The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle
Open accessAbstract
The carbon footprint of beef cattle is presented for Canada, The United States, The European Union, Australia and Brazil. The values ranged between 8 and 22 kg CO2e per kg of live weight (LW) depending on the type of farming system, the location, the year, the type of management practices, the allocation, as well as the boundaries of the study. Substantial reductions have been observed for most of these countries in the last thirty years. For instance, in Canada the mean carbon footprint of beef cattle at the exit gate of the farm decreased from 18.2 kg CO2e per kg LW in 1981 to 9.5 kg CO2e per kg LW in 2006 mainly because of improved genetics, better diets, and more sustainable land management practices. Cattle production results in products other than meat, such as hides, offal and products for rendering plants; hence the environmental burden must be distributed between these useful products. In order to do this, the cattle carbon footprint needs to be reported in kg of CO2e per kg of product. For example, in Canada in 2006, on a mass basis, the carbon footprint of cattle by-products at the exit gate of the slaughterhouse was 12.9 kg CO2e per kg of product. Based on an economic allocation, the carbon footprints of meat (primal cuts), hide, offal and fat, bones and other products for rendering were 19.6, 12.3, 7 and 2 kg CO2e per kg of product, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Using life cycle analysis (LCA), several studies have concluded that grass-finished beef systems have greater GHG intensities than feedlot-finished (FL) beef systems.”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Desjardins et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, there remains substantial uncertainty about soil C change over time in managed grasslands”
From Impacts of soil carbon sequestration on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in Midwestern USA beef finishing systems (2018) · cites this paper as Desjardins et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis
Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Marquis, M. C., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., Miller, H. L., & Chen, Z. (2007) · Cited by 23,398
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.
Schiavon, S., & Zecchin, R. (2007) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 16,994
Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines
International Organization for Standardization. Geneva (2006) · doi:10.5555/iso14044:2006 · Cited by 889
Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation
Pandey, D., Agrawal, M., & Pandey, J. S. (2010) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y · Cited by 764
Pelletier, N., Pirog, R., & Rasmussen, R. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009 · Cited by 419
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Faucitano, L., Dadgar, S., Shand, P. J., González, L. A., & Crowe, T. G. (2012) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010 · Cited by 402
Beauchemin, K. A., Henry Janzen, H., Little, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & McGinn, S. M. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.008 · Cited by 397
Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France
Basset-Mens, C., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (2004) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.05.007 · Cited by 380
System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production
Cederberg, C., & Stadig, M. (2003) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978508 · Cited by 338
The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment
Rotz, C. A., Montes, F., & Chianese, D. S. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2162 · Cited by 336
Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU
Nguyen, T. L. T., Hermansen, J. E., & Mogensen, L. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.023 · Cited by 298
A farm-focused calculator for emissions from crop and livestock production
Hillier, J., Walter, C., Malin, D., García–Suárez, T., Canals, L. M. I., & Smith, P. (2011) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014 · Cited by 293
Rochette, P., Worth, D., Lemke, R., McConkey, B., Pennock, D., Wagner-Riddle, C., & Desjardins, R. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss07025 · Cited by 259
Self-citationInternational Dairy Federation
Urueña, R. (2010) · Brill | Nijhoff eBooks · doi:10.1163/ej.9789004163300.i-1081.591 · Cited by 257
Including Carbon Emissions from Deforestation in the Carbon Footprint of Brazilian Beef
Cederberg, C., Persson, U. M., Neovius, K., Molander, S., & Clift, R. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103240z · Cited by 243
Pelletier, N. L. (2008) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.007 · Cited by 234
Red Meat Production in Australia: Life Cycle Assessment and Comparison with Overseas Studies
Peters, G. M., Rowley, H. V., Wiedemann, S. G., Tucker, R. W., Short, M. D., & Schulz, M. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901131e · Cited by 232
Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from the average Irish milk production system
Casey, J. W., & Holden, N. M. (2004) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2004.09.006 · Cited by 232
Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland
Casey, J. W., & Holden, N. M. (2006) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.008 · Cited by 171
Impact of pasture type on methane production by lactating beef cows
McCaughey, W. P., Wittenberg, K. M., & Corrigan, D. S. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a98-107 · Cited by 169
Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry
Verge, X. P. C., Dyer, J. A., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. E. (2008) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2008.05.003 · Cited by 153
Self-citationMethane yields from Brahman cattle fed tropical grasses and legumes
Kennedy, P. M., & Charmley, E. (2012) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an11103 · Cited by 140
Potential Soil C Sequestration on U.S. Agricultural Soils
Sperow, M., Eve, M. D., & Paustian, K. H. (2003) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/a:1022888832630 · Cited by 140
Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry in 2001
Verge, X. P. C., Dyer, J. A., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. E. (2007) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2007.02.008 · Cited by 119
Self-citationVeysset, P., Lherm, M., & Bébin, D. (2009) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2009.08.005 · Cited by 117
