Cited by 13Geophysics and Gravity MeasurementsStatistical and numerical algorithmsOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes

Discrete solutions of the boundary value problem in physical geodesy

Open access
Bjerhammar, Arne·1975·Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography

Abstract

Solutions of the discrete boundary value problem of physical geodesy are discussed. Dirac impulses, Wiener–Hopf predictions and “reflexive predictions” are compared. The dramatic computational gains with “reflexive filtering” are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/tellusa.v27i2.9892

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The gravitational potential difference at points P and Q can be calculated using the general theory of relativity and frequency measurements obtained from atomic clocks.

    “According to Bjerhammar, (1975) and Bjerhammar, (1985), the gravitational potential difference at points P and Q can be calculated using the general theory of relativity and frequency measurements obtained from atomic clocks, with the following formula [Sjöberg and Bagherbandi (2017), Chapter 7]:”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bjerhammar, A.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Bjerhammar, Arne
Venue
Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
Published
1975-01-01
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
97
ISSN
  • 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0870
OpenAlex
W2041817758
Cited by
13
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Keywords
discrete boundary value problems, physical geodesy, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review