The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education
Open accessAbstract
Interprofessional education is a collaborative approach to develop healthcare students as future interprofessional team members and a recommendation suggested by the Institute of Medicine. Complex medical issues can be best addressed by interprofessional teams. Training future healthcare providers to work in such teams will help facilitate this model resulting in improved healthcare outcomes for patients. In this paper, three universities, the Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, the University of Florida and the University of Washington describe their training curricula models of collaborative and interprofessional education.The models represent a didactic program, a community-based experience and an interprofessional-simulation experience. The didactic program emphasizes interprofessional team building skills, knowledge of professions, patient centered care, service learning, the impact of culture on healthcare delivery and an interprofessional clinical component. The community-based experience demonstrates how interprofessional collaborations provide service to patients and how the environment and availability of resources impact one's health status. The interprofessional-simulation experience describes clinical team skills training in both formative and summative simulations used to develop skills in communication and leadership.One common theme leading to a successful experience among these three interprofessional models included helping students to understand their own professional identity while gaining an understanding of other professional's roles on the health care team. Commitment from departments and colleges, diverse calendar agreements, curricular mapping, mentor and faculty training, a sense of community, adequate physical space, technology, and community relationships were all identified as critical resources for a successful program. Summary recommendations for best practices included the need for administrative support, interprofessional programmatic infrastructure, committed faculty, and the recognition of student participation as key components to success for anyone developing an IPE centered program.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Green, B. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2015) · Journal of Chiropractic Education · doi:10.7899/jce-14-36 · Cited by 503
A comparative study of interprofessional education in global health care: A systematic review
Herath, C., Zhou, Y., Gan, Y., Nakandawire, N., Gong, Y., & Lu, Z. (2017) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000007336 · Cited by 164
Mapping the dark matter of context: A conceptual scoping review.
Bates, J., & Ellaway, R. H. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13034 · Cited by 144
Nagel, D. A., Penner, J. L., Halas, G., Philip, M. T., & Cooke, C. A. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05114-w · Cited by 47
Hanum, C., Findyartini, A., & Soemantri, D. (2023) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2022.2086221 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridges, D., Davidson, R. A., Soule Odegard, P., Maki, I. V., & Tomkowiak, J.
- Venue
- Medical Education Online
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6035
- ISSN
- 1087-2981 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992160849
- Cited by
- 1,013
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035
- The paper
- Bridges, D., Davidson, R. A., Soule Odegard, P., Maki, I. V., & Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.