) · doi:10.35648/20.500.12413/11781/ii259 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The impact of using GM insect resistant maize in Europe since 1998
Brookes, G. (2008) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2008.018351 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Farm-Level Economic Impact of Biotechnology: Smallholder Bt Cotton Farmers in South Africa
Ismael, Y., Bennett, R. M., & Morse, S. (2002) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.5367/000000002101293949 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationSize and Distribution of Market Benefits from Adopting Biotech CropsPreprint
Price, G. K., Lin, W. W., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., & Fernandez‐Cornejo, J. (2005) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.758465 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Adoption and Impact of the First GM Crop Introduced in EU Agriculture: Bt Maize in Spain
Manuel, G. B., & Rodríguez‐Cerezo, E. (2008) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech
(2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0177-0 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Economic Comparison of Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton Production Systems in Georgia
Jost, P. H., Shurley, D., Culpepper, A. S., Roberts, P., Nichols, R. L., Reeves, J. M., & Anthony, S. (2008) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0259 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The Farm-Level Impact of Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in Romania
Brookes, G. (2005) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Commercialized GM crops and yield
Qaim, M., Subramanian, A., & Sadashivappa, P. (2009) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0909-803b · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Consmüller, N., Beckmann, V., & Schleyer, C. (2009) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Rejesus, R. M., Jk, G., Hammig, & Ce, C. (1997) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries: a note on the methods
Smale, M., Zambrano, P., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., Gruère, G., & Matuschke, I. (2008) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2008.022491 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Monopoly Power, Price Discrimination, and Access to Biotechnology Innovations
Acquaye, A. K. A., & Traxler, G. (2005) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Adoption Patterns of Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans in Argentina
Finger, R., Hartmann, M., & Feitknecht, M. (2009) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000159378 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationThe lack of clear GMO regulation: its impact on researchers and farmers in Brazil
Contini, E., Sampaio, M. J. A. M., & Ávila, A. F. D. (2005) · International Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbt.2005.006443 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Valuing Transgenic Cotton Technologies Using a Risk/Return Framework
Bryant, K. J., Reeves, J. M., Nichols, R. L., Greene, J. K., Tingle, C. H., Studebaker, G. E., Bourland, F. M., Capps, C. D., & Groves, F. E. (2008) · Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics · doi:10.1017/s1074070800002315 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The farm level impact of using GM agronomic traits in Polish arable crops
Anioł, A. (2005) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Adoption of Transgenic Crops by Smallholder Farmers in Entre Rios, ArgentinaPreprint
Paredes, C., & Martin, M. A. (2007) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.9996 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Stock price responses on the German suspension of genetically modified maize
Finger, R. (2010) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000159377 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Gibson, J.W.; Laughlin, D.; Luttrell, R.G.; Parker, D.; Reed, J.; Harris, A. Comparisons of costs and returns associated with Heliothis resistant Bt cotton to non-resistant varieties. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 6-10 January 1997.
- Bryant, K.J.; Nichols, R.L.; Allen, C.T.; Benson, N.R.; Bourland, F.M.; Earnest, L.D.; Kharboutly, M.S.; Smith, K.L.; Webster, E.P. Economic and marketing: Transgenic cotton cultivars: An economic comparison in Arkansas. J. Cotton Sci. 2003, 7, 194-204.
- Degenhardt, H.; Horstmann, F.; Mulleder, N. Bt maize in Germany: Experience with cultivation from 1998 to 2002. Mais 2003, 2, 75-77.
- Brookes, G. The farm level impact of using Bt maize in Spain. Presented at The 6th International ICABR Conference, Ravello, Italy, 11-14 July 2002.
- Smale, M.; Zambrano, P.; Cartel, M. Bales and balance: A review of the methods used to assess the economic impact of Bt cotton on farmers in developing economics. AgBioForum 2006, 9, 195-212.
- Gómez-Barbero, M.; Rodrigues-Cerezo, E. Economic Impact of Dominant GM Crops Worldwide: A Review; Technical Review Series; Joint Research Center, European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops
Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111629 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
“While earlier reviews of GM crop impacts exist [19–22], our approach adds to the knowledge in two important ways.”
BackgroundGenetically Engineered Crops: From Idea to Product
Prado, J. R., Segers, G. C., Voelker, T. A., Carson, D., Dobert, R. C., Phillips, J., Cook, K. A., Cornejo, C., Monken, J., Grapes, L., et al. (2014) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040039 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Pellegrino, E., Bedini, S., Nuti, M., & Ercoli, L. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21284-2 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Forster, D., Andrès, C., Verma, R., Zundel, C., Messmer, M., & Mader, P. M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081039 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Agricultural GMOs—What We Know and Where Scientists Disagree
Zilberman, D., Holland, T. G., & Trilnick, I. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10051514 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Pixley, K. V., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., Giller, K. E., Glenna, L., Gould, F. L., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Stelly, D. M., & Stewart, C. N. (2019) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045954 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Genetically modified crops, regulatory delays, and international trade
Smyth, S. J. (2017) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.100 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable?
