The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of Dr Google on doctor–patient encounters in primary care: a quantitative, observational, cross-sectional study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Two-thirds of all patients search the internet prior to a health consultation. AIM: To explore how searching for online health information before visiting a doctor influences patients' behaviour during the consultation. DESIGN & SETTING: A quantitative, observational, and cross-sectional study of 18-75-year-old patients who used the internet. METHOD: Patients were recruited by social media for the quantitative study. This was followed by a qualitiative study of GPs who were questioned in focus groups. Two questions were addressed: What is the effect of searching online health information on the behaviour of the patients? How does the GP handle this information? RESULTS: = 963) usually went to the doctor after the online information search but two-thirds were not reassured by the internet search. More than half of responders had more confidence in their GP after searching online. The older the responders, the more they went to the doctor after their internet search and the younger the responders, the more they were worried. The more frequently people consulted the internet for specific complaints, the more likely they reported reassurance. DISCUSSION: Patients usually made an appointment with their GP after the internet search. New symptoms are rarely noticed and the search usually did not lead patients to distrust their GP. The majority of GPs described positive effects of the online search behaviour on the consultation. CONCLUSION: The emerging use of the internet for searching health information, commonly referred to as 'Dr Google', is not seen as a threat by GPs and leads to a better mutual understanding of symptoms and diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The anecdotal use of internet searches for medical information, commonly referred to as “Dr Google” has been reported to facilitate the clinical encounter between the patient and the physician [124,125] without impacting adherence to treatment [126].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [125]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art
Cline, R. J. W. (2001) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/16.6.671 · Cited by 1,708
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques
McMillan, S. S., King, M. A., & Tully, M. P. (2016) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x · Cited by 1,570
Kontos, E., Blake, K. D., Chou, W.-Y. S., & Prestin, A. (2014) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.3117 · Cited by 917
Help seeking behavior and the Internet: A national survey
Ybarra, M. L., & Suman, M. (2006) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.029 · Cited by 466
Iverson, S. A., Howard, K., & Penney, B. K. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 274
Ybarra, M. L., & Suman, M. W. (2006) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyl062 · Cited by 273
Family Medicine Patients' Use of the Internet for Health Information: A MetroNet Study
Schwartz, K., Roe, T., Northrup, J., Meza, J. P., Seifeldin, R., & Neale, A. V. (2006) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.19.1.39 · Cited by 213
Nölke, L., Mensing, M., Krämer, A., & Hornberg, C. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1423-0 · Cited by 192
Manganello, J. A., Gerstner, G. R., Pergolino, K., Graham, Y. J., Falisi, A. L., & Strogatz, D. S. (2015) · Journal of Public Health Management and Practice · doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000000366 · Cited by 174
Information overload in healthcare: too much of a good thing?
Klerings, I., Weinhandl, A. S., & Thaler, K. J. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen · doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.005 · Cited by 162
Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey
Santana, S., Lausen, B., Bujnowska–Fedak, M. M., Chronaki, C. E., Prokosch, H., & Wynn, R. (2011) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-20 · Cited by 147
Hu, X., Bell, R. A., Kravitz, R. L., & Orrange, S. E. (2012) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.650828 · Cited by 134
Lewis, S. P., Mahdy, J. C., Michal, N. J., & Arbuthnott, A. E. (2014) · Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.187 · Cited by 85
Students’ trust judgements in online health information seeking
Rowley, J., Johnson, F., & Sbaffi, L. (2014) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458214546772 · Cited by 67
Torrent‐Sellens, J., Díaz-Chao, Á., Soler-Ramos, I., & Saigí-Rubió, F. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5605 · Cited by 56
Thorell, M., Fridorff-Jens, P. K., Lassen, P., Lange, T., & Kayser, L. (2015) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0330-5 · Cited by 51
Brady, E., Segar, J., & Sanders, C. (2016) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.029 · Cited by 45
Unmet Needs of Primary Care Patients in Using the Internet for Health-related Activities
Sciamanna, C., Clark, M. A., Houston, T. K., & Diaz, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4.3.e19 · Cited by 37
Staccini, P., Fernández-Luque, L., & Informatics, S. E. F. T. I. Y. S. O. C. H. (2016) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.15265/iy-2016-045 · Cited by 23
Educating the Patient for Health Care Communication in the Age of the World Wide Web
Woodward‐Kron, R. E., Connor, M., Schulz, P. J., & Elliott, K. A. (2013) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000101 · Cited by 16
Flash Eurobarometer 404 (European Citizens´ Digital Health Literacy)
European Commission, B. (2015) · GESIS Data Archive · doi:10.4232/1.12194 · Cited by 10
Adapting Health Education for the Internet Age
Katz, M. H. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0007 · Cited by 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Models in Medicine: The Potentials and Pitfalls
Omiye, J. A., Gui, H., Rezaei, S. J., Zou, J., & Daneshjou, R. (2024) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m23-2772 · Cited by 430
Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty
Mika, A. P., Martin, J. R., Engstrom, S. M., Polkowski, G. G., & Wilson, J. M. (2023) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.23.00209 · Cited by 273
Kubb, C., & Foran, H. M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19985 · Cited by 262
Large language model AI chatbots require approval as medical devices
Gilbert, S., Harvey, H., Melvin, T., Vollebregt, E., & Wicks, P. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02412-6 · Cited by 207
Gilbert, S., Mehl, A., Baluch, A., Cawley, C., Challiner, J., Fraser, H., Millen, E., Montazeri, M., Multmeier, J., Pick, F., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040269 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Riel, N., Auwerx, K., Debbaut, P., Van Hees, S., & Schoenmakers, B.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Schoenmakers, Birgitte
- Venue
- BJGP Open
- Published
- 2017-05-16
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- bjgpopen17X100833
- ISSN
- 2398-3795 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6169945
- OpenAlex
- W2616270221
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BJGP Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Keywords
- online health information seeking, doctor-patient consultation, primary care, patient behavior, general practitioners, patient reassurance, GP attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
