Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 750

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perturbation of the northern hemisphere radiative balance by backscattering from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols*

Open access
Charlson, R. J., Langner, J., Rodhe, H., Leovy, C. B., Warren, S. G.·1991·Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography

Abstract

Anthropogenic sulfate (SO4=) aerosol particles play two potential roles in the radiative climate of the earth. In cloud-free air, SO4= particles scatter sunlight, some of which is lost to space, thereby reducing solar irradiance at the ground. The same particles can act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), the number concentration of which is an important determinant of cloud albedo. This albedo effect, in turn, also influences incoming short-wave solar radiation. Development of a three-dimensional global model for estimating the SO4= aerosol mass concentration, along with previously-acquired information on the scattering and back-scattering coefficients per unit mass concentration allow calculation of the effects of anthropogenic SO4= aerosol on clear-sky optical depth. Subsequently, this can be used to estimate the change in hemispheric and global average reflected solar radiation. The conclusion is that the change of reflected solar flux due to anthropogenic SO4= averaged over the Northern Hemisphere is ca. - 1.1 Wm-2, which is comparable but opposite in sign to the present-day radiative forcing by anthropogenic CO2, + 1.5 Wm-2. Because of the spatial variability of the anthropogenic SO4= distribution, its meteorological effects must be studied regionally. That is, global models with regional resolution and regional data are required. Unlike the direct effect on solar irradiance, the relationship of CCN number concentration to mass concentration is not known. Thus it is not yet possible to make quantitatively reliable statements about anthropogenic forcing of cloud albedo, although there is qualitative evidence that the CCN effect may also be substantial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3402/tellusa.v43i4.11944

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 750

Metadata

Authors
Charlson, R. J., Langner, J., Rodhe, H., Leovy, C. B., & Warren, S. G.
Venue
Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography
Published
1991-01-01
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
152
ISSN
  • 0280-6495 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0870
OpenAlex
W1968951659
Cited by
750
References
1
FWCI
58.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perturbation of the northern hemisphere radiative balance by backscattering from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3402/tellusa.v43i4.11944
The paper
Charlson, R. J., Langner, J., Rodhe, H., Leovy, C. B., & Warren, S. G. (1991). Perturbation of the northern hemisphere radiative balance by backscattering from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols*. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v43i4.11944

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.