Phélinas, P., & Choumert, J. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.033 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Social Impacts of GM Crops in Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review
Fischer, K., Ekener, E., Rydhmer, L., & Björnberg, K. E. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su7078598 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Gouse, M., Sengupta, D., Zambrano, P., & Zepeda, J. F. (2016) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.008 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The impact of agricultural biotechnology on supply and land-use
Barrows, G., Sexton, S., & Zilberman, D. (2014) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x14000400 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Caradus, J. R. (2022) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2022.2141273 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Global economic, environmental and health benefits from GM crop adoption
Smyth, S. J., Kerr, W. A., & Phillips, P. W. B. (2015) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.002 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mannion, A. M., & Morse, S. (2012) · Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133312457109 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationA World without Hunger: Organic or GM Crops?
Taheri, F., Azadi, H., & D’Haese, M. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9040580 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Global value of GM rice: a review of expected agronomic and consumer benefits
Demont, M., & Stein, A. J. (2013) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2013.04.004 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Are current EU policies on GMOs justified?
Christiansen, A. T., Andersen, M. M., & Kappel, K. (2019) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-019-00120-x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Riar, A. S., Mandloi, L. S., Poswal, R. S., Messmer, M., & Bhullar, G. S. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01289 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Brookes, G. R. (2019) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2019.1614393 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Ainembabazi, J. H., Tripathi, L., Rusike, J., Abdoulaye, T., & Manyong, V. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138998 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Measuring the contribution of Bt cotton adoption to India's cotton yields leapPreprint
Gruère, G., & Sun, Y. N. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Genetically Modified (GM) Crop Use 1996–2020: Impacts on Carbon Emissions
Brookes, G. R. (2022) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2022.2118495 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Brookes, G. R., & Dinh, T. X. (2020) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2020.1816800 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Pros and Cons of GMO Crop Farming
Acker, R. V., Rahman, M. M., & Cici, S. Z. H. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.217 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Impacts of improved agricultural technology adoption on welfare in Africa: A meta-analysis
Habtewold, T. M., & Heshmati, A. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17463 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy
Hicks, D. (2015) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Analysing the farm level economic impact of GM corn in the Philippines
Afidchao, M. M., Musters, C. J. M., Wossink, G. A. A., Balderama, O., & de Snoo, G. R. (2014) · NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2014.05.008 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
The Differential Effects of Knowledge on Perceptions of Genetically Modified Food Safety
Hasell, A., & Stroud, N. J. (2019) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edz020 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Jung, J.-W., Park, S.-Y., Oh, S., Jang, Y., Suh, S. J., Park, S. K., Ha, S., Park, S. K., & Kim, J. K. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10102421 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Genetically modified crops in developing countries: Savior or traitor?
Azadi, H., Taheri, F., Ghazali, S., Moghaddam, S. M., Siamian, N., Goli, I., Choobchian, S., Pour, M. G., Özgüven, A. I., Janečková, K., et al. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133296 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Freshwater Ecology of Kenyan Highlands and Lowlands
Nyingi, D. W., Gichuki, N. N., & Ogada, M. (2013) · Developments in earth surface processes · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59559-1.00016-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Farmers willingness to grow GM food and cash crops: empirical evidence from Pakistan
Ali, A., & Rahut, D. B. (2018) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2018.1544831 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lunenfeld, B. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Molecular Identification of Genetically Modified Crops for Biosafety and Legitimacy of Transgenes
Nazir, S., Iqbal, M. Z., & Sajid-ur-Rahman (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.81079 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Impacts of the Land Tenure System on Sustainable Land Use in Ethiopia
Azadi, H., Moghaddam, S. M., Mahmoudi, H., Burkart, S., Dadi, D., Teklemariam, D., Lodin, M., & Lebailly, P. (2016) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03897-879-4-11 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Costs of Regulatory Delays for Genetically Modified Crops
Smyth, S. J., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., & Ludlow, K. (2016) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.253074 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A Question of Integrity: Variants of Bt Cotton, Pesticides and Productivity in Pakistan
Ma, X., Smale, M., Spielman, D. J., Zambrano, P., Nazli, H., & Zaidi, F. (2016) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/1477-9552.12174 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Modern Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Ethics
Sandin, P., & Moula, P. (2015) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9567-6 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Díaz, O. H., Meza, J. L. A., Baltazar, B. M., Bojórquez, G. B., Espinoza, L. C., Madrid, J. L. C., Martínez, J. M. D. L. F., Pompa, H. A. D., Escobedo, J. A., Banda, A. E., et al. (2016) · Transgenic Research · doi:10.1007/s11248-016-9991-z · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Global Socio-Economic and Environmental Dimensions of GM Maize Cultivation
Popp, J., & Lakner, Z. (2013) · Food and Nutrition Sciences · doi:10.4236/fns.2013.46a002 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
McGale, E., Diezel, C., Schuman, M. C., & Baldwin, I. T. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15207 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Azadi, H., Taube, F., & Taheri, F. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1322553 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
ON-FARM TRADE-OFFS FOR OPTIMAL AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES IN MATO GROSSO, BRAZIL
Carauta, M., Libera, A. A. D., Hampf, A. C., Chen, R. F. F., da Silveira, J. M. F. J., & Berger, T. (2017) · Revista de Economia e Agronegócio · doi:10.25070/rea.v15i3.505 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Arthropod food webs associated with cotton: Does Bt cotton mediate community stress?
