Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model

Open access
Hu, Zhongqing, Ding, Shuai, Li, Shizheng, Chen, Luting, Yang, Shanlin·2019·Symmetry

Abstract

Along with the development of Fintech, many scholars have studied how information technology is applied to financial services with a focus on extended methods for application. Few scholars have studied the influence mechanism behind the adoption of Fintech services. This paper proposes an improved technology acceptance model (TAM) that incorporates user innovativeness, government support, brand image, and perceived risk as determinants of trust to investigate how users adopt Fintech services. We designed a questionnaire, sent it to active customers of the Hefei Science and Technology Rural Commercial Bank, and obtained 387 eligible responses. We analyzed the data with a structural equation model (SEM) to test the hypotheses, including the relationships of all latent variables. The results reveal that users’ trust in Fintech services has a very significant influence on users’ attitudes for adoption. In addition, perceived ease of use and perceived risk does not affect users’ attitudes toward the adoption regarding Fintech services. This study contributes to the literature of the adoption of Fintech services by providing a more comprehensive view of the determinants of users’ attitudes by combining trust of Fintech services with TAM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/sym11030340

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Yin, H., and Gai, K. (2015, January 24–26). An Empirical Study on Preprocessing High-Dimensional Class-Imbalanced Data for Classification. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on High PERFORMANCE Computing and Communications, New York, NY, USA.
  2. Mishra, 2018, Financial Management and Forecasting Using Business Intelligence and Big Data Analytic Tools, Int. J. Financ. Eng., 6, 10
  3. Chang, Y., Wong, S.F., Lee, H., and Jeong, S.P. (2016, January 17–19). What Motivates Chinese Consumers to Adopt Fintech Services: A Regulatory Focus Theory. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Commerce: E-Commerce in Smart Connected World, Suwon, Korea. · DOI
  4. Saleem, 2014, Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Mobile Banking Adoption in Pakistan, Int. J. Trade Econ. Financ., 2, 537
  5. Adeiza, 2017, An Empirical Examination of the Major Relationship Factors Affecting Franchisees’ Overall Satisfaction and Intention to Stay, Iran. J. Manag. Stud., 10, 21
  6. Chin, 1998, Commentary: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, Mis Q., 22, 7

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S.
Venue
Symmetry
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-03-07
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
340
ISSN
2073-8994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2920759707
Cited by
573
References
78
FWCI
59.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71571058, 71690235 and 71472001)
  • Anhui Provincial Science and Technology Major Project (No. 16030801121 and 17030801001)
  • Key Project of Humanities and Social Sciences in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province (No. SK2017A0443)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/sym11030340
The paper
Hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11030340

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.