Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,914

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY

Wagner, Günter P., Altenberg, Lee·1996·Evolution
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The problem of complex adaptations is studied in two largely disconnected research traditions: evolutionary biology and evolutionary computer science. This paper summarizes the results from both areas and compares their implications. In evolutionary computer science it was found that the Darwinian process of mutation, recombination and selection is not universally effective in improving complex systems like computer programs or chip designs. For adaptation to occur, these systems must possess "evolvability," i.e., the ability of random variations to sometimes produce improvement. It was found that evolvability critically depends on the way genetic variation maps onto phenotypic variation, an issue known as the representation problem. The genotype-phenotype map determines the variability of characters, which is the propensity to vary. Variability needs to be distinguished from variations, which are the actually realized differences between individuals. The genotype-phenotype map is the common theme underlying such varied biological phenomena as genetic canalization, developmental constraints, biological versatility, developmental dissociability, and morphological integration. For evolutionary biology the representation problem has important implications: how is it that extant species acquired a genotype-phenotype map which allows improvement by mutation and selection? Is the genotype-phenotype map able to change in evolution? What are the selective forces, if any, that shape the genotype-phenotype map? We propose that the genotype-phenotype map can evolve by two main routes: epistatic mutations, or the creation of new genes. A common result for organismic design is modularity. By modularity we mean a genotype-phenotype map in which there are few pleiotropic effects among characters serving different functions, with pleiotropic effects falling mainly among characters that are part of a single functional complex. Such a design is expected to improve evolvability by limiting the interference between the adaptation of different functions. Several population genetic models are reviewed that are intended to explain the evolutionary origin of a modular design. While our current knowledge is insufficient to assess the plausibility of these models, they form the beginning of a framework for understanding the evolution of the genotype-phenotype map.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. Akam, 1988, Homeotic genes and the control of segment diversity, Development, 104, 123, 10.1242/dev.104.Supplement.123 · DOI
  2. Alberch, 1983, Morphological variation in the neotropical salamander genus Bolitoglossa, Evolution, 37, 906, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05620.x · DOI
  3. Altenberg, 1985, Knowledge representation in the genome: new genes, exons, and pleiotropy, Genetics, 110, s41
  4. Altenberg, 1994, The evolution of evolvability in genetic programming, 47
  5. Altenberg, 1995a, The Schema theorem and the Price's theorem, 23
  6. Altenberg, 1995b, Genome growth and the evolution of the genotype-phenotype map, 205, 10.1007/3-540-59046-3_11 · DOI
  7. Altenberg, 1987, Selection, generalized transmission, and the evolution of modifier genes. I. The reduction principle, Genetics, 117, 559, 10.1093/genetics/117.3.559 · DOI
  8. Banzhaf, 1994, Genotype-phenotype mapping and neutral variation-A case study in genetic programming, 322, 10.1007/3-540-58484-6_276 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bonner, 1988, The evolution of complexity
  10. Bossert, 1967, Mathematical optimization: Are there abstract limits on natural selection?, 35
  11. Bremermann, 1966, Global properties of evolution processes, 3
  12. Bulmer, 1980, The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics
  13. Bürger, 1994, On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance, Genetics, 138, 901, 10.1093/genetics/138.3.901 · DOI
  14. Bürger, 1989, How much heritable variation can be maintained in finite populations by mutation-selection balance?, Evolution, 43, 1748, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02624.x · DOI
  15. Buss, 1987, The evolution of individuality
  16. Cheverud, 1995, Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components, Genetics, 130, 1455, 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1455 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Clayton, 1955, Mutation and quantitative variation, Am. Nat., 89, 151, 10.1086/281874 · DOI
