The DOI matches its Crossref record; 341 of the 341 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications
Open accessAbstract
Approximately two decades after the first pioneering analyses, the study of shape asymmetry with the methods of geometric morphometrics has matured and is a burgeoning field. New technology for data collection and new methods and software for analysis are widely available and have led to numerous applications in plants and animals, including humans. This review summarizes the concepts and morphometric methods for studying asymmetry of shape and size. After a summary of mathematical and biological concepts of symmetry and asymmetry, a section follows that explains the methods of geometric morphometrics and how they can be used to analyze asymmetry of biological structures. Geometric morphometric analyses not only tell how much asymmetry there is, but also provide information about the patterns of covariation in the structure under study. Such patterns of covariation in fluctuating asymmetry can provide valuable insight about the developmental basis of morphological integration, and have become important tools for evolutionary developmental biology. The genetic basis of fluctuating asymmetry has been studied from empirical and theoretical viewpoints, but serious challenges remain in this area. There are many promising areas for further research that are only little explored at present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology
Bookstein, F. L. (1992) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511573064 · Cited by 4,365
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
Manly, B. F. J. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315273075 · Cited by 4,194
Generalized procrustes analysis
Gower, J. C. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291478 · Cited by 3,267
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648
Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences
Raj, A., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050 · Cited by 2,593
Procrustes Methods in the Statistical Analysis of Shape
Goodall, C. (1991) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01825.x · Cited by 2,047
James Rohlf, F., & Marcus, L. F. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90024-j · Cited by 2,019
PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY
Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x · Cited by 1,914
Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour
Kuhl, F. P., & Giardina, C. R. (1982) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0146-664x(82)90034-x · Cited by 1,839
Cited by
Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R
Schlager, S. (2017) · Statistical Shape and Deformation Analysis · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-810493-4.00011-0 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Klingenberg, C.
- Venue
- Symmetry
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-06-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 843-934
- ISSN
- 2073-8994 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1494067796
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 341
- FWCI
- 60.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/sym7020843
- The paper
- Klingenberg, C. (2015). Analyzing Fluctuating Asymmetry with Geometric Morphometrics: Concepts, Methods, and Applications. Symmetry. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym7020843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.