Cited by 40Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Agroecology and Ecological Intensification. A Discussion from a Metabolic Point of View

Open access
González de Molina, Manuel, Guzmán Casado, Gloria·2017·Sustainability

Abstract

This paper documents the origin and conceptual ambiguity of the terms Sustainable, Ecological and Agroecological Intensification. It defines the concept of Ecological Intensification from an agroecological perspective, and examines in energy terms whether it may be sustainable. To illustrate the theory, we apply Land Cost of Sustainable Agriculture (LACAS) methodology to Spanish agriculture, which is representative of Mediterranean agroclimatic conditions. As a result, we demonstrate the impossibility of generalizing an extensive Organic Farming (OF) scenario under the techniques currently used by organic farmers. This is due to the fact that it would bring about a reduction of 13% in agricultural production. Which necessarily means that OF has to be intensified under agroecological criteria. This option is also explored in two scenarios. As a result, we show that it is possible to compensate the yield gap between OF and conventional agriculture by implementing low-entropy internal loop strategies which reduce the land cost of generating the necessary nitrogen flows. However, these cannot exceed the limits established by the structure of Spanish territory. That is, agroecological intensification cannot be prolonged indefinitely over time since it is limited by the land available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su9010086

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
González de Molina, M., & Guzmán Casado, G.
Affiliations
Agroecosystems History Lab, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-01-10
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
86
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570997544
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (HAR2015)
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (HAR2015-69620-C2, 69620)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
agroecological intensification, ecological intensification, sustainable agriculture, organic farming, energy analysis, yield gap, nitrogen transport, agricultural land availability, Spanish agriculture, Mediterranean agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review