Quelques remarques sur la huppe (Upupa epops) dans l’Égypte ancienne: avec 4 planches
Open accessAbstract
Keimer Louis. Quelques remarques sur la huppe (Upupa epops) dans l’Égypte ancienne. In: Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale, Tome 30, 1931. pp. 305-331.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Southern Upper Egyptian dialects were phonologically tendentially progressive and probably already at the time of script origin used the vulture sign for /'/, while northern Lower Egyptian dialects retained the old value /r/ or /l/ partly into the Middle Kingdom.
“daß südliche (oberägyptische) dialekte phonologisch tendentiell progressiv 276 waren und vermutlich schon zur Zeit der Schriftentstehung mit dem Schriftzeichen des”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 2
- Authors
- Keimer, L.
- Corresponding author
- Keimer, Louis
- Venue
- Bulletin de l'Institut français d'archéologie orientale
- Publisher
- PERSEE Program
- Published
- 1931
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 305-331
- ISSN
- 0255-0962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4394880093
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bulletin de l Institut français d archéologie orientale (publishedVersion)
- Persée (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- Upupa epops, ancient Egyptian religion, Egyptian mythology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
