‘Bad old habits'… and what really matters
Open accessAbstract
Revealing the reality of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical curriculaThank you for publishing our article 'Revealing the reality of undergraduate GP teaching in UK medical curricula' in which we highlighted the longstanding problem of underinvestment in general practice teaching in the UK. 1 One of our key recommendations was for 'an adequate primary care tariff, which reflects the cost of teaching and simplifies current payment mechanisms'.We are pleased to report that since writing this paper the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) in England has for the first time introduced a national minimum tariff for medical student placements in general practice.2 We of course welcome this development as a step in the right direction.However, the new minimum tariff of £28 000 per full-time equivalent (FTE) placement per year still falls significantly short of the current tariff for secondary care undergraduate medical placements set at £33 286. 3 A primary care payment of £28 000 per FTE is also significantly lower than the actual cost of undergraduate teaching in general practice, identified by a national study in England as £41 700 per FTE. 4 While there is no doubt that the health economy will be struggling in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, recent events surely present yet further evidence of the need to provide all future doctors with highquality experience in general practice and primary care.We strongly urge governing bodies to move fully to a fair and flat tariff for undergraduate placements from 2021 onwards if they are committed to training the future medical workforce that the NHS will surely need.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada
Urbach, D. R., Govindarajan, A., Saskin, R., Wilton, A. S., & Baxter, N. N. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1308261 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Back to basics: checklists in aviation and healthcare
Clay‐Williams, R., & Colligan, L. (2015) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003957 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Cottrell, E. S., Alberti, H., Rosenthal, J., et al. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x712325 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Ramsden, J. J. (2014) · Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry · doi:10.4024/10ra14e.jbpc.14.03 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Emergencies in general practice: could checklists support teams in stressful situations?
Greig, P. R., Maloney, A., & Higham, H. (2020) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp20x709373 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Rosenthal J, McKinley RK, Smyth C, Campbell JL. The real costs of teaching medical students in general practice: a cost-collection survey of teaching practices across England. Br J Gen Pract 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X706553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712721 REFERENCES · DOI
- Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22(6): 468-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X712757 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Greenhalgh, T., Rosen, R., Shaw, S. E., Byng, R., Faulkner, S., Finlay, T., Grundy, E., Husain, L., Hughes, G., Leone, C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“…burdensome (54), excludes the physical touch on which the therapeutic relationship has traditionally depended (55), threatens continuity of care (7), brings greater clinical uncertainty, and makes the personal care afforded by the extended, face-to-face “long consultation” more difficult (8, 56, 57).”
BackgroundUnintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care
Turner, A., Morris, R., Rakhra, D., Stevenson, F., McDonagh, L., Hamilton, F., Atherton, H., Farr, M., Blake, S., Banks, J., et al. (2022) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2021.0426 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
- Authors
- Swinglehurst, D., Dowrick, C., Heath, I., Hjörleifsson, S., Hull, S., Misselbrook, D., & Reeve, J.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Royal College of General Practitioners (GB)
- University of London (GB)
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Bahrain (BH)
- Hull York Medical School (GB)
- Venue
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 699
- Pages
- 485.3-486
- ISSN
- 0960-1643 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-5242
- PMC
- PMC7518894
- OpenAlex
- W3090426581
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of General Practice (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Queen Mary University of London
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (CS-2015-15-004)
- Universitetet i Bergen
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
- Keywords
- undergraduate medical education, general practice teaching, teaching funding, medical workforce training, Department of Health and Social Care
- MeSH terms
- Habits, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review