The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
VIRIDIC—A Novel Tool to Calculate the Intergenomic Similarities of Prokaryote-Infecting Viruses
Open accessAbstract
Nucleotide-based intergenomic similarities are useful to understand how viruses are related with each other and to classify them. Here we have developed VIRIDIC, which implements the traditional algorithm used by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), Bacterial and Archaeal Viruses Subcommittee, to calculate virus intergenomic similarities. When compared with other software, VIRIDIC gave the best agreement with the traditional algorithm, which is based on the percent identity between two genomes determined by BLASTN. Furthermore, VIRIDIC proved best at estimating the relatedness between more distantly-related phages, relatedness that other tools can significantly overestimate. In addition to the intergenomic similarities, VIRIDIC also calculates three indicators of the alignment ability to capture the relatedness between viruses: the aligned fractions for each genome in a pair and the length ratio between the two genomes. The main output of VIRIDIC is a heatmap integrating the intergenomic similarity values with information regarding the genome lengths and the aligned genome fraction. Additionally, VIRIDIC can group viruses into clusters, based on user-defined intergenomic similarity thresholds. The sensitivity of VIRIDIC is given by the BLASTN. Thus, it is able to capture relationships between viruses having in common even short genomic regions, with as low as 65% similarity. Below this similarity level, protein-based analyses should be used, as they are the best suited to capture distant relationships. VIRIDIC is available at viridic.icbm.de, both as a web-service and a stand-alone tool. It allows fast analysis of large phage genome datasets, especially in the stand-alone version, which can be run on the user’s own servers and can be integrated in bioinformatics pipelines. VIRIDIC was developed having viruses of Bacteria and Archaea in mind; however, it could potentially be used for eukaryotic viruses as well, as long as they are monopartite.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., et al. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 · Cited by 20,027
Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data
Gu, Z., Eils, R., & Schlesner, M. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313 · Cited by 10,034
Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Auch, A. F., Klenk, H.-P., & Göker, M. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-60 · Cited by 6,755
DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities
Goris, J., Konstantinidis, K. T., Klappenbach, J. A., Coenye, T., Vandamme, P., & Tiedje, J. M. (2007) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0 · Cited by 4,750
progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement
Darling, A. E., Mau, B., & Perna, N. T. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011147 · Cited by 3,848
A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity
Yoon, S.-H., Ha, S.-M., Lim, J., Kwon, S., & Chun, J. (2017) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4 · Cited by 3,632
OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity
Lee, I., Ouk Kim, Y., Park, S.-C., & Chun, J. (2016) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.000760 · Cited by 3,191
JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison
Richter, M., Rosselló-Móra, R., Oliver Glöckner, F., & Peplies, J. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 · Cited by 2,932
Cited by
Gaborieau, B., Vaysset, H., Tesson, F., Charachon, I., Dib, N., Bernier, J., Dequidt, T., Georjon, H., Clermont, O., Hersen, P., et al. (2024) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-024-01832-5 · Cited by 141
Genetic determinants of host tropism in Klebsiella phages
Beamud, B., García-González, N., Gómez-Ortega, M., González-Candelas, F., Domingo-Calap, P., & Sanjuan, R. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112048 · Cited by 113
Kunisch, F., Campobasso, C., Wagemans, J., Yildirim, S., Chan, B. K., Schaudinn, C., Lavigne, R., Turner, P. E., Raschke, M. J., Trampuz, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52595-w · Cited by 101
Pas, C., Fieseler, L., Pothier, J. F., & Briers, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77463-x · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Moraru, C., Varsani, A., & Kropinski, A. M.
- Venue
- Viruses
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-11-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1268
- ISSN
- 1999-4915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3097407122
- Cited by
- 872
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 37.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VIRIDIC—A Novel Tool to Calculate the Intergenomic Similarities of Prokaryote-Infecting Viruses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/v12111268
- The paper
- Moraru, C., Varsani, A., & Kropinski, A. M. (2020). VIRIDIC—A Novel Tool to Calculate the Intergenomic Similarities of Prokaryote-Infecting Viruses. Viruses. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12111268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.