CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Aquaculture Nutrition and GrowthAlgal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Growth and Nutritional Values of Moina micrura Fed on Chlorella vulgaris Grown in Digested Palm Oil Mill Effluent

Open access
HABIB, M.A.B., YUSOFF, F.M., PHANG, S.M., MOHAMED, S.·2003·Asian Fisheries Science
DOI 10.33997/j.afs.2003.16.2.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Moina micrura Kruz (Isolate no. AR001), a cladoceran and an important aquaculture feed, was cultured on Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck (Isolate no. 001) grown in 10 and 20% digested palm oil mill effluent (POMED) and inorganic fertilizer (N:P:K = 1:1:0.50) in 70 l tanks. The collected microalgae was distributed to M. micrura twice daily at the rate of 3% dry body weight for 14 days. The specific growth rate of M. micrura was significantly higher (p<0.05) when fed on microalgae grown in 10% POMED than fed on the same cultured in 20% POMED and fertilizer. The protein and lipid contents were significantly higher (p<0.05) in M. micrura fed on microalgae grown in 10% POMED than in those fed on this microalgae cultured in other media. The essential amino acids such as histidine, arginine, threonine, phenylalanine, valine, methionine, lysine and tryptophan of C. vulgaris grown in 10% POMED enhanced the accumulation of these EAAs in M. micrura. The C18, C20 and C22 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) viz. linolenic acid (18:3n-3), ¡ linolenic acid (18:3n- 6), eicosatrienoic acid (20: 3n-6), arachidonic acid (20: 4n-6), EPA (20: 5n-3), DPA (22: 5n-3) and DHA (22: 6n-3) of C. vulgaris grown in 10% POMED enhanced the levels in M. micrura. The PUFAs were found significantly higher (p<0.05) in M. micrura fed on C. vulgaris cultured in 10% POMED followed by 20% POMED and only inorganic fertilizer. Most of the essential minerals were present in high amount in M. micrura fed on this algae gro…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33997/j.afs.2003.16.2.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HABIB, M. A. B., YUSOFF, F. M., PHANG, S. M., & MOHAMED, S.
ORCID
Venue
Asian Fisheries Science
Publisher
Asian Fisheries Society
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0116-6514 (ISSN-L)
  • 2073-3720
DOI
10.33997/j.afs.2003.16.2.002
OpenAlex
W2566187984
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
  • Asian Fisheries Science (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Moina micrura, Chlorella vulgaris, palm oil mill effluent, aquaculture feed, microalgae cultivation, specific growth rate, protein content, lipid content, essential amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, EPA, docosahexaenoic acid, mineral content, mineral fertilizers, waste valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review