The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
Plant viral diseases are the foremost threat to sustainable agriculture, leading to several billion dollars in losses every year. Many viruses infecting several crops have been described in the literature; however, new infectious viruses are emerging frequently through outbreaks. For the effective treatment and prevention of viral diseases, there is great demand for new techniques that can provide accurate identification on the causative agents. With the advancements in biochemical and molecular biology techniques, several diagnostic methods with improved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of prevalent and/or unknown plant viruses are being continuously developed. Currently, serological and nucleic acid methods are the most widely used for plant viral diagnosis. Nucleic acid-based techniques that amplify target DNA/RNA have been evolved with many variants. However, there is growing interest in developing techniques that can be based in real-time and thus facilitate in-field diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based innovative methods have shown great potential to detect multiple viruses simultaneously; however, such techniques are in the preliminary stages in plant viral disease diagnostics. This review discusses the recent progress in the use of NGS-based techniques for the detection, diagnosis, and identification of plant viral diseases. New portable devices and technologies that could provide real-time analyses in a relatively short period of time are prime important for in-field diagnostics. Current development and application of such tools and techniques along with their potential limitations in plant virology are likewise discussed in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Historical perspective, development and applications of next-generation sequencing in plant virology
Barba, M., Czosnek, H., & Hadidi, A. (2014) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v6010106 · Cited by 317 · cited 3×
“In recent decades, developments in NGS technologies have also provided a platform for viral diagnostics, and various viral species have been detected and identified by adopting these technologies [20].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTyler, A. D., Mataseje, L., Urfano, C. J., Schmidt, L., Antonation, K. S., Mulvey, M. R., & Corbett, C. R. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29334-5 · Cited by 294
Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Management
Lefterova, M. I., Suarez, C. J., Banaei, N., & Pinsky, B. A. (2015) · The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.07.004 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehetre, G. T., Leo, V. V., Singh, G., Sorokan, A., Maksimov, I., Yadav, M. K., Upadhyaya, K., Hashem, A., Alsaleh, A. N., Dawoud, T. M., Almaary, K. S., & Singh, B. P.
- Venue
- Viruses
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-03-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 412
- ISSN
- 1999-4915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3133494080
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/v13030412
- The paper
- Mehetre, G. T., Leo, V. V., Singh, G., Sorokan, A., Maksimov, I., Yadav, M. K., Upadhyaya, K., Hashem, A., Alsaleh, A. N., Dawoud, T. M., Almaary, K. S., & Singh, B. P. (2021). Current Developments and Challenges in Plant Viral Diagnostics: A Systematic Review. Viruses. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.