  18. Davidor, 1991, Epistasis variance: A viewpoint on GA-hardness, 1, 23
  19. Eden, 1967, Inadequacies of neo-darwinian evolution as a scientific theory, 5
  20. Endler, 1986, Natural selection in the wild
  21. Eshel, 1973, Clone-selection and optimal rates of mutation, J. App. Prob., 10, 728, 10.1017/S0021900200095930 · doi:10.1017/s0021900200095930
  22. Falconer, 1981, Introduction to quantitative genetics
  23. Fogel, 1966, Artificial intelligence through simulated evolution
  24. Fontana, 1994, The arrival of the fittest, Bull. Math. Biol., 56, 1
  25. Forrest, 1993, Towards a stronger building-block hypothesis: Effects of relative building-block fitness on GA performance, 109
  26. Foster, 1992, Mechanisms of directed mutation, Genetics, 131, 783, 10.1093/genetics/131.4.783 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Frazzetta, 1975, Complex adaptations in evolving populations
  28. Friedberg, 1959, A learning machine, IBM J. Res. Dev., Part II, 3, 183
  29. Gimelfarb, 1989, Genotypic variation for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutation: Epistasis, Genetics, 123, 217, 10.1093/genetics/123.1.217 · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.1.217
  30. Goldberg, 1989, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning
  31. Goodman, 1955, Fact, fiction, forecast
  32. Gould, 1977, Ontogeny and phylogeny
  33. Halder, 1995, Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila, Science, 267, 1788, 10.1126/science.7892602 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Holland, 1992, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, 10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Jones, 1995, Evolutionary algorithms, fitness landscapes and search
  36. Jones , T. S. Forrest 1995 Fitness distance correlation as a measure of problem difficulty for genetic algorithms 184 192 in L. J. Eshelman Proceedings of the sixth international conference on genetic algorithms
  37. Kauffman, 1989, Adaptation on rugged fintess landscapes, 1, 527
  38. Kimura, 1965, A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 54, 731, 10.1073/pnas.54.3.731 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Kingman, 1978, A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation, J. App. Prob., 15, 1, 10.1017/S0021900200105534 · doi:10.1017/s0021900200105534 · Paper page
  40. Koza, 1992, Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection
  41. Lazebnyi, 1991, Fitness of experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster under directional and stabilizing selection, Genetika, 27, 1726
  42. Lande, 1975, The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutation, Genetics, 94, 203, 10.1093/genetics/94.1.203 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Lehmann, 1988, Aspects of the problem of knowledge representation, Siemens Forsch. Entwicklungsber., 17, 45
  44. Lerner, 1968, Heredity, Evolution, and Society
  45. Levinton, 1988, Genetics, paleontology and macroevolution
  46. MacKay, 1992, Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: Stimates from divergence among inbred strains, Evolution, 46, 300, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02039.x · DOI
  47. Maynard Smith, 1985, Developmental constraints and evolution, Quart. Rev. Biol., 60, 265, 10.1086/414425 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Mühlenbein, 1995, Analysis of selection, mutation and recombination in genetic algorithms, 142
  49. Müller, 1991, Novelty in evolution: Restructuring the concept, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 22, 229, 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001305 · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001305 · Paper page
  50. Needham, 1933, On the dissociability of the fundamental processes in ontogenesis, Biol. Rev., 8, 180, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1933.tb01153.x · DOI
  51. Price, 1970, Selection and covariance, Nature, 227, 520, 10.1038/227520a0 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Raff , R. A. The shape of life Univ. of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
  53. Raff, 1983, Embryos, genes, and evolution
  54. Ray, 1992, An approach to the synthesis of life, 371
  55. Rechenberg, 1973, Evolutionsstrategie
  56. Rechenberg, 1994, Evolutionsstrategie '94
  57. Rendel, 1967, Canalization and gene control
  58. Rich, 1991, Artificial intelligence
  59. Riedl, 1975, Die Ordnung des Lebendigen
  60. Rienesl, 1992, Constancy and change of basipodial variation patterns: A comparative study of crested and marbled newts-Triturus cristatus, Triturus marmoratus-and their natural hybrids, J. Evol. Biol., 5, 307, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5020307.x · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1992.5020307.x
