The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age statement and misstatement in the nineteenth-century Philippines : some preliminary findings
Abstract
In this study of mid-nineteenth century Tigaon, comparisons of actual ages (calculated from baptisms) with stated ages (at marriages and burials and in parish censuses) show a high degree of error. Over half of all stated ages of adults, for example, were more than one year in error. Much of this error appears to be random, and some may be accounted for by digit preference, tax avoidance, or simple "rounding up". There are also indications, however, of an underlying indigenous model of society based on physiological development rather than chronological age ; stated ages, particularly for women, tend to bc adjusted toward the fertile years between 18 and 40.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Owen, N. G.
- Corresponding author
- Owen, Norman G.
- Venue
- Annales de démographie historique
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 1988
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 327-349
- ISSN
- 0066-2062 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2282125555
- Semantic Scholar
- dd824c01498facc14d5421cd63870b2cfc84002a
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annales de Démographie Historique (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Philippine History and Culture
- Keywords
- baptismal records, marriage records, digit preference, rounding, physiological age, reproductive age, maternal age, historical demography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review