Cited by 298Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU

Nguyen, Thu Lan T., Hermansen, John E., Mogensen, Lisbeth·2010·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.023

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, T. L. T., Hermansen, J. E., & Mogensen, L.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Thu Lan T.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
756-766
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968798165
Cited by
298
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
17.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
beef production, environmental impact of livestock, dairy calves, suckler herds, global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, land use, non-renewable energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, grazing, life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review