Cited by 24Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Virtual consultations in general practice: embracing innovation, carefully

Open access
Chada, Bharadwaj V·2017·British Journal of General Practice

Abstract

Life &

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3399/bjgp17x691121

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital health solutions focusing on remote patient monitoring yield large economic benefits, and multiple studies have shown digital RPM reduces costs imposed on both patients and healthcare providers.

    “Furthermore, digital health solutions focusing on RPM yield large economic benefits; multiple studies have shown digital RPM reduces costs imposed on both patients and healthcare providers.”

    From A prospective observational real world feasibility study assessing the role of app-based remote patient monitoring in reducing primary care clinician workload during the COVID pandemic (2021) · cites this paper as [14]

    The COST-SAVING BENEFITS section describes potential time and cost savings for patients and broader economic benefits from virtual GP consultations. It does not establish those benefits for remote patient monitoring or cite multiple studies showing savings for both parties; instead, it says preliminary data suggest virtual consultations may cost the NHS more than face-to-face visits (£724 versus £625 per patient). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chada, B. V.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Chada, Bharadwaj V
Venue
British Journal of General Practice
Published
2017-05-25
Volume
67
Issue
659
Pages
264-264
ISSN
  • 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-5242
OpenAlex
W2618104503
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
teleconsultation, telemedicine, general practice, primary care innovation
MeSH terms
Appointments and Schedules, Cost-Benefit Analysis, United Kingdom, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Telecommunications, Remote Consultation, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review