The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in Urban Areas
Open accessAbstract
Floods are natural disasters with significant socio-economic consequences. Urban areas with uncontrolled urban development, rapid population growth, an unregulated municipal system and an unplanned change of land use belong to the highly sensitive areas where floods cause devastating economic and social losses. The aim of this paper is to present a reliable GIS multi-criteria methodology for hazard zones’ mapping of flood-prone areas in urban areas. The proposed methodology is based on the combined application of geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). The methodology considers six factors that are relevant to the hazard of flooding in urban areas: the height, slope, distance to the sewage network, the distance from the water surface, the water table and land use. The expert evaluation takes into account the nature and severity of observed criteria, and it is tested using three scenarios: the modalities of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The first of them uses a new approach to the exploitation of uncertainty in the application of the AHP technique, the interval rough numbers (IR’AHP). The second one uses the fuzzy technique for the exploitation of uncertainty with the AHP method (F’AHP), and the third scenario contemplates the use of the traditional (crisp) AHP method. The proposed methodology is demonstrated in Palilula Municipality, Belgrade, Serbia. In the last few decades, Palilula Municipality has been repeatedly devastated by extreme flood events. These floods severely affected the transportation networks and other infrastructure. Historical flood inundation data have been used in the validation process. The final urban flood hazard map proves a satisfactory agreement between the flood hazard zones and the spatial distribution of historical floods that happened in the last 58 years. The results indicate that the scenario in which the IR’AHP methodology is used provides the highest level of compatibility with historical data on floods. The produced map showed that the areas of very high flood hazard are located on the left Danube River bank. These areas are characterized by lowland morphology, gentle slope, sewage network, expansion of impermeable locations and intense urbanization. The proposed GIS-IR’AHP methodology and the results of this study provide a good basis for developing a system of flood hazard management in urban areas and can be successfully used for spatial city development policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Pawlak, Z. (1982) · International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01001956 · Cited by 12,322
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
Saaty, T. L. (1977) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 · Cited by 10,360
Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L. (1979) · doi:10.21236/ada214804 · Cited by 4,466
GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature
Malczewski, J. (2006) · International Journal of Geographical Information Science · doi:10.1080/13658810600661508 · Cited by 2,289
Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6 · Cited by 2,210
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057 · Cited by 1,139
Self-citationPourghasemi, H. R., Pradhan, B., & Gokceoglu, C. (2012) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2 · Cited by 1,034
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2013) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034 · Cited by 843
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., Mansor, S., & Ahmad, N. (2015) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017 · Cited by 827
Cited by
Salazar-Briones, C., Ruiz-Gibert, J. M., Lomelí-Banda, M. A., & Mungaray-Moctezuma, A. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12020608 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Drobnjak, S.
- Venue
- Water
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 360
- ISSN
- 2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2620530835
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in Urban Areas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/w9060360
- The paper
- Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., & Drobnjak, S. (2017). Application of GIS-Interval Rough AHP Methodology for Flood Hazard Mapping in Urban Areas. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.