The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaccination: the cornerstone of an efficient healthcare system
Open accessAbstract
Vaccination has made an important contribution to the decreased incidence of numerous infectious diseases and associated mortality. In 2013, it was estimated that 103 million cases of childhood diseases in the United States had been prevented by the use of vaccines since 1924. These health effects translate into positive economic results, as vaccination can provide significant savings by avoiding the direct and indirect costs associated with treating the disease and possible long-term disability. A recent US study estimated that every dollar spent on childhood vaccination could save US$3 from a payer perspective and US$10 from a societal perspective. The first vaccines set a high standard from a public health 'return on investment' perspective, because they are highly cost-saving. Today, however, where only a few healthcare interventions are considered to be cost-saving, the challenge that decision-makers typically face is to identify such healthcare interventions that are deemed cost-effective, that is, provide extra benefit at a reasonable extra cost. Some of the newer vaccines provide a solution to some of today's important health issues, such as cervical cancers with human papillomavirus vaccines, or debilitating diseases with herpes zoster vaccines. These recent, more expensive vaccines have been shown to be cost-effective in several economic analyses. Overall, vaccination can still be regarded as one of the most cost-effective healthcare interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of vaccination: a global perspective
EHRETH, J. (2003) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00377-3 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Barriers to vaccination in Latin America: A systematic literature review
Guzman-Holst, A., DeAntonio, R., Prado-Cohrs, D., & Juliao, P. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.088 · Cited by 594
Sex differences in vaccine-induced humoral immunity
Fischinger, S., Boudreau, C. M., Butler, A. L., Streeck, H., & Alter, G. (2019) · Seminars in Immunopathology · doi:10.1007/s00281-018-0726-5 · Cited by 410
Voo, J. Y. H., Lean, Q. Y., Ming, L. C., Md. Hanafiah, N. H., Al-Worafi, Y. M., & Ibrahim, B. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9111348 · Cited by 380
Rapid development and deployment of high‐volume vaccines for pandemic response
Kis, Z., Kontoravdi, C., Dey, A. K., Shattock, R., & Shah, N. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing · doi:10.1002/amp2.10060 · Cited by 105
Advances in Toxoplasma gondii vaccines: current strategies and challenges for vaccine development
Chu, K.-B., & Quan, F.-S. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9050413 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Rémy, V., Zöllner, Y., & Heckmann, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Market Access & Health Policy
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27041
- ISSN
- 2001-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1905091926
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaccination: the cornerstone of an efficient healthcare system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/jmahp.v3.27041
- The paper
- Rémy, V., Zöllner, Y., & Heckmann, U. (2015). Vaccination: the cornerstone of an efficient healthcare system. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy. https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v3.27041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.