The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Six Sigma: pasos para la mejora continua de procesos
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wiklund, H., Wiklund, P.S. (2022). Widening the Six Sigma concept: An approach to improve organizational learning. Total Quality Management,13(2):233-9.
Cited by
Morales Medina, G. G., Morales Cruz, E. U., & Pérez Ambrosio, J. J. (2026) · Cultura científica y tecnológica · doi:10.20983/culcyt.2026.1.2.2
Metadata
- Authors
- Guamán Lozano, Á. G., Moyano Alulema, J. C., Cayán Martínez, J. C., & García Cabezas, E. F.
- Published
- 2023-04-27
- OpenAlex
- W4367309753
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- es
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- Six Sigma, Kaizen, quality management, process improvement methodology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six Sigma: pasos para la mejora continua de procesos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.33996/cide.ecuador.sg2616883
- The paper
- Guamán Lozano, Á. G., Moyano Alulema, J. C., Cayán Martínez, J. C., & García Cabezas, E. F. (2023). Six Sigma: pasos para la mejora continua de procesos. https://doi.org/10.33996/cide.ecuador.sg2616883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
