Agroecology and Ecological Intensification. A Discussion from a Metabolic Point of View
Open accessAbstract
This paper documents the origin and conceptual ambiguity of the terms Sustainable, Ecological and Agroecological Intensification. It defines the concept of Ecological Intensification from an agroecological perspective, and examines in energy terms whether it may be sustainable. To illustrate the theory, we apply Land Cost of Sustainable Agriculture (LACAS) methodology to Spanish agriculture, which is representative of Mediterranean agroclimatic conditions. As a result, we demonstrate the impossibility of generalizing an extensive Organic Farming (OF) scenario under the techniques currently used by organic farmers. This is due to the fact that it would bring about a reduction of 13% in agricultural production. Which necessarily means that OF has to be intensified under agroecological criteria. This option is also explored in two scenarios. As a result, we show that it is possible to compensate the yield gap between OF and conventional agriculture by implementing low-entropy internal loop strategies which reduce the land cost of generating the necessary nitrogen flows. However, these cannot exceed the limits established by the structure of Spanish territory. That is, agroecological intensification cannot be prolonged indefinitely over time since it is limited by the land available.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The vagueness with which agroecology and participatory approaches are often applied represents a serious risk that agroecological approaches be conventionalized.
“The vagueness with which both agroecology and participatory approaches are often applied represents a serious risk that agroecological approaches be conventionalized”
From Exploring the contradictions of scaling: action plans for agroecological transition in metropolitan environments (2020) · cites this paper as González de Molina and Gúzman 2017
Cites
Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap
Ponisio, L. C., M'Gonigle, L. K., Mace, K. C., Palomino, J., de Valpine, P., & Kremen, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.1396 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005
Rudel, T. K., Schneider, L., Uriarte, M., Turner, B. L., DeFries, R., Lawrence, D., Geoghegan, J., Hecht, S., Ickowitz, A., Lambin, E. F., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812540106 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
Agroecology: Principles for the Conversion and Redesign of Farming Systems
CI, N., & MA, A. (2016) · Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography · doi:10.4172/2157-7625.s5-010 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Garbach, K., Milder, J. C., DeClerck, F. A. J., Montenegro de Wit, M., Driscoll, L., & Gemmill-Herren, B. (2017) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2016.1174810 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe
van der Ploeg, J. D., Barjolle, D., Bruil, J., Brunori, G., Costa Madureira, L. M., Dessein, J., Drąg, Z., Fink-Kessler, A., Gasselin, P., Gonzalez de Molina, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.09.003 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Padró, R., Tello, E., Marco, I., Olarieta, J. R., Grasa, M. M., & Font, C. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124043 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
López-García, D., García-García, V., Sampedro-Ortega, Y., Pomar-León, A., Tendero-Acin, G., Sastre-Morató, A., & Correro-Humanes, A. (2020) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1649783 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- González de Molina, M., & Guzmán Casado, G.
- Affiliations
- Agroecosystems History Lab, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Seville, Spain
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-01-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2570997544
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (HAR2015)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (HAR2015-69620-C2, 69620)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- agroecological intensification, ecological intensification, sustainable agriculture, organic farming, energy analysis, yield gap, nitrogen transport, agricultural land availability, Spanish agriculture, Mediterranean agriculture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review