  61. Scharloo, 1987, Constraints in selection response, 125, 10.1007/978-3-642-72770-2_8 · DOI
  62. Scharloo, 1988, Selection on morphological patterns, 230, 10.1007/978-3-642-73069-6_25 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73069-6_25
  63. Scharloo, 1991, Canalization: Genetic and developmental aspects, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 22, 65, 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.000433 · DOI
  64. Schmalhausen, 1949, Factors of evolution
  65. Schwefel, 1981, Numerical optimization of computer models
  66. Schwenk, 1995, A utilitarian approach to evolutionary constraint, Zoology, 98, 251
  67. Simon, 1965, The architecture of complexity, Gen. Syst., 10, 63
  68. Stadler, 1992, Correlation in landscapes of combinatorial optimization problems, Europhys. Lett., 20, 479, 10.1209/0295-5075/20/6/001 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/20/6/001
  69. Stearns, 1993, The evolutionary links between fixed and variable traits, Acta Paleontol. Pol., 38, 1
  70. Stearns, 1994, Fitness sensitivity and the canalization of life history traits, Evolution, 48, 1438, 10.2307/2410238 · DOI
  71. Stebbins, 1974, Flowering plants, 10.4159/harvard.9780674864856 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Turelli, 1988, Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances, and the maintenance of additive variance, Evolution, 42, 1342, 10.2307/2409017 · DOI
  73. Vermeij, 1970, Adaptive versatility and skeleton construction, Am. Nat., 104, 253, 10.1086/282659 · doi:10.1086/282659
  74. Vermeij, 1971, Gastropod evolution and morphological diversity in relation to shell geometry, J. Zool., 163, 15, 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1971.tb04522.x · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1971.tb04522.x
  75. Vermeij, 1973, Biological versatility and earth history, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 70, 1936, 10.1073/pnas.70.7.1936 · DOI
  76. Vermeij, 1974, Adaptation, versatility and evolution, Syst. Zool., 22, 466, 10.2307/2412953 · DOI
  77. Waddington, 1957, The strategy of the genes
  78. Wagner, 1994, Epistasis can facilitate the evolution of reproductive isolation by peak shifts: A two-locus two-allele model, Genetics, 138, 533, 10.1093/genetics/138.2.533 · DOI
  79. Wagner, 1981, Feedback selection and the evolution of modifiers, Acta Biotheor., 30, 79, 10.1007/BF00047674 · DOI
  80. Wagner, 1989a, Multivariate mutation-selection balance with constrained pleiotropic effects, Genetics, 122, 223, 10.1093/genetics/122.1.223 · DOI
  81. Wagner, 1989b, The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology, Evolution, 43, 1157, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02566.x · DOI · Paper page
  82. Wagner, 1989c, The biological homology concept, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20, 51, 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000411 · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.000411 · Paper page
  83. Wagner, 1995, The biological role of homologues: A building block hypothesis, Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh., 19, 279, 10.1127/njgpa/195/1995/279 · DOI
  84. Wagner, 1996, Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity, Am. Zool., 36, 36, 10.1093/icb/36.1.36 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Wagner, 1985, On the evolution of dominance modifiers II: A non-epuilibrium approach to the evolution of genetic systems, J. Theoret. Biol., 113, 475, 10.1016/S0022-5193(85)80034-5 · DOI
  86. Weinberger, 1991, Local Properties of Kauffman's N-k model, a tuneably rugged energy landscape, Physic. Rev. A, 44, 6399, 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.6399 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Weiss, 1990, Duplication with variation: Metameric logic in evolution from genes to morphology, Yearb. Phys. Anthropol., 33, 1, 10.1002/ajpa.1330330503 · DOI
  88. Winston, 1992, Artificial Intelligence
  89. Wright, 1964, Stochastic processes in evolution, 199
  90. Wright, 1968, Evolution and the genetic of populations, 1

Cited by

See all 1,914

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L.
Venue
Evolution
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1996-06
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
967-976
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x
OpenAlex
W2022730625
Cited by
1,914
References
2
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x
The paper
Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02339.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.