Long-term trends in greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian poultry industry
Verge, X. P. C., Dyer, J. A., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. E. (2009) · The Journal of Applied Poultry Research · doi:10.3382/japr.2008-00091 · Cited by 93
Self-citationGreenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian pork industry
Verge, X. P. C., Dyer, J. A., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. E. (2008) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2008.05.022 · Cited by 85
Self-citationSoil carbon change factors for the Canadian agriculture national greenhouse gas inventory
VandenBygaart, A. J., McConkey, B. G., Angers, D. A., Smith, W., de Gooijer, H., Bentham, M. J., & Martin, T. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss07015 · Cited by 80
van Haarlem, R. P., Desjardins, R. L., Gao, Z., Flesch, T. K., & Li, X. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/cjas08034 · Cited by 78
Self-citationFeitz, A. J., Lundie, S., Dennien, G., Morain, M., & Jones, M. (2005) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2005.10.228 · Cited by 73
Estimates of the interannual variations of N2O emissions from agricultural soils in Canada
Smith, W., Grant, B. B., Desjardins, R. L., Lemke, R. L., & Li, C. (2004) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1023/b:fres.0000012230.40684.c2 · Cited by 69
Self-citationCapper, J. L. (2011) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.2527/af.2011-0009 · Cited by 64
The Protein-based GHG Emission Intensity for Livestock Products in Canada
Dyer, J. A., Verge, X. P. C., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. E. (2010) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1080/10440046.2010.493376 · Cited by 62
Self-citationComparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia
Ridoutt, B. G., Sanguansri, P., & Harper, G. S. (2011) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su3122443 · Cited by 62
Canals, L. M. I., Domènech, X., Rieradevall, J., Puig, R., & Fullana–i–Palmer, P. (2002) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978908 · Cited by 51
Sink Potential of Canadian Agricultural Soils
Boehm, M., Junkins, B., Desjardins, R. L., Kulshreshtha, S., & Lindwall, W. (2004) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1023/b:clim.0000038205.09327.51 · Cited by 44
Self-citationSpace allowance during commercial long distance transport of cattle in North America1
González, L. A., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S., Bryan, M., Silasi, R., & Brown, F. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4771 · Cited by 44
Verge, X. P. C., Dyer, J. A., Worth, D. E., Smith, W., Desjardins, R. L., & McConkey, B. G. (2012) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani2030437 · Cited by 37
Self-citationYields of by-products from different cattle types
Terry, C. A., Knapp, R. H., Edwards, J. W., Mies, W. L., Savell, J. W., & Cross, H. R. (1990) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1990.68124200x · Cited by 28
Long-term trends in the greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian dairy industry
Dyer, J. A., Verge, X. P. C., Desjardins, R. L., & Worth, D. E. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/cjss07042 · Cited by 20
Self-citationVerge, X. P. C., Worth, D. E., Desjardins, R. L., McConkey, B. G., & Dyer, J. A. (2011) · Food engineering series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1587-9_5 · Cited by 11
Self-citationFeeding the World, Challenges and Opportunities for the U.S. Beef Industry
Peck, C. (2009) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Johnson, D.E., Phetteplace, H.W., Seidl, A.F., Schneider, U.A., and McCarl, B.A. (2003, January 17-21). Management Variations for U.S. Beef Production Systems: Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Profitability. Proceedings of the 3rd International Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Conference, Beijing, China.
- (2009). Environmental/Ecological Impact of the Dairy Sector: Literature Review on Dairy Products for an Inventory of Key Issues. List of Environmental Initiatives and Influences on the Dairy Sector.
- Annual Survey of Manufacturers, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2010. Data gathered from American FactFinder. Available online:http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml/.
- Wu, 2011, Characterication of provincially inspected slaughterhouse wastewater in Ontario, Can. Biosyst. Eng., 53, 6.9
- Arcand, Y., and Boye, J. (2012). Green Technologies in Food Production and Processing, Springer Science and Business Media.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories
Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082 · Cited by 1,017
Stanley, P. L., Rowntree, J. E., Beede, D. K., DeLonge, M. S., & Hamm, M. W. (2018) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.02.003 · Cited by 266
“…(~336million ha of land in the United States; (Chambers et al., 2016)) and their importance to livelihoods (Asner et al., 2004; Briske et al., 2015; Desjardins et al., 2012), grassland C sinks might represent a significant GHG mitigation strategy that should be included in beef production models.”
BackgroundInfluentialBarbhuiya, S., & Das, B. B. (2023) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02326 · Cited by 263
Accounting for soil carbon changes in agricultural life cycle assessment (LCA): a review
Goglio, P., Smith, W. N., Grant, B. B., Desjardins, R. L., McConkey, B. G., Campbell, C. A., & Nemecek, T. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.040 · Cited by 198
Self-citationTomás, W. M., Roque, F. D. O., Morato, R. G., Medici, E. P., Chiaravalloti, R. M., Tortato, F. R., Penha, J. M. F., Izzo, T. J., Garcia, L. C., Lourival, R., et al. (2019) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/1940082919872634 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Desjardins, R., Worth, D., Vergé, X., Maxime, D., Dyer, J., & Cerkowniak, D.
- Affiliations
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- Private Consultant, Ottawa, ON, K2A 1G6, Canada
- CIRAIG (CA)
- Private Consultant, Cambridge, ON, N3H 3Z9, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Desjardins, Raymond
- ORCID
- Desjardins, Raymond
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-12-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3279-3301
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080468116
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- carbon footprint, beef cattle, greenhouse gas emissions, economic allocation, hides, offal, rendering, sustainable land management, beef production efficiency, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
