Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exosomal proteins as potential diagnostic markers in advanced non‐small cell lung carcinoma

Open access
Jakobsen, Kristine R., Paulsen, Birgitte S., Bæk, Rikke, Varming, Kim, Sorensen, Boe S., Jørgensen, Malene M.·2015·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer‐related death. At the time of diagnosis, more than half of the patients will have disseminated disease and, yet, diagnosing can be challenging. New methods are desired to improve the diagnostic work‐up. Exosomes are cell‐derived vesicles displaying various proteins on their membrane surfaces. In addition, they are readily available in blood samples where they constitute potential biomarkers of human diseases, such as cancer. Here, we examine the potential of distinguishing non‐small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients from control subjects based on the differential display of exosomal protein markers. Methods: Plasma was isolated from 109 NSCLC patients with advanced stage (IIIa–IV) disease and 110 matched control subjects initially suspected of having cancer, but diagnosed to be cancer free. The Extracellular Vesicle Array (EV Array) was used to phenotype exosomes directly from the plasma samples. The array contained 37 antibodies targeting lung cancer‐related proteins and was used to capture exosomes, which were visualised with a cocktail of biotin‐conjugated CD9, CD63 and CD81 antibodies. Results: The EV Array analysis was capable of detecting and phenotyping exosomes in all samples from only 10 µL of unpurified plasma. Multivariate analysis using the Random Forests method produced a combined 30‐marker model separating the two patient groups with an area under the curve of 0.83, CI: 0.77–0.90. The 30‐marker model has a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.76, and it classifies patients with 75.3% accuracy. Conclusion: The EV Array technique is a simple, minimal‐invasive tool with potential to identify lung cancer patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/jev.v4.26659

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Jakobsen, K. R., Paulsen, B. S., Bæk, R., Varming, K., Sorensen, B. S., & Jørgensen, M. M.
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
26659-26659
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159903805
Cited by
333
References
2
FWCI
11.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.