Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 64 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Differential Uptake and Translocation of Cadmium and Lead by Quinoa: A Multivariate Comparison of Physiological and Oxidative Stress Responses

Open access

Abstract

Contamination of soils with cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) has emerged as a serious environmental issue that reduces crop productivity. However, the metals tolerance and accumulation potential of quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd) under the combined stress of Cd and Pb has not yet been explored. In the present hydroponic study, the physiological and biochemical characteristics of quinoa exposed to Cd and Pb were explored. Four-week-old plants of quinoa genotype ‘Puno’ were grown under different concentrations of Cd (0, 50 and 100 µM), Pb (0, 250 and 500 µM) alone as well as in combinations. The results showed that with increasing Cd and Pb levels in the nutrient solution, the plant biomass, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll contents were decreased. However, the concurrent application of higher concentrations of Cd (100 µM) and Pb (500 µM) caused even more reduction in the plant biomass (more than 50% than the control) and physiological attributes. The combined application of Pb and Cd caused oxidative stress through an overproduction of H2O2 (10-fold) and TBARS (12.5-fold), leading to decrease in membrane stability (52%). The oxidative stress was alleviated by a 7-fold, 10-fold and 9-fold overactivation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), respectively. An excessive uptake of Cd resulted in a limited uptake of Pb and K in the roots and shoots of quinoa plants. The Cd and Pb tolerance and uptake potential of Puno showed its ability to stabilize Cd and Pb in co-contaminated soils.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This hydroponic study exposed quinoa genotype ‘Puno’ to Cd and Pb alone and in combination and found that combined Cd/Pb caused the greatest reductions in growth and physiology, along with oxidative stress and overactivation of antioxidant enzymes. Quinoa accumulated both metals more in roots than shoots (TF < 1) and showed potential to stabilize Cd and Pb in co-contaminated soils.

Key findings

  • Combined high Cd (100 µM) + Pb (500 µM) reduced shoot and root lengths by 60% and 61%, and shoot and root dry weights by 65% and 62%, respectively, versus control; single-metal treatments caused smaller reductions (e.g., shoot dry weight decreased 38% at 100 µM Cd and 24% at 500 µM Pb).
  • Pigment and stomatal responses declined most under combined metals: Chl a, Chl b, and total Chl fell by 55%, 60%, and 57%, and stomatal conductance by 47%, compared with declines at 100 µM Cd (31%, 32%, 31%; 20%) and 500 µM Pb (14%, 18%, 16%; 14%).
  • Combined Cd/Pb caused a 10-fold increase in H2O2 and a 12.5-fold increase in TBARS, with MSI declining by 55% in Results (the abstract reports 52%); antioxidant enzyme activities increased 7-fold (SOD), 9-fold (CAT), and 10-fold (POD) under the combination.
  • Cd and Pb bioconcentration factors were >1 for roots and shoots across treatments, but translocation factors were <1 for both metals; when Cd was combined with Pb, root and shoot Cd contents increased further while root and shoot Pb contents declined. Tolerance index values were 62% under 100 µM Cd, 76% under 500 µM Pb, and 38% under their combination.

Methods

  • Hydroponic experiment with quinoa genotype ‘Puno’: 30-day-old seedlings transplanted into half-strength Hoagland’s solution, acclimatized one week, then exposed for 28 days to Cd (0, 50, 100 µM) and Pb (0, 250, 500 µM) alone and in combination; completely randomized design with 9 treatments, 4 replications, and 2 plants per replication.
  • Measured growth, pigment contents, stomatal conductance, oxidative stress markers (H2O2, TBARS, MSI), antioxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, CAT), K, Cd, and Pb; Cd/Pb analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry and K by flame photometer; BCF, TF, and TI calculated.
  • Data analyzed by ANOVA at 5% significance with LSD pairwise comparison, plus PCA and Pearson correlations using XLSTAT 2014.

Limitations

  • The paper states that further research is needed to determine metal accumulation in quinoa grains and the expected health risks of growing quinoa in Cd- and Pb-co-contaminated soils.
  • The text notes that BCF is usually lower in soil culture than in hydroponics due to lower metal availability and mobility, indicating that these hydroponic results may not directly translate to field/soil conditions (evident from the discussion).
  • Only the genotype ‘Puno’ was tested, so genotypic variation in Cd/Pb tolerance and accumulation is not addressed (evident from the methods; not stated as a limitation by the authors).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/toxics10020068

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Effects of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on H2O2 contents (A), TBARS contents (B) and MSI (C) of quinoa. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.
Figure 1 Effects of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on H2O2 contents (A), TBARS contents (B) and MSI (C) of quinoa. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Effect of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on the activities of SOD (A), CAT (B) and POD (C) of quinoa. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.
Figure 2 Effect of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on the activities of SOD (A), CAT (B) and POD (C) of quinoa. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Effect of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on shoot (A) and root (B) K concentrations. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.
Figure 3 Effect of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on shoot (A) and root (B) K concentrations. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Effect of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on Cd concentration in shoot (A), root (B) and Pb concentration in shoot (C) and root (D) of quinoa. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.
Figure 4 Effect of different levels of Cd, Pb and their combinations on Cd concentration in shoot (A), root (B) and Pb concentration in shoot (C) and root (D) of quinoa. Different letters represent the significant difference among the treatments at a 5% significance level.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Comparison of different response variables (A) and different treatments (B) of quinoa exposed to Cd and Pb treatments using principal component analysis.
Figure 5 Comparison of different response variables (A) and different treatments (B) of quinoa exposed to Cd and Pb treatments using principal component analysis.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 33 Not checked · 66 Own results and interpretations

46 more claims

Create a free account to see all 99 claims and to verify the 64 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 32
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Steel, R., Torrie, J., and Dickey, D. (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, McGraw-Hill. [3rd ed.].

Cited by

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Bamagoos, A. A., Alharby, H. F., & Abbas, G.
Affiliations
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
Corresponding author
Abbas, Ghulam
Venue
Toxics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-02-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
68
ISSN
2305-6304 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210642306
Cited by
54
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deanship of scientific research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah (G: 278-130-1442)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
Keywords
quinoa, cadmium, lead, heavy metal uptake, metal translocation, combined metal stress, oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, hydrogen peroxide, lipid peroxidation, membrane stability, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, plant biomass, metal tolerance, soil contamination, potassium uptake

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-15, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-15 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential Uptake and Translocation of Cadmium and Lead by Quinoa: A Multivariate Comparison of Physiological and Oxidative Stress Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/toxics10020068
The paper
Bamagoos, A. A., Alharby, H. F., & Abbas, G. (2022). Differential Uptake and Translocation of Cadmium and Lead by Quinoa: A Multivariate Comparison of Physiological and Oxidative Stress Responses. Toxics. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics10020068

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.