Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Size‐exclusion chromatography as a stand‐alone methodology identifies novel markers in mass spectrometry analyses of plasma‐derived vesicles from healthy individuals

Open access
de Menezes‐Neto, Armando, Sáez, María José Fidalgo, Lozano‐Ramos, Inés, Segui‐Barber, Joan, Martin‐Jaular, Lorena, Ullate, Josep M. Estanyol, Fernandez‐Becerra, Carmen, Borrás, Francesc E., del Portillo, Hernando A.·2015·Journal of Extracellular Vesicles

Abstract

Plasma‐derived vesicles hold a promising potential for use in biomedical applications. Two major challenges, however, hinder their implementation into translational tools: (a) the incomplete characterization of the protein composition of plasma‐derived vesicles, in the size range of exosomes, as mass spectrometric analysis of plasma sub‐components is recognizably troublesome and (b) the limited reach of vesicle‐based studies in settings where the infrastructural demand of ultracentrifugation, the most widely used isolation/purification methodology, is not available. In this study, we have addressed both challenges by carrying‐out mass spectrometry (MS) analyses of plasma‐derived vesicles, in the size range of exosomes, from healthy donors obtained by 2 alternative methodologies: size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC) on sepharose columns and Exo‐Spin™. No exosome markers, as opposed to the most abundant plasma proteins, were detected by Exo‐Spin™. In contrast, exosomal markers were present in the early fractions of SEC where the most abundant plasma proteins have been largely excluded. Noticeably, after a cross‐comparative analysis of all published studies using MS to characterize plasma‐derived exosomes from healthy individuals, we also observed a paucity of “classical exosome markers.” Independent of the isolation method, however, we consistently identified 2 proteins, CD5 antigen‐like (CD5L) and galectin‐3‐binding protein (LGALS3BP), whose presence was validated by a bead‐exosome FACS assay. Altogether, our results support the use of SEC as a stand‐alone methodology to obtain preparations of extracellular vesicles, in the size range of exosomes, from plasma and suggest the use of CD5L and LGALS3BP as more suitable markers of plasma‐derived vesicles in MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/jev.v4.27378

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
de Menezes‐Neto, A., Sáez, M. J. F., Lozano‐Ramos, I., Segui‐Barber, J., Martin‐Jaular, L., Ullate, J. M. E., Fernandez‐Becerra, C., Borrás, F. E., & del Portillo, H. A.
Venue
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
27378-27378
ISSN
2001-3078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121875081
Cited by
191
References
2
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Size‐exclusion chromatography as a stand‐alone methodology identifies novel markers in mass spectrometry analyses of plasma‐derived vesicles from healthy individuals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jev.v4.27378
The paper
de Menezes‐Neto, A., Sáez, M. J. F., Lozano‐Ramos, I., Segui‐Barber, J., Martin‐Jaular, L., Ullate, J. M. E., Fernandez‐Becerra, C., Borrás, F. E., & del Portillo, H. A. (2015). Size‐exclusion chromatography as a stand‐alone methodology identifies novel markers in mass spectrometry analyses of plasma‐derived vesicles from healthy individuals. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles. https://doi.org/10.3402/jev.v4.27378

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.