Cited by 14Influenza Virus Research StudiesVirology and Viral DiseasesAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Immunogenicity and Cross-Protective Efficacy Induced by an Inactivated Recombinant Avian Influenza A/H5N1 (Clade 2.3.4.4b) Vaccine against Co-Circulating Influenza A/H5Nx Viruses

Open access
Mahmoud, Sara H., Khalil, Ahmed A., Abo Shama, Noura M., El Sayed, Marwa F., Soliman, Reem A., Hagag, Naglaa M., Yehia, Nahed, Naguib, Mahmoud M. +4 more·2023·Vaccines

Abstract

Controlling avian influenza viruses (AIVs) is mainly based on culling of the infected bird flocks or via the implementation of inactivated vaccines in countries where AIVs are considered to be endemic. Over the last decade, several avian influenza virus subtypes, including highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 clade 2.2.1.2, H5N8 clade 2.3.4.4b and the recent H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, have been reported among poultry populations in Egypt. This demanded the utilization of a nationwide routine vaccination program in the poultry sector. Antigenic differences between available avian influenza vaccines and the currently circulating H5Nx strains were reported, calling for an updated vaccine for homogenous strains. In this study, three H5Nx vaccines were generated by utilizing the reverse genetic system: rgH5N1_2.3.4.4, rgH5N8_2.3.4.4 and rgH5N1_2.2.1.2. Further, the immunogenicity and the cross-reactivity of the generated inactivated vaccines were assessed in the chicken model against a panel of homologous and heterologous H5Nx HPAIVs. Interestingly, the rgH5N1_2.3.4.4 induced high immunogenicity in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken and could efficiently protect immunized chickens against challenge infection with HPAIV H5N1_2.3.4.4, H5N8_2.3.4.4 and H5N1_2.2.1.2. In parallel, the rgH5N1_2.2.1.2 could partially protect SPF chickens against infection with HPAIV H5N1_2.3.4.4 and H5N8_2.3.4.4. Conversely, the raised antibodies to rgH5N1_2.3.4.4 could provide full protection against HPAIV H5N1_2.3.4.4 and HPAIV H5N8_2.3.4.4, and partial protection (60%) against HPAIV H5N1_2.2.1.2. Compared to rgH5N8_2.3.4.4 and rgH5N1_2.2.1.2 vaccines, chickens vaccinated with rgH5N1_2.3.4.4 showed lower viral shedding following challenge infection with the predefined HPAIVs. These data emphasize the superior immunogenicity and cross-protective efficacy of the rgH5N1_2.3.4.4 in comparison to rgH5N8_2.3.4.4 and rgH5N1_2.2.1.2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/vaccines11091397

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahmoud, S. H., Khalil, A. A., Abo Shama, N. M., El Sayed, M. F., Soliman, R. A., Hagag, N. M., Yehia, N., Naguib, M. M., Arafa, A.-S., Ali, M. A., El-Safty, M. M., & Mostafa, A.
Affiliations
  • National Research Centre (EG)
  • Veterinary Serum and Vaccine Research Institute (EG)
  • Center of Scientific Excellence for Influenza Viruses, National Research Centre, Giza 12622, Egypt
  • Central Laboratory for Evaluation of Veterinary Biologics, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Abbasia, Cairo 11517, Egypt
  • Agricultural Research Center (EG)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Reference Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza 12618, Egypt
  • Texas Biomedical Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mostafa, Ahmed
Venue
Vaccines
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-08-22
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
1397
ISSN
2076-393X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386072956
Cited by
14
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Strategy for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology (ASRT), Egypt (TT110801, 12010126, CTS 21:1618, M2250, M22-0074, 2021-00833)
  • Egyptian National Research Centre (NRC) (TT110801, 12010126, CTS 21:1618, M2250, M22-0074, 2021-00833)
  • Carl Trygger Stiftelse (TT110801, 12010126, CTS 21:1618, M2250, M22-0074, 2021-00833)
  • Clas Groschinskys Minnesfond (TT110801, 12010126, CTS 21:1618, M2250, M22-0074, 2021-00833)
  • Åke Wibergs Stiftelse (TT110801, 12010126, CTS 21:1618, M2250, M22-0074, 2021-00833)
  • Swedish Research Council for Sustainable Development-FORMAS (TT110801, 12010126, CTS 21:1618, M2250, M22-0074, 2021-00833)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
H5N1 avian influenza, H5N8, inactivated vaccine, recombinant vaccine, reverse genetics, cross-protective immunity, immunogenicity, heterologous challenge, clade 2.3.4.4b, poultry vaccination, antibody response, SPF chickens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review