Cited by 0Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHistorical Economic and Social StudiesPhilippine History and Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Age statement and misstatement in the nineteenth-century Philippines : some preliminary findings

Owen, Norman G.·1989·Annales de démographie historique

Abstract

In this study of mid-nineteenth century Tigaon, comparisons of actual ages (calculated from baptisms) with stated ages (at marriages and burials and in parish censuses) show a high degree of error. Over half of all stated ages of adults, for example, were more than one year in error. Much of this error appears to be random, and some may be accounted for by digit preference, tax avoidance, or simple "rounding up". There are also indications, however, of an underlying indigenous model of society based on physiological development rather than chronological age ; stated ages, particularly for women, tend to bc adjusted toward the fertile years between 18 and 40.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3406/adh.1989.1722

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Owen, N. G.
Corresponding author
Owen, Norman G.
Venue
Annales de démographie historique
Published
1989
Volume
1988
Issue
1
Pages
327-349
ISSN
0066-2062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2282125555
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
closed
Locations
Annales de Démographie Historique (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Philippine History and Culture
Keywords
baptismal records, marriage records, digit preference, rounding, physiological age, reproductive age, maternal age, historical demography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review