Luz, C. E. A., Zuim, V., Oliveira, A. A. S., dos Santos, P. D. J., Campos, K. L., Haro, M. M., Vivan, L. M., Bastos, C. S., & Guedes, R. N. C. (2021) · Journal of Applied Entomology · doi:10.1111/jen.12928 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Pearsons, K. A., Chase, C. A., Omondi, E. C., Zinati, G. M., Smith, A., & Rui, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.1004256 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Yield and economic performance of the use of GM cotton worldwide over time
Witjaksono, J., Wei, X., Mao, S., Gǒng, W., Li, Y., & Yuán, Y. (2014) · China Agricultural Economic Review · doi:10.1108/caer-02-2013-0028 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Wesseler, J. (2018) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.5204 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Socio-Ethical Aspect of Genetically Modified Organisms: A Critical Analysis
N., A., Singh, G., & Shackira, A. M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820780-2.00019-4 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The impact of GM crops on agriculture
Schulman, A. H. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817240-7.00012-7 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Estimating The Potential Economic Benefits Of Adopting Bt Cotton In Selected COMESA Countries
Mulwa, M., Karembu, M., & Wafula, D. (2010) · Agbioforum · Cited by 9 · see citing works
New Types of Land Ownership to Sustain Life on Land
Theesfeld, I., & Curtiss, J. (2016) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03897-879-4-12 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
What have been the farm -level economic impacts of the global cultivation of GM crops?
Hall, C., Knight, B., Ringrose, S., & Knox, O. (2013) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Forest Landscape Restoration and Sustainable Biomass Utilization in Central Asia
Thevs, N. (2016) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03897-879-4-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Location, location, location: Presenting evidence for genetically modified crops
Morse, S., Mannion, A. M., & Evans, C. (2011) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.015 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationGMOs and poverty: the relationship between improved seeds and rural transformations
Smale, M. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d études du développement · doi:10.1080/02255189.2016.1208607 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Genetic Improvement of Vegetables Using Transgenic Technology
Samal, K. C., & Rout, G. R. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-810439-2.00010-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Crétenet, M., & Gourlot, J. (2016) · Éditions Quæ eBooks · doi:10.35690/978-2-7592-2380-0 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
OPINION PIECE Counterproductive consequences of ‘anti-GMO’ activism
Tagliabue, G. (2018) · Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics · doi:10.3354/esep00185 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kerr, W. A. (2019) · Agrekon · doi:10.1080/03031853.2019.1605299 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Technological opportunity, regulatory uncertainty, and the economics of Bt Cotton in Pakistan:Preprint
Spielman, D. J., Nazli, H., Ma, X., Zambrano, P., & Zaidi, F. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 5 · see citing works
An overview on the impact of genetically engineered organisms on crop yield and safety
Yogi, L. N., Kathayat, A., Bhandari, S., Paudel, P., & Mishra, P. (2024) · Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science · doi:10.26832/24566632.2024.0901025 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Assessment of the Environmental and Health Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops
Agarwal, A. V., & Singh, R. P. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820780-2.00015-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Freeman, J. (2012) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/v19i1.21724 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Challa, S., Neelapu, N. R. R., Dutta, T., & Mishra, M. R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5337-0_34 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Williams, A., Stuart, J. S., & William, A. (2013) · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY · doi:10.5897/ajb2012.11918 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Morse, S. (2016) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/0030727016666237 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationRegulatory System Impacts on Global GM Crop Adoption Patterns
Gleim, S. W., Smyth, S. J., & Phillips, P. W. B. (2016) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.253071 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gouse, M. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9440-9_13 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Lim, H. S., Yoon, A.-M., Kim, I. R., Choi, W., Jung, Y. J., Lee, S.-H., & Lee, J. R. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13127185 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Biotechnology for Farmers Welfare and Poverty Reduction: Technologies, Impact and Policy Framework
Rao, N. C. (2017) · Agricultural Economics Research Review · doi:10.5958/0974-0279.2017.00038.6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sharma, T., Kathpalia, J., Kumari, V., & Tyagi, R. (2021) · Journal of Global Communication · doi:10.5958/0976-2442.2021.00007.0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dzanku, F. M., Zambrano, P., Wood‐Sichra, U., Falck‐Zepeda, J. B., Chambers, J. A., Hanson, H., & Boadu, P. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Potential market and welfare effects of a gene-edited technology on the U.S. soybean market
