The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots
Open accessAbstract
This paper suggests spatial multi-criteria model in order to assist decision makers in the selection of sites which are suitable for ammunition depots (AD). They represent military facilities which have more criteria that need to be matched than civil structures. The proposed model is based on combined use of Geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria techniques. The model application is presented in the case study of Carpathian region, the Eastern part of Serbia. The model deals with nine restrictions and six evaluation criteria. Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory—Analytic Network Process (DEMATEL-ANP) multi-criteria techniques are used to determine weight coefficients of evaluation criteria. Along with the above mentioned methods, this paper introduces a new technique for the multi-criteria decision making—MAIRCA (MultiAttributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis) method. The MAIRCA method is used for the ranking and selection of suitable locations. The results have shown that 45 km2 of the Carpathian region is very suitable for ammunition depot construction. The MAIRCA method chose location L1 as the most appropriate. Sensitivity analysis shows that the model is capable of identifying a suitable ammunition depot location. This approach can be helpful in determining suitable ammunition depot locations in other regions with similar geographic conditions and can also be successfully used for the suitability assessment of existing ammunition depots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process
Saaty, T. L. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,356
GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature
Malczewski, J. (2006) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658810600661508 · Cited by 2,289
TZENG, G., CHIANG, C., & LI, C. (2007) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004 · Cited by 1,266
Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method
Wu, W.-W., & Lee, Y.-T. (2007) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005 · Cited by 1,245
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationBüyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162 · Cited by 971
Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey
Farahani, R. Z., SteadieSeifi, M., & Asgari, N. (2010) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.005 · Cited by 661
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems
(2008) · Geographic Information Systems in Water Resources Engineering · doi:10.1201/9781420069143.ch2 · Cited by 627
Sánchez-Lozano, J. M., Teruel-Solano, J., Soto-Elvira, P. L., & García-Cascales, M. S. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019 · Cited by 613
RASTER PROCEDURES FOR MULTI-CRITERIA/MULTI-OBJECTIVE DECISIONS
Ronald, E. J., Wei-gen, J., & Ayuba, P. (1995) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · Cited by 558
Cited by
Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in Urban Areas
Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Drobnjak, S. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9060360 · Cited by 341
Self-citationAn integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA
Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2020) · Engineering Failure Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104195 · Cited by 215
Aleksić, A., Tadić, D., Komatina, N., & Nestić, S. (2025) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math13132216 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Milićević, M.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-04-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 372
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2342216150
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 14.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su8040372
- The paper
- Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Milićević, M. (2016). The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.