The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open Surface Water Mapping Algorithms: A Comparison of Water-Related Spectral Indices and Sensors
Open accessAbstract
Open surface water bodies play an important role in agricultural and industrial production, and are susceptible to climate change and human activities. Remote sensing data has been increasingly used to map open surface water bodies at local, regional, and global scales. In addition to image statistics-based supervised and unsupervised classifiers, spectral index- and threshold-based approaches have also been widely used. Many water indices have been proposed to identify surface water bodies; however, the differences in performances of these water indices as well as different sensors on water body mapping are not well documented. In this study, we reviewed and compared existing open surface water body mapping approaches based on six widely-used water indices, including the tasseled cap wetness index (TCW), normalized difference water index (NDWI), modified normalized difference water index (mNDWI), sum of near infrared and two shortwave infrared bands (Sum457), automated water extraction index (AWEI), land surface water index (LSWI), as well as three medium resolution sensors (Landsat 7 ETM+, Landsat 8 OLI, and Sentinel-2 MSI). A case region in the Poyang Lake Basin, China, was selected to examine the accuracies of the open surface water body maps from the 27 combinations of different algorithms and sensors. The results showed that generally all the algorithms had reasonably high accuracies with Kappa Coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.92. The NDWI-based algorithms performed slightly better than the algorithms based on other water indices in the study area, which could be related to the pure water body dominance in the region, while the sensitivities of water indices could differ for various water body conditions. The resultant maps from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 data had higher overall accuracies than those from Landsat 7. Specifically, all three sensors had similar producer accuracies while Landsat 7 based results had a lower user accuracy. This study demonstrates the improved performance in Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 for open surface water body mapping efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features
McFEETERS, S. K. (1996) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169608948714 · Cited by 7,725
Xu, H. (2006) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600589179 · Cited by 5,998
High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., & Belward, A. S. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature20584 · Cited by 5,513
Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services
Drusch, M., Del Bello, U., Carlier, S., Colin, O., Fernandez, V., Gascon, F., Hoersch, B., Isola, C., Laberinti, P., Martimort, P., et al. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026 · Cited by 4,815
Automated Water Extraction Index: A new technique for surface water mapping using Landsat imagery
Feyisa, G. L., Meilby, H., Fensholt, R., & Proud, S. R. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029 · Cited by 2,105
Preliminary analysis of the performance of the Landsat 8/OLI land surface reflectance product
Vermote, E., Justice, C., Claverie, M., & Franch, B. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.04.008 · Cited by 1,681
Zhu, Z., Wang, S., & Woodcock, C. E. (2015) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.12.014 · Cited by 1,560
Roy, D. P., Kovalskyy, V., Zhang, H. K., Vermote, E. F., Yan, L., Kumar, S. S., & Egorov, A. (2016) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.024 · Cited by 1,281
A Physically-Based Transformation of Thematic Mapper Data---The TM Tasseled Cap
Crist, E. P., & Cicone, R. C. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.1984.350619 · Cited by 1,257
Mapping paddy rice agriculture in southern China using multi-temporal MODIS images
Xiao, X., Boles, S., Liu, J., Zhuang, D., Frolking, S., Li, C., Salas, W., & Moore, B. (2005) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.009 · Cited by 1,062
Self-citation
Cited by
A review of remote sensing applications for water security: Quantity, quality, and extremes
Chawla, I., Karthikeyan, L., & Mishra, A. K. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124826 · Cited by 363
Mapping coastal wetlands of China using time series Landsat images in 2018 and Google Earth Engine
Wang, X., Xiao, X., Zou, Z., Hou, L., Qin, Y., Dong, J., Doughty, R. B., Chen, B., Zhang, X., Chen, Y., et al. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.014 · Cited by 299
Self-citationAdjovu, G. E., Stephen, H., James, D., & Ahmad, S. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15143534 · Cited by 292
Gainers and losers of surface and terrestrial water resources in China during 1989–2016
Wang, X., Xiao, X., Zou, Z., Dong, J., Qin, Y., Doughty, R. B., Menarguez, M. A., Chen, B., Wang, J., Ye, H., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17103-w · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Y., Dong, J., Xiao, X., Xiao, T., Yang, Z., Zhao, G., Zou, Z., & Qin, Y.
- Venue
- Water
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-04-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 256
- ISSN
- 2073-4441 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2604937949
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 16.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open Surface Water Mapping Algorithms: A Comparison of Water-Related Spectral Indices and Sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/w9040256
- The paper
- Zhou, Y., Dong, J., Xiao, X., Xiao, T., Yang, Z., Zhao, G., Zou, Z., & Qin, Y. (2017). Open Surface Water Mapping Algorithms: A Comparison of Water-Related Spectral Indices and Sensors. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.