Lee, Y., Perrin, R. K., & Fulginiti, L. E. (2025) · The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review · doi:10.22434/ifamr.1098 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sainger, M., Sainger, P. A., Chaudhary, D., Jaiwal, R., Singh, R. P., Dhankher, O. P., & Jaiwal, P. K. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2662-8_11 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Nutzen und Risiken der Freisetzung gentechnisch Veränderter Pflanzen
59, N. F. (2012) · vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich eBooks · doi:10.3218/3484-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Can Justice Respect Needs and Nature? The Idea of a Nature-Respecting Sufficiency
Ziegler, R. (2016) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03897-879-4-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
GMOs: History, Economic Status, Risks, and Socio-Economic Regulatory Frameworks
Nawaz, M. A., Ali, M. A., Golokhvast, K. S., Tsatsakis, A. M., & Chung, G. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823903-2.00013-5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Management of Helicoverpa Species by Entomopathogenic Nematodes
Hussain, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2015) · Soil biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-14499-3_14 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Agricultural Biotechnology and Public Attitudes
Aerni, P. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802259-7.00014-2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Nuthalapati, C. S. R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9431-7_7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bequet, L. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106773 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yağcı, A. H. (2021) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/8420639.0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mitzschke (2018) · doi:10.26481/dis.20181220am · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Göncü, S., & Harmankaya, Y. (2023) · MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences · doi:10.15406/mojes.2023.08.00270 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bett, E., Nyairo, N., Ayieko, D. M. O., & Amolo, J. O. (2014) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Welfare Analysis of Lifting the GM Ban in Russia
Chetvertakov, S. (2016) · Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics · doi:10.7160/aol.2016.080204 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Viju, C., Smyth, S. J., & Kerr, W. A. (2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1574-871520170000017013 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Arslan, G., Şuţan, N. A., & Yanık, T. (2019) · Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences · doi:10.20474/japs-5.2.3
Emerging Biotechnologies in Agriculture for Efficient Farming and Global Food Production
Ranawat, B., Shah, F., Dubey, S., Singh, A., & Mishra, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-9001-3_14 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Perception of Food Crops Developed by Mutagenesis Among Various Stakeholders
Pradhan, S., & Parida, A. K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-2722-7_11 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Agricultural Innovation and Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa in Nigeria
Olumide, A. (2024) · Journal of Developing Country Studies · doi:10.47604/jdcs.2672 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hedoui, M. A., & Beghin, J. C. (2024) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12591 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chaturvedi, S., Srinivas, K. R., & Kumar, A. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-32-9511-7_1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Guida, A. (2021) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13712 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hountondji, P. S., Tovignan, S., Hountondji, R. L., KOKOYE, H. S. E., Adjiba, C. T. S., Bonou-zin, R. D. C., Koussahoue, S. A., & Jonas, F. (2021) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2021.v17n14p85 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Estimating the Effect of Bt Cotton on Input Expenditure and Yield: An Indian Perspective
Giridhar, B. J., Praveen, K. V., & Singh, A. (2022) · National Academy Science Letters · doi:10.1007/s40009-022-01102-0 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The role of genetic breeding in food security: A review
Sam, E. K., Odoom, D. A., & Mensah, C. (2022) · International Journal of Frontline Research in Life Science · doi:10.56355/ijfrls.2022.1.1.0001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hicks, D., & Millstein, R. L. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6167-4_545-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Dguidegue, Y. (2019) · doi:10.32469/10355/70067 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Trade in CRISPR/Gene-Edited Wheat: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis
Fosu, P. (2019) · NDSU Repository (North Dakota State University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Finger, R., El Benni, N., Kaphengst, T., Evans, C., Herbert, S., Lehmann, B., Morse, S., & Stupak, N.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Agri-Food and Agri-Environmental Economics Group, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 33, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland
- Ecologic Institute (DE)
- University of Reading (GB)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Finger, Robert
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 743-762
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115651452
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
- Keywords
- genetically modified crops, Bt cotton, Bt maize, crop yield, seed cost, pesticide costs, labor costs, gross margin, pest control strategies, GM crop adoption, socio-economic impacts, meta-analysis limitations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review