Cited by 216Plant and soil sciencesAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Agroecology: Principles for the Conversion and Redesign of Farming Systems

Open access
CI, Nicholls, MA, Altieri·2016·Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography

Abstract

Modern agroecosystems require systemic change, but new redesigned farming systems will not emerge from simply implementing a set of practices (rotations, composting, cover cropping, etc.) but rather from the application of already well defined agroecological principles. These principles can be applied using various practices and strategies, each having different effects on productivity, stability and resiliency of the target farming system. By breaking the monoculture nature of farming systems, agroecological diversification aims at mimicking ecological processes leading to optimal nutrient cycling and organic matter turnover, soil biological activation, closed energy flows, water and soil conservation and balanced pest-natural enemy populations. All these processes are key maintaining the agroecosystem’s health, productivity and its self-sustaining capacity. By enhancing functional biodiversity, a major goal of the conversion process is achieved: strengthening the weak ecological functions in the agroecosystem, allowing farmers to gradually eliminate inputs altogether by relying instead on ecological processes and interactions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4172/2157-7625.s5-010

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Productive strategies (use of living fences, covers, crop association, agroforestry, and composting, among others) are not enough to enrich biodiversity within productive systems.

    “However, productive strategies (use of living fences, covers, crop association, agroforestry, and composting, among others) are not enough to enrich biodiversity within productive systems (Nicholls etal., 2016) since farms”

    From Agroecological planning of productive systems with functional connectivity to the ecological landscape matrix: two Colombian case studies (2024) · cites this paper as Nicholls et al., 2016

    The Conclusions say that intercropping, agroforestry and cover crops diversify agroecosystems and make their communities more complex. The Introduction says implementing a set of practices alone is insufficient for systemic redesign, not that those practices are insufficient to enrich biodiversity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Agroecology proposes the application of transitional principles towards sustainability based on biodiversity management for the transformation of productive systems.

    “Agroecology proposes the application of transitional principles towards sustainability based on biodiversity management for the transformation of productive systems (Nicholls etal., 2016).”
  • Establishing ecological infrastructure on the farm tends to be costly in the first 3-5 years during the redesign phase, but after key ecological services and processes are in motion, the need for external inputs is reduced and maintenance costs also decrease.

    “establishing ecological infrastructure on the farm (e.g. living fences, hedges, grass strips, insect habitats) tends to be costly in the first 3-5 years during the redesign phase, but after the key ecological services and processes are in motion, the need for external inputs is reduced due to the increase of functional biodiversity in the farm and maintenance costs also decrease (Nicholls and Alt”

    From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Nicholls and Altieri 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gliessman SR (1998) Agroecology: Ecological process in sustainable agriculture. Ann Arbor Press, Michigan, pp: 356.
  2. Altieri MA (2002) Agroecological principles and strategies for sustainable agri-culture. In: Uphoff NT (ed.), Agroecological innovations: Increasing food production with participatory development. Earthscan publication Ltd., London, pp: 40-46.
  3. Gliessman SR (2010) Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. (2nd ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, Newyork.
  4. Stone A, Scheuerell S, Darby H, Magdoff F, Ray R (2004) Suppression of soilborne diseases in field agricultural systems: organic matter management, cover cropping, and other cultural practices. In: Magdoff F, Weil RR (eds.)Soil organic matter in sustainable agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp: 131-177.
  5. Power AG, Flecker AS (1996) The role of biodiversity in tropical managed ecosystems. In: Orians GH, Dirzo R, Cushman JH (eds.) Biodiversity and Ecosystem Processes in Tropical Forests. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp: 73-194.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CI, N., & MA, A.
Venue
Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography
Published
2016
Volume
01
Issue
s5
ISSN
2157-7625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2418837294
Cited by
216
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
36.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
agroecology, agroecological principles, agroecological diversification, monoculture, nutrient cycling, soil organic matter, soil biological activity, functional biodiversity, agroecosystem resilience, agroecosystem productivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review